» ISP News » 

UPDATE Ofcom Force BT to Cut UK Standard Wholesale Broadband ISP Prices

Thursday, July 11th, 2013 (8:16 am) - Score 3,778

Ofcom has today proposed several new measures that would effectively force BT to cut the cost of their fixed line wholesale broadband services (WLR, SMPF, MPF) to Internet providers (ISP) and redefine which parts of the United Kingdom (UK) should be subject to related regulation or indeed de-regulation.

The first charge control measure means that customers of both BT-based (Wholesale Line Rental) and unbundled (LLU SMPF and MPF) fixed line broadband services (e.g. TalkTalk, Sky Broadband etc.) could conceivably benefit from a small reduction in price, which would be effective from 1st April 2014 until 31st March 2017.

As with previous adjustments the prices would be set by charge controls linked to inflation (measured under the Consumer Price Index), which Ofcom believes can provide “an incentive for BT to make efficiency gains“.

In reality it’s usually a little more complicated than that and in the past BT has had a tendency to put up their standard phone line rental and call charges, which some see as a method to help it compensate for any Ofcom imposed reductions. However the proposed charge control adjustments are small and thus many ISPs may not feel inclined to pass them on (some might use them to cover rising costs in other areas).

Ofcoms Proposed Charge Controls

Fully unbundled lines (MPF)
The regulated wholesale price for this service today is £84.26 per year. Under Ofcom’s proposals this will fall in real terms by between CPI − 0% and CPI − 6% every year;

Shared unbundled lines (SMPF)
The regulated wholesale price today is £9.75 per year. Under Ofcom’s proposals this will fall in real terms by between CPI − 8% and CPI − 12% every year;

Wholesale line rental (WLR)
The regulated wholesale price today is £93.27 per year. Under Ofcom’s proposals this will fall in real terms by between CPI − 2% and CPI − 8% every year.

In related news Ofcom has also proposed to deregulate a larger slice of BTWholesale’s market. The changes would only apply to parts of the market where Ofcom has deemed BT to have Significant Market Power (SMP) in the delivery of broadband services, which is usually rural areas or locations where there’s little or no competition from rival ISPs.

Ofcom currently classifies different parts of the country based upon the amount of competition from ISPs in any given area (i.e. Market 1, Market 2, Market 3 and Hull). In short, Market 3 areas are home to several ISPs and thus have the lowest prices due to de-regulation, while Market 1 is the opposite and services are usually only available from BT (i.e. today Market 1 equates to the last 11.7% of premises in predominantly rural areas).

The regulator claims that, since its last review in 2010, “the area of the UK with effective competition has grown in the last three years from 78% to 90%” (mostly due to the expansion of cheaper LLU networks from TalkTalk and Sky Broadband etc.). As a result this means that the areas where no regulation of BT is needed have grown. The new solution thus proposes to re-draw the market definitions as follows.

Ofcoms New Market Definitions

Market A
Where there are only one or two potential significant wholesale broadband providers present or forecast to be present, which accounts for 9.6% of UK premises.

Market B
In which we believe there is effective competition, accounting for 89.7% of premises (exchange areas where there are three or more primary ISPs present or forecast to be

Hull Area
Covers 0.7% of UK premises, where KCOM (KC) is the only significant provider.

Market B would thus be free of regulation since competition has already ensured a nice selection of ISPs and lower prices. In real terms this means that around 12% more UK premises than before might be able to benefit from cheaper services after having previously been classified in one of the country’s least competitive areas.

But Market A would still be subject to a price control on BT’s services at a level within the range CPI-7% to CPI-1%, together with cost accounting obligations. This is important because some BT based ISPs, such as PlusNet, can charge customers significantly more if they live within Market 1 (soon to be Market A) area as they cost more to serve.

A BT Spokesperson said:

These proposals are complex and we will review them in depth. There are a number of areas where we believe Ofcom have not fully recognised the costs of providing services.”

Both of the relevant consultations are open until 25th September 2013 and Ofcom anticipates the complete conclusion of all its related fixed access telecoms market reviews by spring 2014, though we’ll probably hear the outcome for some of these proposals before then.

Wholesale Broadband Access Review Consultation

Approach to Setting LLU and WLR Charge Controls Consultation

UPDATE 8:20am

Here’s the full summary of charge control changes that Ofcom has proposed.


UPDATE 11:01am

Just to be clear because there’s some natural cross-over between Ofcom’s charge control and the semi-separate market de-regulation / definition changes. The regulators proposals to deregulate 90% of the UK relate to the broadband services provided by BTWholesale only (IPStream). We’ve also added a statement from BT above.

Leave a Comment
10 Responses
  1. Avatar Bob says:

    My understanding of the latest OFCOM regulations is they are bringing in controls to sop BT loading it onto the line rental and BT will have to cut them by up to 12% a year

    1. Mark Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      Where there’s a will..

  2. Avatar DTMark says:

    “The regulator claims that, since its last review in 2010, “the area of the UK with effective competition has grown in the last three years from 78% to 90%””

    Effective competition is only present in places with more than one network capable of delivering services to premises. For instance, cabled areas, those with Hyperoptic, Metronet etc.

    Competition within a vertical monopoly is not competition in any true sense mostly because there is no key driver to raise standards where there is one single but core link in the delivery of those services.

  3. Avatar Phil says:

    Hope the line rental will reduce the cost in the coming year!

  4. Avatar Bob says:

    The key issue is we have a growing BT monopoly in the HS Broadband market outside of the cabled areas, If you are not in a cabled area you have BT or BT. There are a few other suppliers but they are to a great extent just reselling the BT product

    The BDUK contracts should have given some work to another supplier even if only to compare costs an performance. BDUK have no real idea as to what BT’s costs are and hence if the subsidy is to high

    There seems at present as well no formal system to claw back the BDUK subsidy as areas move into profit

    1. Avatar FibreFred says:

      I don’t see what this announcement has to do with BDUK

      If this hits BT’s profit I just expect it will mean less investment in future broadband tech 😐

  5. Avatar Clive says:

    If they are forced to reduce line rental they will just increase call per minute cost to claw the loss back. BT are stupid but not that stupid.

  6. Avatar cyclope says:

    They only have to start charging for those FREE sports channels then they could reduce line rental to what it was earlier on this year
    Line rental saver is no longer a good choice it’s overpriced for a 12mth one off payment in advance,they could also cut the price of calling a uk mobile too, but they never will,they would sooner offer FREE or half priced broadband and TV instead,no wonder why they keep hiking line rental + call tarrifs

    1. Avatar Clive says:

      Do not forget BTs ‘bundle packages’ used to also come with free evening and weekend calls, its now just weekends. So they already had plans to screw the consumer in advance.

  7. Avatar mark klinger says:

    surprise,surprise Plusnet has put up its prices where there is no real competition !

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £22.00
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Onestream £22.49 (*29.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*35.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
  • Vodafone £23.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2768)
  2. FTTP (2746)
  3. FTTC (1783)
  4. Building Digital UK (1740)
  5. Politics (1662)
  6. Openreach (1619)
  7. Business (1429)
  8. FTTH (1340)
  9. Statistics (1240)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1221)
  11. Fibre Optic (1062)
  12. 4G (1052)
  13. Wireless Internet (1020)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1014)
  15. Virgin Media (1004)
  16. EE (696)
  17. Sky Broadband (668)
  18. Vodafone (666)
  19. TalkTalk (661)
  20. 5G (514)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact