Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Broadband Forum Push Home ISPs to Adopt Low Latency L4S Technology

Thursday, Sep 19th, 2024 (10:18 am) - Score 1,160
ip address Fiber optic cables for backbone lines on blue network background

The Broadband Forum has launched a new roadmap that they hope will aid ISPs in implementing the new Low Latency, Low Loss and Scalable Throughput (L4S) technology, which has the potential to improve network latency times for popular UK internet activities like online video games, video conferencing, cloud gaming and so forth.

Network latency is a measure of the time that it takes for a packet of data to travel from your computer to a remote server and then back again (ping). The delay is measured in milliseconds, and modern broadband connections will often have an average latency of anything from around c.4ms to 40ms (what is normal for your connection will depend on lots of different factors).

NOTE: 1000 milliseconds (ms) = 1 second.

The shortest time is always best for latency, although the times can be affected by various things, such as the performance of remote internet servers, the connection technology being used, network congestion, peering / routing problems and the setup of your own home network etc. But consumers with Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) connections can usually expect some of the best latency times of c.2-10ms.

Advertisement

However, there’s always room for improvement, which is why L4S is now being given more of a push. The new technology is based on the knowledge that the root cause of queuing delay (i.e. when packets wait idly in buffers across the network, for instance in routers and modems, before being forwarded) is in the capacity-seeking congestion controllers of senders, not in the queue itself.

L4S attempts to move away from the congestion control algorithms that sometimes cause substantial queuing delay and instead adopt a new class of congestion controls, which seek capacity with very little queuing. The new technology introduces immediate congestion feedback from network bottlenecks as soon as data packets begin to queue, which when combined with a scalable congestion control scheme on the sending hosts can result in lower latency.

Companies and operators like Vodafone, Apple, Nokia and Intel have been increasingly pushing for wider adoption of L4S since it was specified by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) last year. The Broadband Forum is now establishing a roadmap to help show operators and service providers how to implement L4S.

As L4S does not require implementation across the whole network to start to deliver benefits, Broadband Forum’s project will support phased implementations of the technology that focus on the most beneficial parts of the network first, on the journey to a full end-to-end support.

Advertisement

Jonathan Newton, Vodafone and Access and Transport Architecture Work Area Director at Broadband Forum, said:

“We’re keenly aware that low and stable latency, along with high throughput, is fundamental to broadband performance for many interactive applications used in the home. This is especially true to ensure immersive experiences for applications like cloud gaming, and we’re confident this project will help providers deliver new benefits to pass onto their customers.

Broadband Forum is uniquely positioned to define how to implement L4S capability into a broadband network as a number of key congestion points are in our scope of work and we look forward to supporting the industry tackle a key pain-point for modern network applications.”

One key factor in all this is that L4S is good at handling latency in a more congested network environment, which is important because network congestion often results in rising levels of packet loss and slower latency times (e.g. video games often experience this as lag in online multiplayer games). But by tackling the causes of this issue, end-users are more likely to enjoy a smoother experience.

At present this is mostly being implemented alongside more modern FTTP broadband and 5G mobile networks, although it’s still a fairly new technology and so hasn’t yet been widely adopted.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
4 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo henry says:

    DOCSIS supports L4S today, through LLD. LLD is an addition to DOCSIS, so not equipment support it yet, but when it does and the operator enables it…

    1. Avatar photo Name says:

      so how this will affect DOCSIS? Will drop from 10-14ms to 6-10ms to the first hop?

  2. Avatar photo henry says:

    L4S operates at a different level, so it doesn’t have any impact on latencies specific to DOCSIS. DOCSIS just supports it (2nd queue and congestion feedback). The rest is up to the endpoints (the transport protocol).

  3. Avatar photo RaptorX says:

    FYI the theoretical limit for latency reduction is the speed of light, which is the minimum ping time possible. So, the further apart the server is to the user, the longer it will take and hence a slower ping.

    Network equipment is much slower than this however, so there’s still lots of room for improvement, but a server half way round the planet (the furthest possible) will still take noticeably longer to respond simply due to that large distance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching or random moderation checks by the anti-spam system.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £25.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £25.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £26.50 - 27.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Brsk UK ISP Logo
Brsk £19.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £22.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5906)
  2. BT (3617)
  3. Politics (2677)
  4. Business (2392)
  5. Openreach (2382)
  6. Building Digital UK (2311)
  7. Mobile Broadband (2099)
  8. FTTC (2073)
  9. Statistics (1870)
  10. 4G (1771)
  11. Virgin Media (1721)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1552)
  13. Fibre Optic (1454)
  14. Wireless Internet (1444)
  15. FTTH (1384)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon