Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

TeraHertz Transmitter Delivers 105Gbps Wireless Speeds via Single Channel

Tuesday, February 7th, 2017 (9:12 am) - Score 2,123
wireless_wifi_and_lan_computer_network

A team of Japanese scientists have developed a TeraHertz (THz) transmitter that is capable of transmitting digital data at a rate of 105Gbps (Gigabits per second) over a single channel using the 300GHz band, which they claim could power a future generation of Mobile Broadband and Satellite links.

At present most WiFi and 4G Mobile networks prefer to use spectrum in the lower frequency bands of between around 800MHz and 4GHz, while future 5G services will also be able to make use of the higher frequencies up to around 100GHz (note: various 5G solutions have been tested with everything from 800MHz to 73GHz).

Higher frequencies offer a lot of spectrum for carrying more data but related signals also struggle to travel very far and can easily be disrupted, which means that operators need to build a much more complicated / expensive network with lots of distribution points in order to overcome the limitations. Even then there are big question marks over how viable 5G’s predicted speeds (up to 20Gbps – provisional specification) will become outside of the big cities.

Over the past 2-3 years we’ve also seen a growing investment in the development of wireless communications using the even higher frequency TeraHertz (THz) band, such as this one where a team demonstrated a 160Gbps wireless transmission by using one THz emitter and modulating 25GHz spaced 8 channels (20 Gbps per channel) in the 300-500GHz band. At the end of last year another team also achieved something similar (here).

Now a team of scientists working at Hiroshima University and Panasonic claim to have developed a THz transmitter that can push data speeds of 105Gbps over just a single channel in the 300GHz band (using the frequency range from 290GHz to 315GHz), which is a major step forward (here).

Prof. Minoru Fujishima, Hiroshima University, said:

“This year, we developed a transmitter with 10 times higher transmission power than the previous version’s. This made the per-channel data rate above 100 Gbit/s at 300 GHz possible. We usually talk about wireless data rates in megabits per second or gigabits per second. But we are now approaching terabits per second using a plain simple single communication channel.

Fibre optics realized ultrahigh-speed wired links, and wireless links have been left far behind. Terahertz could offer ultrahigh-speed links to satellites as well, which can only be wireless. That could, in turn, significantly boost in-flight network connection speeds, for example.

Another, completely new possibility offered by terahertz wireless is high-data-rate minimum-latency communications. Optical fibers are made of glass and the speed of light slows down in fibers. That makes fiber optics inadequate for applications requiring real-time responses. Today, you must make a choice between ‘high data rate’ (fiber optics) and ‘minimum latency’ (microwave links). You can’t have them both. But with terahertz wireless, we could have light-speed minimum-latency links supporting fiber-optic data rates.”

All of this sounds wonderful, but as usual there are some fairly sizeable catches to the promised performance improvement and as usual the press release doesn’t really touch on any of them. The biggest caveat is distance and indeed many such lab tests have measured the distance of their THz transmissions in centimetres, which is somewhat limiting.

A few teams are now starting to talk in terms of metres, but right now anything up to 10 metres can be a real stretch to achieve and even a big improvement over that still won’t cut it for Mobile communications. The idea of using THz for Satellite links is another highly contentious one because light cloud and rain could easily cause havoc.

Granted a point-to-point Satellite link could conceivably boost its power much more than would be viable for a traditional Mobile network and this might overcome some of the extreme signal attenuation, but even so it’s a daunting task to tackle the very significant physics challenges involved. Not to mention that shrinking all of this down into a portable piece of kit (e.g. Smartphone) is unlikely to be feasible anytime soon.

On the other hand if you would have asked somebody 20 years ago, back when 56kbps dialup modems were cutting edge, whether it would have been possible to send 300Mbps down 200-300 metres of thin copper wire then they would have laughed you out of the room. Today G.fast can do that and so perhaps in the future solutions will be found to make THz based Mobile Broadband and Satellite a reality.

The Japanese team has taken us a big step forward, but they’re still near the bottom of a rather tall staircase. But at least they’re on the staircase rather than just looking at it.

NOTE: At this point somebody usually cries “Radiation.. health danger! Waaaaa!” or something to that affect. However THz are non-ionizing, which means that its photons are not usually energetic enough to knock electrons off atoms and molecules in human tissue (i.e. it shouldn’t be harmful to human health and that’s another reason why using THz is attractive).

Delicious
Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he is also the founder of ISPreview since 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
3 Responses
  1. Chris P

    One day people will think it odd we once plugged things in together to get them to communicate or draw power.

    A bit like how people don’t understand that line rental pays for the bb line too, or how people once relied on a linear recording system for video and audio.

  2. talkingtelephones

    That’s assuming we all have not died from cancer…

    NOTE: At this point somebody usually cries “Radiation.. health danger! Waaaaa!” or something to that affect. However THz are non-ionizing, which means that its photons are not usually energetic enough to knock electrons off atoms and molecules in human tissue (i.e. it’s shouldn’t be harmful to human health and that’s another reason why using THz is attractive).

    Note the use of the terms “not usually” and “shouldn’t be harmful”

  3. John Evans

    Terahertz transmitters are no new we were working on them some 20 years ago at Marconi in the UK. The new bit is the modulation bandwidth. One issue that is not mentioned here is the power level generated and the range that can be achieved. It is very difficult to generate lots of power with typically mW being achieved. So high gain antennas are used. A high gain dish antenna would have a very narrow beamwidth so pointing accuracy would be critical. These frequencies are really not that practical for mobile communications and that is why most mobiles operate at the 0.1% of the frequency mentioned here.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £17.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Code: ONLINEDEAL
  • Vodafone £21.00 (*23.00)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.50
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £23.99 (*34.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • First Utility £24.99 (*31.99)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
Poll
*Javascript must be ON to vote*
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2242)
  2. FTTP (1673)
  3. FTTC (1481)
  4. Broadband Delivery UK (1465)
  5. Openreach (1194)
  6. Politics (1191)
  7. Business (1066)
  8. Statistics (943)
  9. Fibre Optic (863)
  10. Mobile Broadband (856)
  11. Ofcom Regulation (790)
  12. Wireless Internet (780)
  13. FTTH (769)
  14. 4G (746)
  15. Virgin Media (725)
  16. Sky Broadband (536)
  17. TalkTalk (511)
  18. EE (491)
  19. Vodafone (382)
  20. Security (364)
New Forum Topics
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms  ,  Privacy and Cookie Policy  ,  Links  ,  Website Rules