» ISP News » 

BT Spectrum Refarming Trial May Boost UK G.fast and FTTC Broadband Speed

Wednesday, May 10th, 2017 (8:50 am) - Score 4,071

A new Proof of Concept trial in Kent (England) is about to begin that could allow Openreach’s (BT) new ultrafast G.fast technology to share the same spectrum as existing FTTC (VDSL2) “fibre broadband” services, which in the future might help to boost speeds beyond 330Mbps.

At present most “superfast broadband” connections on Openreach’s UK telecoms infrastructure are delivered via their VDSL2 based Fibre-to-the-Cabinet (FTTC) technology, which uses up to 17.664MHz of spectrum and can deliver speeds of up to 80Mbps.

By comparison the new G.fast service harnesses spectrum between 19-106MHz in order to deliver speeds of up to 330Mbps (note: there’s a lot more to it than just spectrum but we’re only looking at one aspect). The technology can go much faster (Gigabit speeds at a few tens of metres) but BT have an eye on mass market coverage rather than niche performance at the top end (this would also be difficult to reliably advertise).

Both technologies need to keep some distance from one another (i.e. G.fast can’t use the VDSL2 spectrum and vice versa) in order to avoid interference (see example impact in the chart below from Nokia Networks). Similarly they also use two different forms of half / full duplexing (i.e. the transmission of data in two directions, either asymmetrically or symmetrically): VDSL2 uses Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) and G.fast harnesses Time Division Duplex (TDD).

nokia networks gfast vs vdsl2 fttc broadband

Suffice to say that getting the two to co-exist in overlapping spectrum frequencies is an incredibly difficult proposition, particularly given the key problem of crosstalk interference from G.fast into VDSL2 and to what extent this difficult but predictable non-stationary crosstalk could be mitigated.

G.fast can tackle crosstalk via Vectoring by default, which works a bit like noise cancelling headphones (i.e. it coordinates the copper line signals in order to remove interference). Sadly Vectoring on VDSL2 has been much harder to achieve (here) and today is only implemented in certain very specific / busy areas (i.e. where the problem is most acute), which can help to return FTTC speeds to more normal levels.

Back in January 2017 ISPreview.co.uk revealed that BT’s researchers were in the process of evaluating a “ground breaking” solution that might be able to overcome this challenge (here). The good news is they’ve recently added a new Proof of Concept (PoC) trial to their roadmap for Spectrum Refarming, which will begin on 11th May 2017 in All Hallows (Kent) where most of the local FTTC cabinets have been upgraded with subsidies (Broadband Delivery UK). An earlier test also took place at the Cambridge Science Park.

An Openreach spokesperson informed ISPreview.co.uk that the new PoC trial “is an opportunity to explore a potential way of improving G.fast capability in terms of extending coverage and speed whilst protecting and in some circumstances improving VDSL2 performance.”

The latter remark about “improving” VDSL2 performance is interesting because normally achieving true co-existence would be very difficult without some trade-off in VDSL2 performance. However Openreach said that their PoC would test the hypothesis that applying Vectoring with Refarming in tandem could more than protect existing VDSL2 speeds, whilst improving G.fast.

We have previously been told that mitigating the predictable non-stationary crosstalk probably cannot be achieved without some trade-off in VDSL2 performance, although this assumed that Openreach would stick with a purely static approach to spectrum management. The operator was also known to have been considering both a semi-static or dynamic option (dynamic would be very complex to implement).

At present there is a guard band between the VDSL and G.fast spectra (gap exists between 17.6-19MHz) to ensure spectrum compatibility and interestingly Openreach noted that this would be preserved by their refarming approach. “So there should be no material difference between what we are rolling out today, other than the change of frequencies,” said the spokesperson.

Openreach added that G.fast vectoring and VDSL vectoring are independent – if there were frequency overlap then one would act as an alien into the other. Also the fact that G.fast uses the same spectrum for both [upstream] and [downstream] would result in near-end crosstalk (NEXT) arising between the systems.

PoC trials are usually quite short and so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that this one will only run for two weeks. The trial is also expected to involve two street cabinets and around 300 lines. It’s still very early days for this technology and it may not amount to anything, although equally it could in the future help to improve G.fast speeds and coverage (Openreach has a long-term goal of reaching 500Mbps by 2025). Meanwhile a question mark will remain over its impact on VDSL2 but the trial may provide some verifiable answers.

We did also query the choice of cabinets, given that those selected have been deployed as part of the state aid supported Broadband Delivery UK programme. Apparently Openreach chose those cabinets because they happened to meet various criteria from a limited choice of cabs with VDSL2 and G.fast.

The results of this trial are expected to be published in June 2017 (CFPCG). The PoC also forms part of related work being handled by BT’s Head of Access Platform Innovation, Kevin Foster, who is Chairman of NICC’s DSL Task Group.

Leave a Comment
13 Responses
  1. Avatar Chris P says:

    Encouraging news. I look forward to reading more on this.

  2. Avatar CarlT says:

    I would imagine they are using changing VDSL (back) to profile 8a, 8.832 MHz rather than 17.664 MHz, vectoring it to improve performance in that range, and moving the extra 8.832 MHz to G.fast.

    In theory anyone who was previously on an 80Mb service and getting performance that requires VDSL profile 17a could be moved over to the G.fast network.

    1. Avatar MikeW says:

      Interesting idea.

      IIRC, However, BT’s original profile (up to 2011) was 8c, with bandplan 997-M1c-A-7, only up to 7.05MHz, and with maximum power of 11.5dBm. It handled 40/10 in its day, but I’m not sure it would carry the 55/10 package now.

      In any case, they’d have to stick with a 998 bandplan now, and presumably have to pick a profile with a power of 14.5dBm to match 17a. Profile 8d allows for this, and can use the 8.832MHz top-end.

      With LR-VDSL using profile 8b, and 20.5dBm power, it would make sense to reuse that profile for those cabs.

      In 8MHz, bandplan 998 favours more downstream than 997, so is more likely to be able to carry the downstream of both 40 and 55Mbps packages. However, I wonder whether it will disfavour upstream too much. If so, they could attempt to use profile 12a to redress that balance too.

  3. Avatar David says:

    Whilst I applaud BT if it gives existing users more performance, I’m also dismayed as it’s another excuse to sweat the copper further. I’d be more interested in seeing them really pushing FTTPoD and leaving G.Fast as the fall back.

  4. Avatar h42422 says:

    If they can get gigabit speeds from their copper network with minimal investment compared to a full network rebuild, what is wrong with that? Even if they started the rebuild today, it would take a lifetime to complete.

    I personally don’t care what is the material used to deliver my internet connection. I just wish it would be faster than the current 2Mbps due to a long exchange only line, which will not be helped by this technology or any other for that matter.

    If they started a massive network rebuild, they would start it from where it is the easiest to do. Those with fast FTTC connections would get their FTTP first, and those of us whose speeds are essentially the same as they were in 1999, would be pushed to the bottom of the queue again, as we are the most expensive to upgrade, no matter what technology will be used.

    Yes, the future may be fibre, but if there is a way to provide fibre speeds with copper technology while waiting for FTTP, by all means let them.

    1. Mark Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      They won’t do Gigabit speeds via G.fast (yet) as their aim for 2025 was to push the headline rate from 330Mbps to 500Mbps. The above development might help that cause a little but it’s only one part of the changes they’ll need to make over the next few years.

    2. Avatar Matt says:

      I expect virgin will be the one to force them to look at above 500Mbps as by 2020 alone I expect Virgin will offer 500Mbps to all there network if not 1Gbps though later might be harder but not compared to how much BT would need do.

    3. Avatar CarlT says:

      Virgin can happily hit a gigabit in most of their areas this year or next, however Openreach have never been interested in speed competitions with VM and there’s no reason to think this’ll change.

    4. Avatar TheFacts says:

      Like we all need 1G…

    5. Avatar CarlT says:

      Indeed. Basically no-one would buy it. Much of the population resent paying any more than TalkTalk prices for broadband let alone the kind of price tag a gigabit service comes in at.

      Most don’t really do that much that would benefit from that extra performance either just yet. It’s slowly changing.

  5. Avatar Bob Hannent says:

    It would be interesting to see if they can deliver VDSL2 and G.Fast with different service providers, it would make having diverse links and a fast backup much easier on a single line.

    1. Avatar 125uS says:

      How can you have diverse links on a single line? The most susceptible component in an Internet service is the last mile.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Onestream £19.99 (*27.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £21.00 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £21.50
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £21.99 (*36.52)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
  • NOW TV £22.00 (*40.00)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2890)
  2. BT (2821)
  3. FTTC (1809)
  4. Building Digital UK (1770)
  5. Politics (1707)
  6. Openreach (1661)
  7. Business (1486)
  8. FTTH (1343)
  9. Mobile Broadband (1275)
  10. Statistics (1271)
  11. 4G (1099)
  12. Fibre Optic (1082)
  13. Wireless Internet (1044)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1041)
  15. Virgin Media (1034)
  16. EE (729)
  17. Vodafone (704)
  18. TalkTalk (689)
  19. Sky Broadband (685)
  20. 5G (563)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact