Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

ASA UK Ban BT Adverts for Misleading Guaranteed WiFi Claims

Wednesday, Mar 18th, 2020 (7:39 am) - Score 3,897
bt complete wi-fi disc repeater

Complaints from UK broadband ISPs Virgin Media, Vodafone and 11 people have resulted in several adverts for BT’s Complete WiFi (mesh system) service add-on being banned for misleadingly claiming that “only we guarantee wi-fi in every room” and “we guarantee a strong signal in every room.”

The complaints focused on two TV adverts, a press advert and a BT website promotion – all were seen in January 2019 (an old case by even ASA standards). On top of that three other people also successfully complained that one of the TV adverts for this paid add-on service, which showed somebody placing Wi-Fi discs (repeaters) around a house, didn’t clearly depict that the discs also needed to be plugged in.

In their defence BT said that they had “carried out extensive coverage testing prior to launch on a trial base of over 1000 homes” to support their claims and they added that there was only “one occasion” where they gave a customer £20 off their following bill (part of the WiFi coverage guarantee) on the basis that “they could not get Wi-Fi in every room.”

On the subject of needed to plug the WiFi repeaters into a wall socket, BT felt that “consumers generally understood that electrical items such as routers and televisions needed to be plugged in.” The ASA disagreed with BT’s defence and upheld all of the complaints.

ASA Ruling (REF: G19-1018045)

We acknowledged that the homes tested were comprised of a variety of different types of houses (detached, semi-detached, mid-terrace, flat/apartments and bungalows) and a variety of different building materials (brick, concrete and stone). However, we were concerned that there appeared to be no reliable, reproducible methodology whereby each room or the further points from the router were tested, with no data reporting which rooms of the house had been tested. The evidence did not show what speeds were being achieved on the devices, so we were unable to verify that the signal was strong enough to provide the minimum speed needed to carry out typical online activities.

Furthermore, no data was provided about the devices tested meaning that we couldn’t be sure that a representative range of devices were able to achieve a sufficient signal, whereas no data was provided about the time of day that the devices were tested meaning that we also couldn’t verify that every room of the house was able to achieve a strong Wi-Fi signal at peak times. BT also provided us with information from in-life data analytics and results from their test house. While we acknowledged that the test house data showed a huge increase in speed after one Wi-Fi disc was introduced, we could not verify from the test house data, which did not test for interference, or the in-life data that adequate speeds were consistently being achieved, including at peak times, in every room of the customers’ homes (i.e. in homes of every different layout and size).

Because the evidence provided was insufficient to prove that, barring exceptional circumstances, BT’s Complete Wi-Fi guaranteed every customer would be able to obtain a sufficient Wi-Fi signal in each room of their house, we concluded that the claim “only we guarantee wi-fi in every room” could not be substantiated, and was therefore misleading.

We noted that the [TV] ad featured a man walking up the stairs with a Wi-Fi disc in his hand and placing it on a cabinet. The ad then briefly focused on the disc on top of the cabinet. There were no visible wires attached to the disc in the man’s hand or when shown on top of the cabinet. We considered that the product was one that consumers could reasonably believe could be battery powered, and accordingly be placed anywhere around the home rather than only in locations that were near a plug socket. We therefore concluded that consumers were likely to be misled from the ad into thinking that the Wi-Fi discs could operate without needing to be plugged into a plug socket.

As usual the ASA banned BT’s adverts and told them “not to claim that they guaranteed Wi-Fi in every room unless they held adequate evidence to support the claims.” On top of that they warned the ISP “not to use visuals that suggested the Wi-Fi discs did not need to be plugged into a socket.”

Admittedly the damage is arguably long since done and the adverts themselves stopped being run a long time ago. Likewise we should point out that this is NOT the first time that BT has been in trouble for making misleading claims about their WiFi performance (here). In fairness almost all of their major broadband rivals have – at one time or another – also been in trouble for making similarly misleading claims about WiFi.

We think it would be best for everybody if all providers just avoided making any overly bold claims about WiFi performance. Such networks and devices are highly variable in their coverage and performance due to many different factors.

UPDATE 9:53am

We’ve had a response from BT, which attempts to put a different twist on the ASA’s ruling and what it means for them.

A Spokesperson for BT said:

“We guarantee that our Complete Wi-Fi customers will get Wi-Fi in every room. Unlike other providers we send our customers a new Smart Hub 2 and Wi-Fi Disc which gets a strong wi-fi signal to every room for the majority of customers across the UK.

We also go the extra mile for customers living in the biggest homes and we will happily send more Wi-Fi Discs and arrange for an engineer to visit if needed – we will always help our customers to get wi-fi to every room.

The ASA wants us to explain more clearly that we’ll also send customers £20 if they’re still not happy and we’ve changed our ads to make that more clear.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
7 Responses
  1. Avatar photo chris conder says:

    Wifi is a dark art. It is probably the bane of any ISP’s helpdesk.

    1. Avatar photo James Band says:

      The BT Premium Home Wifi system – a Triband system with a dedicated backhaul radio channel – could in theory be something worth marketing. But it doesn’t look like they have gotten it right upon release versus other Wifi 6 Mesh systems.

      It would be simpler if they made the “Stay Fast guarantee” the same as what they guarantee on Wifi. It would result in much more goodwill, a better service and preservation of customers. And it would make them money. If they are charging £10-20 more a month for these discs, when the product itself is sold for around £300+ on their website (for multiple discs) as a private purchase, then that seems a competitive “service” based on a better future proofed hardware that will able to give a better speed guarantee in the marketing.

  2. Avatar photo joe says:

    ASA bans are pretty much a joke. This one is not much different.

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      In fairness they do result in bad publicity for the operators concerned when such bans are highlighted, so there is some impact, even if there’s only very soft enforcement from the ASA itself.

    2. Avatar photo joe says:

      Strikes me the lag time for decisions is embarrassing. It need to be while out or not at all.

      Some of the decisions themselves seem pretty arbitrary and irrational. hard to keep a straight face with their inconsistent standards on fibre naming -v- in this instance a power cable.

    3. Avatar photo Stephen Wakeman says:

      I agree. It’s a waste of money on the ASA’s part. I imagine they’re underfunded like most bodies of that ilk, but still, what benefit has the provided?

      A small amount of negative publicity that is disproportionately small as compared to the number of people deemed to have been falsely advertised to as part of a national publicity campaign. Customers who are probably still in contract and bound by terms and no legal remedy for anybody who wants to end the contract on the basis of the product being falsely advertised.

      No fine. No enforcement that means anything (they’ve stopped running the ad a long time) and seemingly no consideration for them having previously being rapped across the knuckles for similar indiscretions.

      Advertising Standards? WHAT advertising standards?

  3. Avatar photo James Band says:

    BT’s Home Wifi system seems to have positive reviews (from those who purchase the system outright and use multiple discs). The marketing for the “Complete Wifi” product with a monthly fee though can be a bit confusing. Even on the BT website, you get the confusion between the “Stay Fast Guarantee” for the actual internet speed and the Wifi guarantee.

    If the Wifi guarantee was the same thing as the Stay Fast, that might be pretty decent. But it appears in the small print, that the Wifi guarantee means that it is up to BT as to how many discs you get (up to 3), and they may not even give up to 3 discs if you are getting speeds of 10Mbps, or 30Mbps (depending on the product you order) which seems a little unambitious if they are marketing a 75Mbps package, or certainly their current 330Mbps FTTP service.

    Looking at some people’s reviews on YouTube, who purchase the system, they are able to get better than 30Mbps by using multiple discs (between 3 and 6 in large houses). Of course, the Fibre speeds will mean that Triband systems (with dedicated backhaul) or the blistering fast speeds of the Amplifi Alien, or Netgear Orbi 6 could make the BT Home Wifi (or ISP router wifi) look like a joke since the Complete Wifi discs do not appear capable of supporting such high speeds.

    Certainly if they market the “Halo” or “Complete Wifi” product for the new Ultrafast packages, it wouldn’t look too good if they’ll give you one extra disc that might get 30Mbps on a 330, 500 or 1000 connection!

    Curious as to why they haven’t promoted their “BT Premium Home Wifi” system yet. That seems more future proofed with Triband wifi and would in theory allow for higher speeds. However, it doesn’t appear to have as good reviews as private products on the market.

    As far as the ASA goes, I would have thought that nobody should be allowed to market Superfast Fibre as a product when it’s based on FTTC and NOT Fibre to the Property.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5508)
  2. BT (3513)
  3. Politics (2535)
  4. Openreach (2296)
  5. Business (2260)
  6. Building Digital UK (2243)
  7. FTTC (2042)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1970)
  9. Statistics (1787)
  10. 4G (1662)
  11. Virgin Media (1617)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1458)
  13. Fibre Optic (1393)
  14. Wireless Internet (1388)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon