Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Study Claims 23 Million UK People Struggle to Connect to 4G

Thursday, Oct 3rd, 2019 (12:01 am) - Score 1,628

A new uSwitch.com commissioned Opinium survey of 2,010 UK adults (conducted during July 2019), which has been complemented by data from Opensignal, claims that 23 million consumers (45%) still struggle to connect to 4G, while 5G “looks unlikely” to fix this since it will only be available to 28% of the country by the end of 2019.

At present it’s far too early to be moaning about poor access to 5G, which is only just now starting to rollout in the United Kingdom (O2 hasn’t even launched their service yet) and will probably take several years to achieve today’s level of 4G coverage, but that doesn’t seem to worry this study (it complains that 72% of the population will be “left without access to fifth-generation connectivity in the near future” – you don’t say).

Out of the 45% of respondents – equated to 23 million consumers – who said they still had trouble connecting to 4G, an estimated 5 million claim to be struggling every day with the same issue and a third (33%) of adult Smartphone users – 17.1 million people – have trouble connecting to 4G at least once a week. The study notes how this is despite Ofcom’s claim that geographic UK coverage from all four primary operators is 66% (here).

However the figures appear to overlook some important aspects of how consumers actually use such services (e.g. whether or not the issues are reported indoor or outdoor and how long they last). For example, in my own house 4G is fine outside but it’s weak inside and in one room it’ll drop back to 3G due to thick walls. Mobile isn’t magic, it’s limited by the laws of physicals and the associated reality of whatever environment you’re in at the time.

In terms of the Opensignal data, the study reveals that only three quarters (75%) of the South West is covered by 4G and “huge swathes of the region will miss out on 5G in the short term” (obviously.. give them a chance to roll it out first!). Wales and Scotland are also lagging behind the rest of the country in 4G availability, at 76% and 77% respectively.

opensignal_4g_by_uk_region

The digital divide is also highlighted by the low 4G availability figures in rural areas (something that the industry and Ofcom are trying to resolve), while the UK’s major cities all have more than 80% coverage. Nottingham has the highest 4G coverage in the UK, with 89% of the city served by such networks.

London perhaps surprisingly comes 15th out of 16 cities, with just 84% of the capital covered by 4G (the consumer survey found 60% of Londoners had experienced trouble connecting to 4G). Only Edinburgh has worse coverage, with 4G available in just 83% of the city. Once again though, this isn’t really considering the context for those occasions where 4G is lost (deep indoors, inside lifts, underground etc.).

opensignal_4g_by_uk_city

Despite connectivity issues it’s noted that 73% of phone users have not changed network in the past 2 years and 22% have not switched for more than 5 years, although Ofcom’s new “text-to-switch” system (here) may yet help to improve upon those figures.

Meanwhile only 14% of phone users plan to upgrade to 5G within the next year, which is hardly surprising since many will still be stuck within existing contracts, aren’t covered and others probably feel they don’t need the faster speeds (yet), or have no burning desire to get a newer phone.

Otherwise only 19% of respondents think 5G will improve connectivity and 30% expect it to be more expensive, even though Three UK and Vodafone have introduced it at no extra cost over 4G. Now, how about we allow 5G a few years to get its rollout going before criticising it for being unable to perform magic tricks with coverage.

Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
16 Responses
  1. Avatar photo apolloa says:

    I think your wrong Mark. I think we can happily heavily criticise 5G, because if the times we now live in, it really shouldn’t take ‘several years’ to be rolled out in cities, and if it will take several years before and if it reaches the population outside of the metropolitan areas then that alone deserves heavy criticism.
    But it’s the same old accolade, their is no real effort from suppliers to build a proper network that all can use and they gives maximum coverage, they don’t want to spend the money and the government doesn’t feel inclined to really do so either, so we all suffer with poor coverage. Or your locked to one provider only as it’s the only one that gives you the best signal, not much of a ‘free market’ there is it?

    So based on historical facts around mobile phone signals, the industry deserves its criticism I think.

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      “it really shouldn’t take ‘several years’ to be rolled out in cities”

      I was talking generally about the whole of the UK in my own comments, since the cities usually don’t take as long (first 1 year+). So far in every similar country that I’ve seen a new generation of mobile technology always takes a few years to reach coverage maturity through natural market conditions.

      Certainly you could speed that up by making access even easier and further eroding landowners rights, including individual home owners this time, but that alone isn’t a magic fix for the realities of sustainable and affordable resources / engineering. 5G also requires more sites to be fed by fibre rather than Microwave, which is an additional challenge.

      We have a tendency in this country to expect infrastructure builders to perform miracles but some things are simply not realistic. How long do you think 5G should take to rollout and what changes would you make to deliver on that?

    2. Avatar photo A_Builder says:

      Why would you rush to build out immature 1st gen tech?

      As Mark says one major rate limiting factor is fibre backhaul – or lack of it.

      Fully implemented urban 5G needs a lot of lamp posts connected to full fibre. That needs a lot of fibre.

      I do a agree that civics build speed is about 1/3 of what it could be if regulations and processes were relaxed. We have decided as a nation that making everything slow and expensive is a legislative priority.

  2. Avatar photo JAMES BODY says:

    These findings do not appear to match up with the official OFCOM line that all four UK MNOs have met the 4G coverage obligations that were imposed as a condition of their 4G/800MHz licences, issued in 2013.

    These obligations were signed off as being complied with in March 2018 – https://www.ofcom.org.uk/spectrum/information/cellular-coverage

    This includes the requirement placed upon O2 Telefónica UK Ltd (O2) to provide a minimum level of indoor data coverage to 98% of all UK premises by 31 December 2017, with a minimum of 95% in any of the four nations of the UK.

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      I suspect the reason for that is partly because Ofcom’s older coverage targets were based around population coverage and the regulator’s own way of measuring that, which is a much easier gauge to meet than geographic coverage.

      The Opensignal stats above are of course also from crowd-sourced data and so lack a solid scientific baseline for effective comparison. In the real-world we all know mobile can be flaky and accurate measurement is incredibly difficult.

    2. Avatar photo Mark says:

      Aren’t they all computer predictions? My area is supposed to high quality 4/3G coverage, you can’t get a signal outside and only a very weak -120 dbm 2G signal.

    3. Avatar photo Lex says:

      Generally the 98-99% coverage metric is outdoor coverage not indoor coverage

      generally O2 have there pole masts in housed areas as they generally have good coverage indoors and are still actively installing masts on public roads (vodafone and O2 don’t seem to like mast sharing companies like NBNL as there is a big building they could of put the equipment for vodafone/O2 to enable on the mast

      vodafone are building masts as well, new one in last 30 days near me it’s so new only 3g signal is up, no 4g signal yet but once it is up that will fix the 4g dropout here, its strange for a new mast not to also have 5g cells installed (I assume O2 will be sharing the vodafone installed mast at this location due to O2 and Vodafone sharing agreement, I was surprised that it was a Vodafone installed mast as normally this is an O2 area for new masts)

  3. Avatar photo Optimist says:

    In NR6, I never get 4G from VM.

    1. Avatar photo Roger_Gooner says:

      If you had an EE SIM card in your phone would you get 4G?

    2. Avatar photo Optimist says:

      @Roger_Gooner – The phone tries to connect at 4G but drops down to 3G, would changing the SIM card make any difference?

  4. Avatar photo Mark says:

    No masts have been upgraded in my area, they are still 2G only, I suspect cost and backhaul are the problems, they did say at last planning application a couple of years ago that a mast had to be built closer to the town because of logistics, the company at the time said ” it’s your last chanceto get 4G coverage, but all three applications were rejected or landowners pulled out.

  5. Avatar photo Matthew says:

    In regards this in places like Wales and Scotland we do need to push rural coverage probably by more tax payers masts I expect. I still honestly can’t think of a single use for 5G on a phone myself so I won’t be upgrading to a new phone yet 4G does everything I need it to.

    1. Avatar photo Jmi says:

      Yes, but there really is a use for 4g for home broadband for those in rural areas too far from the exchange or vdsl cabinet. It must be cheaper to provide better 4g to an area than dig up roads to put in new fibre or any other alternative.

  6. Avatar photo Meadmodj says:

    There are genuine cases where 4G is still not available but with surveys like this it simply captures general perception. Sods law is that you can wander around all day in cities and towns with 4G availability and the only time you are aware it isn’t is the time you actually need it (Sat Nav, train timetable) and for whatever reason data (all speeds) is not there. The bad experience then persists either regarding these surveys or by criticising a particular provider (A is better than B).

    Most people do not understand the technologies, nor their limitations. The expectation now because of the hype is its always on and this is continuing with 5G being over hyped. Hence why we need to rethink the sharing of mobile transmitters, multiple SIM devices and public WIFI.

  7. Avatar photo mike says:

    Do you really think it will take only “several years” for 5G to match 4G coverage? That would mean it hits that coverage level quicker than 4G did, and due to the nature of 5G (high frequency, poor building penetration, and the need to have access points on every street) it will be a lot more expensive and take a lot longer to roll out than 4G. Some people may never see a 5G signal.

  8. Avatar photo Brian says:

    One obvious discrepancy in figures is between what the operators predict with their optimistic coverage maps and what people actually experience. With network/transmitter rearrangements over the last year on Three and EE, the coverage has actually deteriorated, yet the claims remain the same; and both claim coverage in the bottom of a nearby narrow steep sided valley, where the has never been any coverage.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5507)
  2. BT (3513)
  3. Politics (2534)
  4. Openreach (2296)
  5. Business (2259)
  6. Building Digital UK (2243)
  7. FTTC (2042)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1970)
  9. Statistics (1787)
  10. 4G (1662)
  11. Virgin Media (1616)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1458)
  13. Fibre Optic (1393)
  14. Wireless Internet (1388)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon