Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

BDUK Publish Another Batch of Gigabit Broadband Coverage Reviews

Saturday, Jun 18th, 2022 (7:30 am) - Score 2,400
Project-Gigabit-UK-Broadband-Investment

The Building Digital UK team has today published another round of Public Reviews (PR) for the Government’s £5bn Project Gigabit broadband rollout – this time covering West Yorkshire and Parts of North Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Nottinghamshire and West of Lincolnshire, Leicestershire and Warwickshire in England.

In case anybody has forgotten, the project seeks to ensure that a minimum of 85%+ of UK premises can access a gigabit-capable (1Gbps+) broadband ISP connection by the end of 2025, before reaching “at least” 99% by the end of 2030 (here and here). The public investment (£1.2bn has been released so far) is focused on serving the final 20% of the UK (5-6 million premises), where the private sector has failed to deliver (i.e. the hardest to reach rural and some sub-urban areas).

NOTE: Commercial builds alone – mostly in urban areas – have already pushed gigabit coverage to 66% of UK premises (here), and they’ll reach 80%+ by the end of 2025 without public investment.

In England the new programme is centrally managed and that explains why these consultations are all being run by BDUK, rather than local authorities. The first step – before procurements can begin and contracts are awarded – is to identify precisely which areas are not expected to benefit from gigabit speeds under existing commercial builds, which covers related plans for the next 3 years. Only once you have the answer to that, can you identify where public funding will be needed to help address market failure.

The new reviews cover several regions across England under the Project Gigabit programme. Most of the details for these areas, including those from earlier phases, have already been revealed, but the final Public Reviews should confirm the exact intervention areas. We’ve summarised the latest additions below.

NOTE: The Public Review process aims to validate the outcome of earlier Open Mark Reviews (OMR) and BDUK’s mapping, hence PRs are the final review stage before procurement. In addition, the PRs below enable us to see the outcome of earlier OMRs (i.e. how many premises will need support).

The June 2022 Batch of Public Reviews for England

West Yorkshire and Parts of North Yorkshire (Lot 8)

The OMR indicated that planned commercial coverage for gigabit-capable broadband would reach approximately 875,929 premises, and would therefore leave the remaining 490,413 premises without access to gigabit-capable broadband.

Estimated contract commencement date: Nov 23 – Jan 24
Indicative contract value: £128 million – £218 million
Estimated number of uncommercial premises: 125,200

South Yorkshire (Lot 20)

The OMR indicated that planned commercial coverage for gigabit-capable broadband would reach approximately 399,283 premises, and would therefore leave the remaining 355,086 premises without access to gigabit-capable broadband.

Estimated contract commencement date: Nov 23 – Jan 24
Indicative contract value: £59 million – £103 million
Estimated number of uncommercial premises: 56,800

Nottinghamshire and West of Lincolnshire (Lot 10)

The OMR indicated that planned commercial coverage for gigabit-capable broadband would reach approximately 471,501 premises, and would therefore leave the remaining 211,744 premises without access to gigabit-capable broadband.

Estimated contract commencement date: Nov 23 – Jan 24
Indicative contract value: £90 million – £152 million
Estimated number of uncommercial premises: 89,700

Leicestershire and Warwickshire (Lot 11)

The OMR indicated that planned commercial coverage for gigabit-capable broadband would reach approximately 727,245 premises, and would therefore leave the remaining 362,772 premises without access to gigabit-capable broadband.

Estimated contract commencement date: Nov 23 – Jan 24
Indicative contract value: £114 million – £194 million
Estimated number of uncommercial premises: 112,900

All of the above Public Reviews are due to run from today until 5pm on 18th July 2022. Some readers will also notice that the “estimated number of uncommercial premises” above differs significantly from the OMR figure for “remaining premises without access to gigabit-capable broadband,” which is because the prior OMR figure also includes “Under Review” premises into the total (i.e. premises where suppliers have reported planned commercial broadband coverage, but where those plans have been judged through the OMR as potentially being at risk of not being completed).

In addition, any suppliers (network builders) that failed or were not yet ready with their plans to respond to the earlier OMR phase can still respond via the final PR phase in order to be included. This is important because the current market is rapidly evolving, with new networks and deployment plans seeming to crop up quite frequently.

We should point out that BDUK recently launched a new Rolling National Open Market Review process (these will be run three times a year – i.e. January, May and September), which should in the future make it easier for them to keep track of new developments in commercial builds of gigabit broadband networks. But in the meantime, they still have to run through the existing OMR and PR process.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
17 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Taras says:

    Just how many times do they need to “map” once, twice or 3 times.

  2. Avatar photo Jason says:

    interesting… my street got connected by openreach and works were under way from cityfibre… the data related to my post code is outdated already as it states that the premises are under review… I guess OR needed to move quickly (they also told me that it would be ready to order in November when I checked a few months ago – but it is available now already). Can’t complain at least

  3. Avatar photo simon says:

    So when mine line went in I got the first £2800 taken off the civil works cost – was this BT claiming a voucher or just them paying for it upfront? I am in an above area. I’m curious so to who actually covers the cost.

    1. Avatar photo John says:

      Most likely you and me and every other taxpayer since they got a huge amount of money to burn

    2. Avatar photo An Engineer says:

      If this line actually existed you’d know the answer to this as it’s in the itemisation and explanatory notes.

    3. Avatar photo simon says:

      It does exist..

      This is what it says directly from the Survey e-mail from OR..

      Item Quantity Unit Cost (£) Total (£)
      Drilling external wall 1 31.97 31.97
      Provision of small footway box 1 817.86 817.86
      Solid fibre cable 455M 5.55 2525.25
      Surveys 1 247.08 247.08
      Total 3622.16
      Any reductions 2800
      Total Excess Construction Charges 822.16

      I simply asked who paid for the “Any reductions” Bit

      Good Day 🙂

    4. Avatar photo Alex A says:

      It will be thr BDUK gigabit voucher, local authorities can top it up to bring the amount it can pay for up.

    5. Avatar photo simon says:

      Thank you Alex.

      Now I know 🙂

    6. Avatar photo An Engineer says:

      The £2800 isn’t a voucher.

      I stand corrected to an extent. There is evidently an ECC charges list, it just isn’t yours.

      You mostly use Three both here and on TBB when posting under your Buggs8 / Username26 guises. The times you seem to use a private line it most definitely isn’t yours. 🙂

    7. Avatar photo Well Well says:

      @An Engineer – It was only a survey email not an invoice.

    8. Avatar photo simon says:

      Is it not mine?

      I think you will find it is 🙂
      @Carl – sorry I mean @An Engineer

      No I don’t post under any of those – nor do I care what you think. I am amazed you know what ISP’s I don’t use on another website’s forum.. Interesting you suggest that both this site and TBB leak information. I am sure the site owner can confirm/deny that.

      @Well Well – Yes and one I paid in order to get the line in. I had to pay the £822 which I did – and it eventually took just over 6 months to get everything done – I even have my own telegraph pole at the end of the road – funky eh?

    9. Avatar photo An Engineer says:

      You didn’t pay the £822.

      Your comment about having your own telegraph pole undid you as your embellishments often do. ECCs aren’t confirmed until the installation is complete so even if the pole was erected in lieu of other activities it would’ve completely changed the costs and would’ve been reflected in the actual invoice and payment due.

      Oops.

    10. Avatar photo An Engineer says:

      This never actually was answered properly, was it?

      Every EAD carries a £548 connection charge. Openreach pool these and use them to fund the exemption on the first £2,800 of ECCs.

      No taxpayer involvement at all.

    11. Avatar photo simon says:

      I did pay that actually. I paid it on receipt of that email and I was given 10 working days to go ahead or pull out. I went ahead.

      Oddly enough I can see the pole.. and this is what my ISP said at the time.

      “It seems they’ve uncovered 5 blockages in the area that need to be cleared, as well as provisioning for a new pole to be erected as well in the area, which has obviously slowed things down.”

      Followed by

      “New update from today:

      Civils work has been successfully completed and the next steps will be the Fibre work.

      Pretty much confirming the pole was part of the works and is all done, next is more fibre works, I’ll let you know when the next update comes through.

      The pole is LOS and I watched as they did the joining and other stuff to that pole.

      End of the day I know what I have – and I know what I pay for.

  4. Avatar photo simon says:

    Oh and even if it turns out not to be Carl – the Police will be visiting him anyway –
    God bless the internet – amazing when you want to find 18 things 🙂

    1. Avatar photo An Engineer says:

      I can’t speak for whomever lives at the address you’ve allegedly sent the police to but making false reports is a crime just FYI.

    2. Avatar photo simon says:

      Actually it’s not – and no you can’t but luckily you can be traced and they can come speak with you too 🙂

      I’ll get there in the end.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Sky Broadband UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5525)
  2. BT (3518)
  3. Politics (2541)
  4. Openreach (2298)
  5. Business (2264)
  6. Building Digital UK (2246)
  7. FTTC (2044)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1975)
  9. Statistics (1789)
  10. 4G (1666)
  11. Virgin Media (1621)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1463)
  13. Fibre Optic (1395)
  14. Wireless Internet (1390)
  15. FTTH (1382)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon