» ISP News » 

LG Sets THz Distance Record with Candidate 6G Mobile Network

Sunday, August 22nd, 2021 (9:05 am) - Score 2,592

A team of researchers, backed by LG Electronics (LG) and the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft research organisation, claim to have successfully demonstrated a candidate 6G mobile (mobile broadband) technology that was able to use the TeraHertz (THz) band to send data over a record outdoor distance of 100 metres.

Granted, 100 metres might not seem particularly impressive to the casual observer, but it’s actually quite a major feat. As a basic rule, lower frequency mobile spectrum bands (e.g. 700MHz) can reach further with their signals and penetrate better through walls than higher ones (e.g. 3.8GHz), but at lower frequencies there’s less spectrum spare for your data transmission (i.e. slower broadband speeds).

NOTE: The signal itself was sent between Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute (HHI) and the Berlin Institute of Technology buildings in Germany.

The idea of pushing into the THz bands with 6G is thus all about achieving incredible data speeds, with Samsung having previously indicated that they wish to target a peak (shared capacity) speed of 1Tbps (Terabits per second) and latency times of just 100 microseconds (0.1ms) for future 6G technologies (here). It sounds wonderful, yet coverage quickly becomes a major problem due to the laws of physics, but we’ll come back to that.

LG’s experiment is important because, until now, a similar transmission would have fizzled out over just 15 metres (Samsung’s test). The solution was to use better power amplification to generate a stable signal across ultra-wideband frequencies. The power amplifier is capable of generating stable signal output up to 15dBm in the frequency range between 155 – 175GHz.


LG was also successful in demonstrating adaptive beam forming technology, which alters the signal’s direction in accordance with changes to the channel and receiver position, as well as high gain antenna switching, which combines output signals of multiple power amplifiers and transmits them to specific antennas.

Dr. I.P. Park, President and CTO of LG Electronics, said:

“The success of this test demonstrates that we are ever closer to the successful application of terahertz radio communication spectrum in the upcoming 6G era. Our successful partnerships with local and global research institutions and organizations to advance the development of 6G capabilities have been very rewarding.”

As usual, such tests are often most notable for the bits of detail they leave out. In this case, they haven’t provided any information on how fast the data transmission was or what the weather conditions were, but we assume it was a clear sunny day. For all we know, the data speeds achieved might have only been at dialup levels.

The problem with all of this is that super high mobile frequencies have only very limited benefits, often via specific use cases. For example, existing 5G services also planned to use higher frequencies around 23GHz to 100GHz, but that created a clash between the laws of physics and economic reality.

At present only a few 5G operators have harnessed bands above 23GHz, and usually only in busy areas (shopping centres etc.) or for fixed wireless access (FWA) style links, because such signals are extremely weak and thus don’t travel very far. The only way to counteract that for mobile is to build a much denser and more complicated network deployment, which is extremely expensive and operators’ have thus tended to shun it.

Suffice to say that the development of 6G, by focusing so intently upon the Terahertz band, is at risk of repeating the same mistake, when it would perhaps do better to focus more of its energy on improving 5G in the under-utilised mmWave (mmW) bands first. All of this is currently the subject of some wider debate (here) and it’s not yet clear how much impact that will have on 6G development, if any.

As it stands, 6G is currently in the very early R&D phase, and it isn’t expected to become a solid standard until around 2025 (a draft standard may be defined in the 2021/22 period), with commercial launches likely to follow a few years after that. Expect the usual hype train to follow, which as with 3G, 4G and 5G before it, has often tended to be divorced from reality.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
13 Responses
  1. Phil says:

    My TV remote has been using Terahertz for decades to transmit data!

    1. Buggerlugz says:

      I bet if you put enough batteries in it, it’d reach your tv over 100m too….lol

      If 6G is having that range, I’m giving up already.

  2. CarlT says:

    This is quite interesting stuff. Fibre is a relatively controlled environment – you can fire extremely high frequencies down it, a reminder that visible light is an EM band, and not see much loss due to the medium.

    We’re still a way from hitting the limits of physics in fibre but it looks as though wireless is struggling. Need more spectrum in the low-GHz range though I imagine a fair amount of that will have to be reclaimed – satellites sit there.

  3. Consumer says:

    When “6G” reaches the UK our incumbent failing telecoms providers will still try and market us with their delightful 3Gb/month data plans.

    If mobile providers completely blocked static and video adverts at source, the existing network infrastructure might actually work.

    1. Buggerlugz says:

      That’ll be because they’ll still not have the back-haul available to provide decent 4g speeds (100Mbps 24/7) let alone 5 or 6g by then.

    2. Damien says:

      I’m on Three I did over 1.3TB last month didn’t get booted I get between 400-700 between home and work

      First time I’ve had 5G anywhere and first time I’ve even for decent service from Three

      I’m very happy with the now

  4. Peter says:

    Isn’t that frequency a bit more dangerous

    1. Lister says:

      No, it’s way.. weaker.

    2. Bubbles says:

      The way I look at it is, if you think that frequency is dangerous, you better become a vampire as visible light is stronger……

    3. Mark Jackson says:

      As Lister says, the THz band is incredibly weak (very easily blocked and disrupted), but the key point here isn’t so much the use of the band itself, but more how much power you put behind it and the antenna design. Mobile networks are required to operate at very low power levels, and that makes it difficult to turn such bands into an economically viable mobile communications solution.

  5. Ig Og says:

    Be all right until it rains.

  6. Peter says:

    6G. Can’t even get reliable 2G. High time for UK roaming to be enabled.

  7. Damien says:

    My local 5G masts (2) are about 50m away I can see them from here and I am hitting 700mbps in the middle of the day and I’ve hit 1.2Gbps at 5am.. So this should be amazing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Ultrafast ISPs
  • Vodafone £23.50 (*26.50)
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Gigaclear £24.00 (*49.00)
    Speed: 300Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £25.00 (*35.00)
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo Code: ROKUGIFT
  • Community Fibre £27.50 (*32.50)
    Speed: 200Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: First 6 Months Free
  • Virgin Media £28.00 (*52.00)
    Speed: 108Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
New Forum Topics
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Vodafone £19.50 (*22.50)
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • NOW £20.00 (*32.00)
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £20.00 (*25.00)
    Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo Code: ROKUGIFT
  • TalkTalk £21.00 (*29.95)
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Shell Energy £21.99 (*30.99)
    Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (3667)
  2. BT (3044)
  3. Politics (1975)
  4. Building Digital UK (1945)
  5. FTTC (1897)
  6. Openreach (1862)
  7. Business (1717)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1501)
  9. Statistics (1430)
  10. FTTH (1367)
  11. 4G (1295)
  12. Virgin Media (1196)
  13. Fibre Optic (1184)
  14. Wireless Internet (1176)
  15. Ofcom Regulation (1167)
  16. Vodafone (859)
  17. EE (845)
  18. 5G (792)
  19. TalkTalk (781)
  20. Sky Broadband (757)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact