» ISP News, Key Developments » 

BT Dark Fibre Ruling Forces Ofcom to Revoke Business Connectivity Changes

Thursday, November 23rd, 2017 (8:39 am) - Score 3,673

The UK telecoms regulator has today announced that they are revoking and re-examining the changes imposed under their 2016 Business Connectivity Market Review (e.g. Dark Fibre Access), which follows a BT supported ruling from the Competition Appeal Tribunal against their market definitions.

As a quick recap, Openreach were due to launch an Ofcom proposed Dark Fibre Access (DFA) product in October 2017, which would have enabled rival ISPs to gain “physical access” to the operator’s existing fibre optic cables (i.e. enabling them to install their own equipment at either end of the fibre within cable ducts).

The regulator claimed that DFA could foster more competition and speed-up the roll-out of faster broadband services around the UK (e.g. backhaul capacity for new networks), while big infrastructure builders like BT, Virgin Media, Cityfibre and Zayo all feared that it could discourage investment in the building of new fibre optic networks.

In the end BT challenged Ofcom’s business connectivity review and won because the CAT found that Ofcom had used “incorrect” market definitions (here), which didn’t just put a stop to the regulator’s Dark Fibre solution but also impacted many other aspects. As a result Ofcom has today revoked the following parts of their 2016 review.

Ofcom’s Revoked Business Connectivity Review

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has found Ofcom to have erred in relation to various aspects of the decisions concerning market definition under appeal and required Ofcom to look again at some specific matters concerning market definition. In the meantime it has required Ofcom to revoke the market identifications, market power determinations, SMP [Significant Market Power] services conditions and directions (where applicable) in relation to:

a) The wholesale market for contemporary interface symmetric broadband origination in the Rest of the United Kingdom excluding the Hull Area;

b) Wholesale market for contemporary interface symmetric broadband origination in the Central London Area; and

c) The wholesale market for contemporary interface symmetric broadband origination in the London Periphery.

The regulator has now said that they are “reconsidering” the matters that were raised by the CAT and “will address these matters as soon as practicable.” In keeping with that Ofcom has today launched a fresh consultation on their original Dark Fibre proposals (here), which is effectively a re-run of what we saw a couple of years ago.

This “exercise” is also expected to “overlap” with the next business connectivity review (they tend to conduct these every 3 years), which Ofcom has already started work on.

Ofcom’s Statement

In the meantime, we are imposing temporary regulatory measures. These will apply in a revised set of markets where, under a conservative approach which takes into account the Tribunal’s judgement, it remains clear that BT has significant market power (SMP). These measures will safeguard competition and protect the interests of consumers in the revised markets.

The temporary conditions include the following changes from the position in 2016:

* There is no longer regulation of services above 1Gbit/s (‘Very High Bandwidth’).
* We have also removed all regulation from the central business districts of Birmingham, Glasgow and Leeds.

The temporary regulations apply to services at and below 1Gbit/s and include: access requirements, charge controls, and minimum quality standards for these ‘Lower Bandwidth’ Ethernet leased lines. These conditions are broadly in line with those set in the 2016 BCMR.

Ofcom is also today consulting on proposals to introduce a revised dark fibre remedy to address BT’s SMP for services at and below 1Gbit/s. We believe dark fibre can provide significant benefits for businesses and consumers – supporting better broadband and mobile services, including 5G. This includes a consultation on the market definition and SMP findings adopted in the temporary conditions statement.

We had been expecting Ofcom to give DFA a second try and so today’s development doesn’t come as much of a surprise. In the meantime Openreach has proposed to launch a new OSA Filter Connect product, which is a kind of virtual (grey) dark fibre style solution (here) but it probably won’t suit every ISP.

The new dark fibre consultation will close on 29th December 2017 and Ofcom expects to issue a statement in early 2018. At this stage it’s unclear whether they’ll be able to fast-track it back into life next year or will need to wait until the completion of their next full review.

UPDATE 1:35pm

Cityfibre is naturally unhappy that Ofcom are taking a second bash at Dark Fibre.

Mark Collins, Director Strategy & Policy at CityFibre, said:

“CityFibre acknowledges and welcomes the Competition Appeals Tribunal’s order which quashes Ofcom’s BCMR in its entirety.

It is now imperative that Ofcom reconsiders and redefines its assessment of the market to reflect the accelerated rollout of full-fibre demanded by the government and being delivered by the likes of CityFibre. Ofcom needs to take to heart the strong criticisms made by the CAT.

However, whilst the quashing of the BCMR is welcome, Ofcom’s response today appears to double down on its misguided approach to assessing the scope for competition whilst maintaining its flawed fixation with regulated dark fibre access. It’s pessimism about the prospects for real, infrastructure-based competition perversely restricts alternative providers’ ability to compete.

We will study the proposals carefully, but regret that Ofcom does not yet seem to have taken the opportunity for a fundamental and much needed rethink. As a company that is making substantial investments in the UK’s full fibre infrastructure, what we value above all else is predictable and rational regulation, rather than a ‘make do and mend’ strategy that simply puts sticking plasters over past errors. In a rules-based system, the referee as well as the players must abide by the rules of the game.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
6 Responses
  1. James Blessing says:

    If anyone want to have some light entertainment you might want to seek out how Ofcom plan to limit the new DFA product to sub-1Gbps (in order to get round some of the objections to their initial BCMR assumptions)

    1. CarlT says:

      Far more fun ways to self-flagellate than reading that stuff.

    2. CarlT says:

      It’s on page 13 of the document, Mark. 3.21 is the really crazy part.

      3.18 The proposed dark fibre obligation would be limited to the Lower Bandwidth CISBO
      markets in which we have proposed that BT has SMP. Consequently, BT would not be
      required to supply dark fibre circuits for purposes that fall outside the scope of those
      markets. BT would therefore have the commercial freedom to restrict usage of its dark
      fibre product to prevent it being used for core conveyance and for bandwidths above

      3.19 We consider that BT would be able to implement an effective contractual restriction to this effect if it so chooses and that such restrictions would not be unduly burdensome for BT to administer or monitor.

      3.20 Dark fibre purchasers would have compelling incentives to comply with such a contractual restriction. Using dark fibre for bandwidths above 1Gbit/s would constitute a breach of contract. This could lead to sanctions, including termination of the service, which would be highly damaging for the provider and their relationship with their customer. In addition, major users of dark fibre would not want to be perceived as untrustworthy business partners who were prepared to breach contractual obligations.

      3.21 We consider that purchasers of dark fibre are unlikely to be able to use it for bandwidths above 1Gbit/s without this coming to BT’s attention. For example, BT would require access to the circuit ends for maintenance purposes. In many cases it would be apparent whether the active equipment connected to the circuit was capable of supporting bandwidths above 1Gbit/s. BT would then be able to invoke its contractual rights to check the provider’s records, or inspect the service management interface to verify actual bandwidth on the circuit. In addition, if a customer that was previously purchasing a 10Gbit/s active circuit switched to dark fibre, then BT would have a reasonable suspicion that it was being used for bandwidths above 1Gbit/s.

    3. wireless pacman says:

      You really do wonder sometimes what goes on between the ears of Ofcom staff. What in earth is the point of a dark fibre product, with price based on EAD1000, that has its usage capped at 1 Gbps??

      Can imagine that the ONLY reason Openwretch are against it is that they know full well how hard it will be to police the 1 Gbps speed cap.

  2. Nat Morris says:

    I don’t think BTs checking on existing ethernet fibre on the ground is very good, I know of numerous ISP staff/owners who have ordered LES1 / LES3 / LES10 circuits in the past (5 to 10 years ago) and now run them with their own 1G / 10G SFPs on their end of.

    Original LES circuits under 100mb were delivered with no active ISDN remote monitoring for BT.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Ultrafast ISPs
  • Gigaclear £17.00
    Speed: 200Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Community Fibre £20.00
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £24.00
    Speed: 108Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £25.00
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £25.00
    Speed: 158Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £17.99
    Speed 33Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Shell Energy £19.99
    Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • NOW £20.00
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £20.00
    Speed 54Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (4106)
  2. BT (3148)
  3. Politics (2113)
  4. Building Digital UK (2023)
  5. Openreach (1967)
  6. FTTC (1921)
  7. Business (1830)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1603)
  9. Statistics (1509)
  10. 4G (1376)
  11. FTTH (1371)
  12. Virgin Media (1276)
  13. Ofcom Regulation (1240)
  14. Wireless Internet (1233)
  15. Fibre Optic (1232)
  16. Vodafone (926)
  17. EE (904)
  18. 5G (896)
  19. TalkTalk (821)
  20. Sky Broadband (787)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact