Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

New Draft Ofcom Code Brings UK TV Video Streaming Under their Gaze

Thursday, May 14th, 2026 (7:28 am) - Score 2,360
Streaming broadband video between two hands

The UK telecoms and media regulator, Ofcom, has today published a new Draft Code of Practice for internet and broadband based video streaming services (e.g. Netflix, Amazon / Prime, Disney+ etc.), which will require them to follow new rules, including around harm and offence, due impartiality and accuracy, fairness and privacy, and accessibility.

In case anybody was unaware. The Government recently passed the Media Act 2024, which was aimed at modernising the country’s broadcasting regulations and expanding them to cover video-on-demand services. Since then Ofcom has proposed various changes, such as measures to ensure that internet connected TV platforms make UK Public Service Broadcasters’ (PSBs) content more prominent (here) and expanding the range of streaming / connected TV platforms where their rules should apply (here).

NOTE: The UK has one of the most successful creative sectors in the world – it is worth £124 billion (over 5% of the UK economy), with film, TV, music and radio contributing £22 billion.

The goal is generally to align existing regulations for streaming services with those of traditional public service broadcasters, so viewers “receive similar protections, regardless of how and where they watch“. The new Draft Code being consulted upon today is the latest development on that road, which introduces a range of new rules governing major streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Disney+.

Advertisement

These platforms will, for the first time, thus be held to content standards similar to those already in place for traditional broadcasters. That includes rules around harmful and offensive content, fairness and privacy, and due impartiality and due accuracy in news. Alongside this, Ofcom are also consulting on a proposed Code setting strict new accessibility requirements for streaming services.

Cristina Nicolotti Squires, Ofcom’s Group Director for Broadcasting and Media, said:

“Audiences today want to watch great content across different on-demand platforms with the same reassurance and confidence they have when viewing traditional broadcast television.

Our proposed new content standards Code for the largest and most popular streaming services will, for the first time, deliver the clear and consistent protections that audiences need and expect. We’re also making sure that people with sight and hearing conditions can also enjoy popular streaming content by setting strong new accessibility requirements.”

Summary of Key Changes

➤ Protection of under 18s: Services will be required to comply with existing obligations to protect young audiences from material which may be harmful to them. Our proposed new Code also includes enhanced protections focused on preserving the welfare and legal rights of under-18s who appear in programmes.

➤ Harm and offence: Our proposed rules do not prohibit potentially harmful or offensive material. They will, however, require services to provide adequate protection to viewers from potential harm, and offence to be justified by context – with emphasis on enabling informed viewing choices through clear content information and warnings. We are also proposing to require exceptional editorial justification for including explicit detail about novel or unusual suicide methods.

➤ Crime, disorder, hatred and abuse: We propose rules to supplement the existing requirements on incitement to crime/disorder, abusive treatment and portrayals of criminal techniques and proceedings.

➤ Due impartiality and due accuracy: Our proposed rules for news largely carry over those already set out in the Broadcasting Code. For non-news content – including current affairs programmes – we propose to adapt the relevant impartiality requirements for the on-demand environment, such as maintaining giving services the flexibility to maintain due impartiality across multiple programmes.

➤ Fairness and privacy: We are proposing to maintain the same level of protection of individuals or organisations from unfair treatment or unwarranted infringement of privacy in content on streaming services as we do for linear broadcast content.

➤ New accessibility requirements code: Services must, as a minimum, subtitle 80% of their catalogue, audio describe 10% and provide signing for 5%. Poor quality access features will not count towards quotas. The Code also sets out how Ofcom expect services to meet their obligations to keep audiences informed about their accessibility features, and how they must report annually on their quality and usability.

In addition, Ofcom has opened a new Call for Evidence to help inform their approach to investigating possible breaches of the content standards Code for streaming services. Otherwise, Ofcom’s new consultations will give audiences, broadcasters and streaming services the opportunity to share their views on the changes, which must be submitted by 7th August 2026. If all goes well then the regulator should be able to table a final code by the end of 2026.

The changes that the regulator are making above naturally flow into the wider and often-divisive debate over the future of TV distribution in general (here), such as the question of at which point it may become necessary to start switching off the old terrestrial signals in favour of a broadband-only (IP-based) delivery model. Not to mention future funding and the TV licence fee, which is always a “fun” topic and still the subject of much debate.

The PSBs currently support a transition to IPTV in the 2030s as it is becoming increasingly challenging “to bear double costs from running multiple distribution platforms”. However, without intervention, by 2040, some 5% of homes (1.5 million) are currently forecast to still be relying on digital terrestrial television via the airwaves. Ofcom is of the view that the time for decisions is now upon us.

Advertisement

NOTE: The Tier 1 services that will have to follow these Codes are defined by the Government as those with more than 500,000 UK users. Services used by ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, S4C and STV to stream PSB content will also come under Tier 1 regulation. BBC iPlayer is not a Tier 1 service. It is already, and will continue to be, regulated under the Broadcasting Code. However, Ofcom are also proposing to apply the new Tier 1 Accessibility Code to relevant BBC UK public on demand services.

Consultation: Tier 1 Standards Code
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/video-on-demand/consultation-tier-1-standards-code

Consultation: Tier 1 Accessibility Code
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/accessibility/tier-1-accessibility-code

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
14 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo john_r says:

    Wonderful news for Mary Whitehouse types.

    1. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

      You are showing your age 🙂

  2. Avatar photo Big Dave says:

    Another excuse for Ofcom to make a lot of noise and basically do F.A.

  3. Avatar photo tonyp says:

    Looks like there could be a blooming of small streamers with back parlour video servers somewhat akin to the pirate radio stations (oh happy memories) of the sixties and the specialist illegal local FM radio broadcasters of the 80’s. Then Ofcom will have to do a whack-a-mole involving ISP’s and/or VPN detection. Just sayin’

    1. Avatar photo simon says:

      You mean diodgy IPTV? yup that’s a thing too.

      Only uou don’t actually get put in prison for not having a TV Licence, It’s 2 years for the former and apprently plod is doing it’s bidding to kick the doors in of Doug with a dodgy firestick

  4. Avatar photo John says:

    This is evil because it opens the door that since these companies are under the umbrella of ofcom now they deserve to steal people’s money

    This government ran on the promise of cutting people’s bills but now they want to tack on the BBC tax to someone who casually watches Netflix, therefore doubling the cost of it

    Hopefully the US congress wakes up and prevents American companies from being compelled to do stupid things for compliance with banana republics filled with a parasitic technocratic class such as the UK and many EU countries

    1. Avatar photo Big Dave says:

      The US Congress does not make British laws. If Netflix & Co wish to carry out any commercial activity (ie collect user subscriptions) in the UK (or any country for that matter) then they are required to comply with the laws of that country.

    2. Avatar photo John says:

      If congress has no power to protect their companies then why does ofcom, a british quango, have any power to fine companies that don’t even operate in the UK like 4chan?

      The pendulum has swung too far in the authoritarian direction, the blowback will come soon, in the form of the GRANITE act and the free speech bill being proposed in Britain

    3. Avatar photo tonyp says:

      A bit off topic but ‘the great State of California’ https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/bill/TextClient.xhtml?bill_id=20252026AB1043 (and Brazil) have legislated that operating systems shall require registration and age controls to protect minors from excessive screen time or undesirable content. If that gets embedded in Android, Windows, ChromeOS, MacOS, Linux then that would have to spread worldwide. Personally I don’t think that is workable for those in the know (e.g. developers, hackers). Also edge systems that have multiple users would be difficult to see whom is using the device. But those measures would probably be a gift to legislators/regulators who want control.

    4. Avatar photo john_r says:

      Yep Apple have already rolled this out on iOS in the UK. I can see it coming to Windows, Android and other proprietary operating systems quite soon. I don’t think this is enforceable on Linux – especially where it’s actual age verification (Brazil/UK) and not just attestation (Cali). That said if we are going to have AV then it’s better at device level than every random website asking for it. In my case I already had a credit card on file with Apple so didn’t have to give them any additional information. Of course we could just have parents parent but I know that is asking too much these days.

  5. Avatar photo Retro says:

    “offence”

    A totally subjective and meaningless term.

  6. Avatar photo SicOf says:

    Oh wow another Ofcon spin session, maybe they could get arround to incorporating Email into their ‘communications’ remit. Fairness – er the assenine pricing increase rules they spouted out, it’d have worked out better if they’d not botherd doing anything chronically late after the coulpe of years post the high cpi rates, that was a really delinquent consumer fairness debacle that anyone with an iq over 60 saw as a farce, really just ‘protecting’ the ISPs rather than consumers.

  7. Avatar photo Rik says:

    Coming soon, I see age verification and mandatory pin codes for certain shows, which cannot he disabled even for those of us who don’t have under 18s living with us.

  8. Avatar photo Josh Welby says:

    Like with Sky Q you mean

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £22.99
145Mbps
Gift: £140 Reward Card
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £23.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
BT UK ISP Logo
BT £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: £120 BT Reward Card
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
giffgaff UK ISP Logo
giffgaff £14.00
Contract: 18 Months
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £15.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Rewild Mobile UK ISP Logo
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £16.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Zzoomm UK ISP Logo
Zzoomm £21.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact