Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Citizens Advice Blasts Poor Reliability of UK Mobile and Broadband ISPs

Thursday, Jan 25th, 2018 (10:00 pm) - Score 815

The Citizens Advice agency has claimed that 6 out of 10 broadband users have suffered from slow speeds or had their connection stop working in the last year. As a result they are calling on the government to “strengthen the voices of telecoms consumers” by establishing a consumer advocate.

According to Citizens Advice and their ComRes commissioned interview of 4,127 British adults (conducted between 12th and 16th of January 2018), problems with broadband speed and reliability have already disrupted the ability of some consumers to work or study (24%), pay bills or bank online (16%), or connect with friends and family (21%).

On top of that over a third of respondents to the study said they felt as if the government does not take into account the interests of ordinary service users when it comes to mobile and broadband issues.

Summary of Key Survey Findings

* 33% of 25-34 year olds said a broadband service issue had a fair or great amount of impact on their ability to work or study.

* Broadband customers spent on average 2.4 hours trying to resolve an issue of poor or no service.

* A quarter of those surveyed felt they could not trust their broadband provider to resolve their problem quickly.

* 26% of those who switched broadband provider experienced delays.

In response the consumer group has called on the government to establish a telecoms consumer advocate as part of their upcoming Consumer Green Paper, which is due to be published very soon. Citizens Advice claim this would “ensure telecoms consumers have the same representation as other essential markets like energy and water.

However the above proposal sounds an awful lot like Ofcom’s existing Communications Consumer Panel (CCP), which arguably hasn’t been as effective as some might have hoped. Most people don’t even know it exists and the panel hasn’t really been vocal enough around some of the most common consumer issues.

Gillian Guy, CEO of Citizens Advice, said:

“People now rely on their broadband and mobile connection for the day to day running of their lives.

Yet the majority of people continue to face significant disruptions that can waste their time and stop them from being able to pay their bills, bank online, study, work or connect with family and friends.

The government’s Consumer Green Paper is an opportunity to strengthen the voices of telecoms consumers by establishing a consumer advocate in broadband and mobile markets to reflect how essential these services are to people.”

The agency is certainly right to say that “consumers face more problems in the mobile and broadband markets than other essential markets like energy and water,” although in fairness this isn’t exactly an apples to apples style comparison. Digital data networks reflect a radically more complex, variable and dynamic market than linear utility services like gas, electricity or water.

Broadband connectivity in particular comes via many different technology and cable types, which can be affected by a huge variety of different issues that may occur both inside your home (e.g. slow wifi, faulty routers etc.) or within the operator’s network (e.g. network congestion, copper line interference etc.). Suffice to say that no consumer advocate is going to be able to truly fix issues that are so often inherent to such technologies.

At the same time it’s worth noting that a lot of big changes are already on the way. For example, the ASA and Ofcom are both working to improve how broadband services are advertised (here and here) and a new Automatic Compensation system is due to be introduced from 2019 that may help to improve service quality (here). Lest we forget the new quality standards being imposed upon Openreach (BT) by the regulator and other changes.

On top of that the on-going rollout of so-called “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) networks and future “ultrafast broadband” (100Mbps+) platforms should spread some natural improvements, particularly where “full fibre” (FTTP/H) infrastructure is deployed. However the latter will take many years to reach a significant level of UK coverage.

Meanwhile the Government’s new ‘Consumer Green Paper’ is aiming to make a few changes of its own, such the simplification of Terms & Conditions (T&Cs), measures to protect people against “unexpected payments” arising from subscription services (e.g. reoccurring home delivery of products that you didn’t know existed) and more powers to impose civil law fines against companies that breach consumer laws.

UPDATE 26th Jan 2018 – 2:50pm

UK ISP Gigaclear has jumped in with a comment.

Matthew Hare, Chief Executive of Gigaclear, said:

“This report again reinforces that UK consumers, particularly those in rural areas, are often struggling with slow and unreliable broadband. Quality broadband connectivity is no longer a ‘nice to have’ commodity, it is a necessary utility alongside electricity and water. It’s imperative that the government not only realises this now, but puts the right policies and budgets in place to combat this issue head on.

The suggestion of a Government appointed advocate is a positive move in ensuring this issue is elevated, particularly following the recent ASA ruling which denies the need to provide clarification around advertised fibre broadband services. Consumers need clarity and support about the services available to them and the choices they have.

In addition, the industry needs to further invest into an ultrafast full fibre broadband infrastructure. Until there is a national plan to make full fibre broadband available to everyone in the UK, many consumers are going to be saddled with second-rate connections. We need to act now to ensure that everybody in the UK has access to the connectivity that secures our digital future.”

Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
5 Responses
  1. Avatar photo dragoneast says:

    Perhaps the flat earth society had a point after all?

  2. Avatar photo TheFacts says:

    And the involvement of Intel, Google, Microsoft, PC World etc. in this?

  3. Avatar photo Web Dude says:

    Maybe Citizens Advice and the Consumers Association could lobby MPs to provide funding for fibre at a fifth of the cost of the HS2 “vanity” project which will benefit a minority.

    With fast fibre connections to everyone, business meetings could more easily be held online, and have less time wasted in driving / flying / trains. No (or few) traffic jams on the internet, much less pollution and less time taken out of the day. Someone from Liverpool / Manchester / Leeds might take 2+ hours each way on travel for a 3 hour meeting in London…

    A return 1st Class ticket can cost as much as 500 quid for the rail trip, then there would be a taxi or other cost to get from the station… possibly a meal on top or even an overnight stay, whereas from a home in Cheshire / Lancs / Yorks a meeting could start at 0900 and break for lunch, then continue, if necessary, into the early evening.

    1. Avatar photo TheFacts says:

      @WD – in the real world for many years people have been spending their lives on voice conferences and/or collaborating on PCs, neither needing high bandwidth.

      Video conferencing started 30? years ago with 128k ISDN lines. Yes, 128k.

      Isn’t HS2 really about freight capacity?

    2. Avatar photo Web Dude says:

      Re HS2 and Freight – hardly. The HS2 project covers a limited number of cities so those who want any of the intervening stations will still be on the same older routes, and many people (roughly 2 in 3 – approx 950m local vs approx 375m region to region) travel on the slower, within region, trains. Taking the ORR (Office of Rail and Road) 2014/15 figures I calculated 3.6 million rail journeys per day while the HS2 paper on the Gov.UK site says they expect 0.25 million a day to travel on HS2. (I believe the 3.6 million may be on the low side for weekdays – I took the total and divided by 365)

      A friend is a transport consultant (specialism is rail) and his suggestion would be to add extra tracks for freight to be overtaken easily. The major limiting factors are the need for some long tunnels, creating bottlenecks if extra track (for overtaking) is not present.

      The HS2 project is a massive spend for limited return. Worst thing is they mention linking it to Heathrow, too…

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5513)
  2. BT (3514)
  3. Politics (2535)
  4. Openreach (2297)
  5. Business (2261)
  6. Building Digital UK (2243)
  7. FTTC (2043)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1972)
  9. Statistics (1788)
  10. 4G (1663)
  11. Virgin Media (1619)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1460)
  13. Fibre Optic (1394)
  14. Wireless Internet (1389)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon