Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

EU Delay Revision of Internet Data Retention Directive to Boost Privacy

Thursday, July 12th, 2012 (8:39 am) - Score 900
internet privacy uk

The European Commission (EC) appears to have quietly confirmed that it will not revise the controversial Data Retention Directive (DRD) this year, which could affect the UK’s draft Communications Data Bill that seeks to expand the country’s internet snooping power through big broadband ISPs.

The DRD is essentially a mirror for the UK’s existing Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), which gives the government, local authorities and security forces the power to request that an ISP or telephone operator be required to retain a very basic log of their customers phone and internet use.

But the DRD has historically had a “complex legal relationship” with its rival e-Privacy Directive, which isn’t helped by the fact that neither has been able to produce an effective definition of serious crime. This same problem also afflicts the UK’s newly proposed Comms Data Bill, which some fear could allow for requests about less serious offences.

Crucial to all this is the fact that the EC has been considering a repeal or amendment to article 15 of the e-Privacy Directive, which is the part that allows Member States (e.g. the UK) to, “restrict privacy rights and obligations, including through the retention of data for a limited period, where ‘necessary, appropriate and proportionate“. The last part is seen as contradicting the definition of serious crime.

Now a new email circulated by the European Internet Services Providers Association (EuroISPA), which has since been posted into the public domain, reveals that the EC intends to resolve this conundrum and potentially improve privacy, at least in one area, by delaying its DRD so that it can be revised at the same time as the e-Privacy Directive.

EuroISPA Mail Shot

After discussions at cabinet level between Commissioners Kroes and Malmström, the decision has been taken to postpone the revision of the Data Retention Directive (DRD) to have it in parallel with the e-Privacy Directive.

This complex legal relationship between the Directive and the e-Privacy Directive, combined with the absence of a definition in either of the two directives of the notion of ‘serious crime’, makes it difficult to distinguish, on the one hand, measures taken by Member States to transpose the data retention obligations laid down in the Directive and, on the other, the more general practice in Member States of data retention permitted by Article 15(1) of the e-Privacy Directive.”

As a result both directives will now be delayed until 2013 or 2014, although this is contingent upon the European Parliament (EP) and Council being able to get their related General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ready first, which will help to inform both of the other directives.

At this stage it’s still too early to say whether or not any proposed changes will have a positive or more detrimental effect upon the privacy of individual citizens, although it’s fair to say that many in Europe feel the original directive went too far. But at the same time there are others whom, like the UK government, would like to see some aspects expanded to cover new internet systems and services. Other issues, such as the cost burden upon ISPs and the length of data storage, are also likely to be tackled.

Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
1 Response
  1. So this is what so many died for in the last war? Why I was bombed out of our House twice in the last war? For this kind of FREEDOM eh? Being snooped on in everything we write or say. Is this why we nearly elected this Coalition Government to continue what the previous Labour Government started actioning. Our once “Sovereign” Country paying fines for not wanting THEIR people to be snooped upon by strangers? Well how about if I save them the bother, and every e-mail I send out, a copy will go to the EU and one to the UK alleged Government?

    In the last war we didn’t mind having letters opened and censored, for an unguarded word here and there might have put our fighting forces at risk, or made targets of certain places here in the UK. BUT WE ARE NOT AT WAR NOW ARE WE?
    So WHY are most Countries, even those outside the EU so ready to give up their freedoms? When all is said and done all those in the “TOP JOBS” the future Generations will never know the freedom their parents have given away, and all those that fought and died for freedom will have died for absolutely nothing for those THEY gave their FREEDOM and LIVES for, just threw it all away, and what is more paid foreigners FINANCIALLY to make it happen. This legislation will not make people like the EU nor their present Governments any better at all.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £21.00 (*25.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Shopping Voucher
  • TalkTalk £21.95 (*36.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
  • Post Office £22.90 (*37.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Direct Save Telecom £22.95 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2531)
  2. FTTP (2253)
  3. FTTC (1674)
  4. Building Digital UK (1616)
  5. Politics (1444)
  6. Openreach (1430)
  7. Business (1258)
  8. Statistics (1110)
  9. FTTH (1105)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1056)
  11. Fibre Optic (978)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (922)
  13. 4G (918)
  14. Wireless Internet (917)
  15. Virgin Media (870)
  16. EE (602)
  17. Sky Broadband (599)
  18. TalkTalk (586)
  19. Vodafone (532)
  20. 3G (417)
New Forum Topics
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact