Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Q4 2016 – UK Government Brings Superfast Broadband to 4.3 Million Premises

Thursday, February 16th, 2017 (12:33 pm) - Score 762

The Government’s national Broadband Delivery UK programme has today announced that some 4,309,668 additional homes and businesses in the United Kingdom can now order a “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) service as a result of their £1.6bn+ public investment.

At present around 92% of premises in the United Kingdom can access a fixed line superfast broadband connection and Phase Two of the BDUK project aims to push this to 95% by 2017/18, before possibly rising up to around 97% by 2020. The rest are likely to be catered for by alternative networks (altnets) and the forthcoming 10Mbps Universal Service Obligation (USO).

Take note that, prior to BDUK, the commercial market (purely private investment) had already enabled operators like BT and Virgin Media to expand the reach of superfast Internet services to around 70% of the country. However, the major operators’ tend to view the final 30% as being “not commercially viable” and so the BDUK programme was setup to offer support via state aid.

So far most of Phase One (90% of the UK) and Phase Two (95% of the UK) have been supported by Openreach’s (BT) deployment of ‘up to’ 80Mbps Fibre-to-the-Cabinet (FTTC) and some ultrafast Fibre-to-the-Premise (FTTP) technology, as well as a little work from alternative operators like Gigaclear, AB Internet, Call Flow and UKB Networks etc.

However the future expansion beyond 95% will almost certainly involve greater input from alternative network (altnet) ISPs like those mentioned above, which is partly because BT would find it increasingly difficult to cater for such remote areas where the economic model can become prohibitively expensive for a traditional commercial operator.

Q4 2016 Progress Report

The “premises passed” figure used below only reflects those able to order “superfast” speeds of 24Mbps+ as a result of the BDUK project (i.e. it excludes those that have benefited but which would receive sub-24Mbps speeds). They also exclude “overspill effects” of BDUK-supported projects on premises which already have superfast broadband available.

Likewise the following table only reflects state aid from the Government (BDUK) and does NOT include match-funding from local councils, the EU and other public or even private sources.

bduk broadband performance update q4 2016

The headline figures used above are said to be cash based (i.e. when grants are made or budgets transferred). On an accruals basis, which matches costs incurred to the timing of delivery, cumulative BDUK expenditure to the end of 2016 has been estimated as £548,074,780 and that equates to 7,863 premises covered per £million of BDUK expenditure (expenditure is higher for this because the work has been delivered in advance of payment).

Admittedly the roll-out pace has slowed somewhat since the early years, although this is to be expected because the programme is now concentrating on the most challenging rural and some tedious sub-urban locations (e.g. Exchange Only Lines). Related areas take longer to reach, often cost more and deliver fewer premises passed in the same space of time.

One other final point to make is that future deployment phases, such as those aiming to deliver coverage above 95%, will also be adopting the slightly improved 30Mbps+ definition for “superfast broadband“. The EU and Ofcom have been using this definition for 6 years, although official BDUK contracts have been a bit slow to adopt the same approach.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
5 Responses
  1. Avatar gerarda says:

    It is a pity the cost is not shown on an accruals basis as the raw figures appear to show the hard to reach premises cost less to connect than the easier ones.

    1. Avatar gerarda says:

      If we go back only a year then the accruals figures quoted in http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/02/broadband-deliver-uk-office-publish-performance-report-for-q4-2015.html start to make the numbers look more sensible

      To December 2015 the number of premises per £1m was 8191, it is now 7863, meaning the last 12 months only covered 6487 per £1m, an increase of 26%.

  2. Avatar Fastman says:

    it could also be that these include some of early Phase 2 deployments which are fiddly but close to network and therefore have been picked up in the latest figure — as opposed to massively hard and miles from anywhere

  3. Avatar Steve Jones says:

    I wonder to what extent the operation of gain-share/clawback will mean these figures are somewhat distorted? If they reflect the payments made to the local BDUK projects as they grants have been made to BT then presumably these numbers can’t reflect any money which has been returned to the local project under that scheme (or which BT has recognised will be returned via their deferrals). I don’t suppose we can possibly know at this stage, as there is surely more to come. There have now been quite a few local projects which have announced extensions based on the reinvestment fund and, presumably, quite a few more to come yet.

    Perhaps we won’t know unless/until the NAO do a final wrap-up report on the whole exercise.

  4. Avatar George says:

    Out of interest, does the 92% include premises in FTTC-enabled areas, but whose local cabinets are out of capacity?

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £22.00
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Onestream £22.49 (*29.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*36.52)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £55 Reward Card
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2823)
  2. BT (2795)
  3. FTTC (1794)
  4. Building Digital UK (1760)
  5. Politics (1689)
  6. Openreach (1643)
  7. Business (1457)
  8. FTTH (1341)
  9. Mobile Broadband (1255)
  10. Statistics (1253)
  11. 4G (1080)
  12. Fibre Optic (1072)
  13. Wireless Internet (1037)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1029)
  15. Virgin Media (1021)
  16. EE (713)
  17. Vodafone (683)
  18. Sky Broadband (676)
  19. TalkTalk (674)
  20. 5G (538)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact