BT Tweaks UK Phone Call Clearing Procedure Again to Stop Fraudsters
BT has once again tweaked their national telecoms network in order to significantly reduce the time that a phone call connection can be held open (active) after the called party puts their handset down (i.e. such as when you end a voice call), which could make life more difficult for fraudsters.
Related scams work because most people will be unaware that the phone line stays open for a period unless both callers replace their respective handsets (the initiating caller in particular). For example, if you call a friend but only they put their handset down then if they pick it up again later you can still hear them.
Obviously this can be exploited by fraudsters who trick consumers into contacting their bank or another service. A wise consumer, after receiving a potentially suspicious call, will typically replace the handset before getting the legitimate number for their bank and then make the call and all without realising that the fraudster is still on the line (they act as a fake support agent).
Until recently BT’s network would wait between 2 and 3 minutes before initiating call clearing to stop the above from happening, although last year this was reduced to 10 seconds “with an option to reduce it further in the near future if required” (here)
Unfortunately fraudsters have still been using this trick and so the BBC reports that BT has now cut the time to just 2 seconds. Other providers have also made similar tweaks.
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, Google+, Facebook and Linkedin.
« UK Gov Publish New ISP Internet Snooping Investigatory Powers Bill
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.
NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
In most cases there would be no dial tone.
Why do people not notice this?
In any case why does there have to be a delay?
Can’t the line be cleared immediately?
Nothing stops the fraudster playing a dialtone down the line at the point where the victim hangs up and gets ready to pick up the phone to call their bank.
Possibly using DECT phones that let you dial before seizing the line?
Although with the ones I’ve had you do still hear dialtone briefly as it picks up the line and then rapidly sends the DTMF tones to dial, but I wonder how many people realistically pay attention to that.
“A wise consumer, after receiving a potentially suspicious call, will typically replace the handset before getting the legitimate number for their bank and then make the call”
Better still, assuming you have both a landline phone and a mobile, don’t call back from the phone they rang, use the other one!
Long call clearing times have existed since the 1960s when taxi companies were able to block competitive taxi companies from receiving calls.
It is as a result of BT’s reluctance to reduce the clearing times that many of us have been defrauded, including myself of £15,000.
Is anyone interested in starting a Class Action?