
The UK telecoms and internet content regulator, Ofcom, has revealed they’re using an unidentified third-party monitoring tool – seemingly with AI capabilities – to track the public’s use of Virtual Private Network (VPN) tools as part of Government concerns that they’re being used to circumvent internet censorship measures under the Online Safety Act (OSA).
In case anybody has forgotten. VPN usage recently jumped after Ofcom began enforcing Age Verification measures across the internet as part of the OSA, which was sold to the public by the government as being intended to restrict access to porn.
However, the measures also ended up going much further and resulted in a heap of regular online services all suddenly wanting to scan your face and collect credit card details (among other methods) – often via unfamiliar third parties – before allowing access (e.g. messaging services, social media, online games, music streaming, TikTok etc.).
Advertisement
The change, which has been seen by some as indicative of the UK’s slow slide towards digital authoritarianism, occurred at a time when most of us have long been conditioned to share as little personal and financial data as possible with online platforms (especially social networks, where real names aren’t always used) – due partly to the all-too-common risk of data breaches.
Suffice to say, many adults did NOT want to have to share personal or financial details with unknown third-parties just to be able to chat with family members/business contacts or listen to the latest music, among other things. But the government’s sledgehammer approach leaves few alternatives, potentially fuelling the risk from cybercrime and making it harder for people to control who has access to their data.
One recent data breach, which was linked to online voice provider Discord helps to underline these points (here). The breach exposed government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users after hackers compromised a third-party company contracted for age verification.
In response, many people have been flocking to adopt VPN services in order to avoid age verification (e.g. using them to change the geographic location of their active IP address and mask the real connection). The UK government promptly responded to this by warning that online platforms which “deliberately target UK children and promote [Virtual Private Network] use” could now “face enforcement action, including significant financial penalties“.
Advertisement
Several government MPs have even called for the nuclear option of banning VPNs to stop circumvention of the rules (here), although officially the government says there are “no current plans to ban the use of VPNs“. But the option is still said to remain on the table, and we all know that plans can change, often suddenly (“no plans” is the most abused / changeable term in the PR arsenal).
Some recent probing by TechRadar has now revealed that Ofcom are using an unidentified and seemingly AI powered (inferred from language in the comment below) third-party tool to track the public’s use of VPNs.
On the one hand, it’s not surprising that the regulator would be looking at VPN usage, given their role. But what is concerning is the lack of transparency involved in their approach and Ofcom’s seeming refusal to identify who they’re working with (i.e. people may wish to know if this is a company with a track record of protecting people’s privacy, or more associated with the use of invasive surveillance techniques).
As the website says, the fact that a regulator is using tools (and thus presumably spending money and resources) to specifically track the public’s use of software designed to enhance digital privacy is a concern that risks undermining their very purpose as a privacy tool.
Advertisement
A spokesperson for Ofcom said:
“We use a leading third-party provider, which is widely used in the industry, to gather information on VPN usage. The provider combines multiple data sources to train its models and generate usage estimates. The data we access and use in our analyses is fully aggregated at the app level, and no personally identifiable or user-level information is ever included.”
The regulator’s CEO, Dame Melanie Dawes, last month revealed (Open Letter to the Government) that, “following the 25th July deadline we saw a spike in their use – with UK daily active users of VPN apps temporarily doubling to around 1.5 million. However, usage has since plateaued, and has now fallen back to around 1 million by the end of September“.
However, as above, there remains a lack of transparency over how the regulator came up with this number. Ofcom previously said that the key question they will be monitoring (though they admit “it is hard to measure“) is whether VPN use is rising among children.
Data from Internet Matters, collected before July, suggests that around one in ten under-18s used VPNs, with use skewing towards older teenagers. No surprise there – this is the group likely to feel most aggrieved by the new approach, since there are few things more annoying than being 15-18 years old and yet treated like you’re 5.
At present both of the largest political parts remain fully supportive of the OSA and thus it’s difficult to imagine that the Government will roll back any of its measures (if anything, they seem to be extending it). Meanwhile, many online services will feel that the risk of being legally liable for not going far enough is something they cannot countenance and will thus continue to adopt such strict measures.
Please note that we won’t be able to approve any comments on this news article if they promote VPN services, for hopefully obvious reasons.
Advertisement
I guess this is all from tracking cookies and third-party analytics which are embedded into most websites. It’s good internet hygiene to block these especially if you are visiting less reputable parts of the internet.
I don’t think the government would go so far as to ban VPNs but they may require them to be age gated. However, they need to be prepared for what follows. They may note that even regimes as extreme as China and Russia are not able to effectively block access.
I really hope ultimately the government will realise the proper way to handle this is by making it easy for parents to control what access their children have. All the tools already exist to do this effectively but perhaps the government can force device manufacturers to make it easier.
You really trust the government that much? This country is becoming like China, the only difference at the moment is we have a choice voting someone in, sadly they are no difference in any of them.
This country has already become a police and nanny state. I would not put anything past our government, no matter what side they bat for.
I use a VPN for when I am using Wi-Fi out of my house, I also use it at home as well. Ban VPN and people will still use it, or use the Tor browser.
Will OFCOM mandate that VPN providers, build in a backdoor, slowly ever so slowly the web is being controlled and I fear that it will become irrelevant.
Yup, pathetic isn’t it, rather than doing this they should be educating kids more of the dangers that are out there, any kid with half an IQ can bypass what they’ve already done, all it’s doing is annoying the average person, and companies will rather stop servicing country’s than be bullied to do as they say, look at imgur, I’ve used it for years for all my image hosting, useless to me now, tons of websites with now no images being displayed and endless amounts of tutorials with no pictures in them, started a new game recently and wanted to check up on some guides, and all the images were all hosted on imgur >.<
There should be an option on your broadband accounts to disable all blocks like most do with 18+ rated content, once allowed, you become responsible for what your kids get up to.
Just waiting to see what happens when the OSA gets tested by US websites in the American courts. 1 site is already suing Ofcom & if it goes their way it could turn into an avalanche of litigation.
I don’t think much will happen because 4chan is a very niche website that most people who even know it exists actively dislike. The US Court will say “Ofcom have no jurisidction here” and Ofcom will order UK ISPs to block it and nobody will care. More interesting will be when Ofcom start picking on bigger targets like Wikipedia who have said they will not bring in age checks under any circumstances. It’s astonishing that it’s a real possibility Wikipedia will be censored in the UK, although you would hope the government will step in before it gets to that.
And what would be these obvious reasons why you wouldn’t accept comments with VPN recommendations? Given that they are perfectly legal.
It’s in the article:
“The UK government promptly responded to this by warning that online platforms which “deliberately target UK children and promote [Virtual Private Network] use” could now “face enforcement action, including significant financial penalties“.”
I rather not take the liability risk.
Oh I do hope a Government minister gets caught with their pants down or seriously hacked! But then there would be a cover-up and Sir Humphrey will obfuscate the scandal of course.
They have brought about yet more unintended consequences by trying to control the uncontrollable.
Denmark on Friday indicated it plans to ban access to social media by children. Progressives will inevitably try to introduce similar measures in the UK, with associated ID verification required for access more likely.
if we ban the use of said “VPN’s” then what about businesses then?
if I work from home and my F***iclie*t for example wont connect because it is banned, then thats a huge problem.