The Government’s £1.6bn+ Broadband Delivery UK project has published its latest take-up data to the end of 2017 (Q4) for the state aid supported roll-out of “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) services across the United Kingdom, which sees adoption continue to rise with many areas above 50%.
The figures inside this article reflect the percentage of customers (homes and businesses) that have chosen to sign-up with a superfast broadband network (delivered via FTTC, FTTP or Fixed Wireless), albeit only those in areas which have been upgraded through the publicly funded BDUK programme (i.e. % subscribed of premises passed).
At present this data reflects the first two phases of the programme and not any of the most recent follow-on contracts (there’s no data for those yet).
BDUK Phases 1 (Completed Spring 2016)
Supported by £530m of public money via the Government (mostly extracted from a small slice of the BBC TV Licence fee), as well as significant match funding from local authorities and the EU. The public funding is then roughly matched by BT’s private investment. Overall it helped to extend “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) services to cover 90% of homes and businesses in the United Kingdom.
BDUK Phase 2 (Technically on-going)
Supported by £250m of public money via the Government, as well as match funding from local authorities, Local Growth Deals and private investment from suppliers (e.g. BT, Gigaclear, Airband, Call Flow etc.). This phase extended superfast broadband services to 95% of premises in time for the end of 2017, although some contracts are on-going until late 2018 and will reach beyond 95%.
Phase One was broadly dominated by Openreach (BT) linked contracts, while the on-going Phase Two contracts have attracted a mix of extension deals with BT and several alternative network providers, as well as some limited use of Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) technology.
Crucially the BDUK contracts include a clawback (gainshare) clause, which requires the suppliers (e.g. BT) to return part of the public investment as customer adoption of the new service passes beyond the 20% mark in related areas. The funding can then be reinvested to further improve coverage and speeds via future contracts. Efficiency savings from earlier phases can also be reinvested.
So far it looks as if a total of £737 million will be returned via both clawback (£527m) and efficiency savings (£210m), which may increase again during 2018 (details here and here). BDUK has estimated that the reinvestment could be enough to boost the UK coverage of fixed line superfast broadband from 95% today to 98% by the end of 2020. We could label this as BDUK Phase 3 but it doesn’t have a clear designation.
The following table breaks the take-up data down by each BDUK local authority (project area), although for the proper context these percentages should ideally be considered alongside the most recent premises passed (network coverage) data, which can be seen at the bottom of this article. Overall 44.4% of premises have adopted the new service.
NOTE: Some of the counties have divided their deployments into separate contracts. For example, Phase One in Shropshire doesn’t include the ‘Telford and Wrekin‘ area because that is part of a separate Phase Two contract inside the same county. On top of that the contracts were all signed at different times and so are at different stages of development.
Project Area (BDUK Phase 1) | Uptake % (Jun 2017) | Uptake % (Sep 2017) | Update % (Dec 2017) |
Berkshire Councils | 47.9 | 50.1 | 51.9 |
Buckinghamshire and Hertfordshire | 48.4 | 50.8 | 53.3 |
Cambridgeshire, Peterborough | 45.5 | 47.9 | 49.4 |
Central Beds, Bedford Borough, Milton Keynes | 47.1 | 50.3 | 52.1 |
Cheshire East, Cheshire West & Chester, Warrington, Halton | 45.5 | 48 | 50.1 |
Devon & Somerset (including, Plymouth, Torbay, North Somerset, Bath & NE Somerset) | 38.3 | 41.2 | 43.7 |
Coventry, Solihull, Warwickshire | 46.2 | 48.9 | 50.9 |
Cumbria | 40.3 | 43.3 | 45.2 |
Derbyshire | 37.3 | 40.1 | 42.5 |
Dorset, Bournemouth and Poole | 38.4 | 41.6 | 43.7 |
Durham, Gateshead, Tees Valley and Sunderland | 37.3 | 40.2 | 42.3 |
East Riding of Yorkshire | 41.9 | 45.4 | 46.4 |
East Sussex, Brighton and Hove | 44.2 | 47.4 | 49.7 |
Essex, Southend-On-Sea, Thurrock | 44 | 46.9 | 48.8 |
Greater Manchester | 32.5 | 34.3 | 36.5 |
Hampshire | 42.7 | 45 | 47.2 |
Herefordshire and Gloucestershire | 39 | 42.1 | 44.2 |
Isle of Wight | 36.2 | 38.8 | 41.2 |
Kent and Medway | 42.9 | 45.9 | 48 |
Lancashire, Blackpool, Blackburn with Darwen | 37 | 39.4 | 41.3 |
Leicestershire | 43.9 | 46.6 | 48.6 |
Lincolnshire | 43.1 | 45.9 | 47.4 |
Merseyside | 31 | 34 | 36.2 |
Newcastle upon Tyne | 32.9 | 36.4 | 39.4 |
Norfolk | 42.2 | 45 | 47 |
North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire | 41.8 | 44.1 | 45.9 |
North Yorkshire | 45 | 49.1 | 49.4 |
Northamptonshire | 47.6 | 50.1 | 52 |
Northumberland | 44.1 | 46.9 | 48.1 |
Nottinghamshire | 43.2 | 45.8 | 48.4 |
Oxfordshire | 46.9 | 49.6 | 51.8 |
Rutland | 55.6 | 58.2 | 58 |
Shropshire | 39.6 | 42.5 | 44.8 |
Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent | 39.7 | 42.2 | 44.4 |
Suffolk | 44.4 | 46.7 | 48.8 |
Surrey | 49.4 | 51.1 | 53.2 |
West Sussex | 46.1 | 48.9 | 50.6 |
West Yorkshire | 36.8 | 39.4 | 41.6 |
Wiltshire | 45.4 | 48 | 50.2 |
South Gloucestershire | 48 | 50.9 | 53.9 |
Worcestershire | 43.9 | 46.6 | 48.6 |
Devolved Administrations | |||
Highlands and Islands | 36.8 | 39.5 | 42.1 |
Northern Ireland | 40.9 | 43.4 | 51.1 |
Rest of Scotland | 33.1 | 35.4 | 37 |
Wales | 37.3 | 39 | 40.2 |
So far in Phase 2 an overall total of 27% of premises have adopted the new service. Some areas also have several contracts under the Phase 2 programme and we’ve separated their % figures with a comma below. One highlight below is the inclusion of Swindon, which is showing very low take-up (3.6%) and this largely reflects the areas troubled UKBN fixed wireless network (here); it’s also a younger contract than others.
Project Area (BDUK Phase 2) | Uptake % (Jun 2017) | Uptake % (Sep 2017) | Uptake % (Dec 2017) |
Berkshire | no data | no data | 8.2 , 2.5 |
Bedford & Milton Keynes | 14.9 | 20.9 | 23.9 |
Black Country | 14.8 | 17.8 | 21.8 |
Bucks & Herts | 20.3 | 20.9 | 17.2 |
Cambridgeshire | no data | no data | no data |
Cheshire | 28.9 | 34.8 | 36.2 |
Cornwall | 22.1 | 21.9 | 21.9 |
Cumbria | 18.3 | 18 | 20 |
Derbyshire | 20 | 23.6 | 24.4 |
Devon & Somerset | no data | 5.7 | 6.6 |
Dorset | 14.1 | 13.8 | 21 |
Durham | 17.2 | 21.4 | 22.1 |
East Riding (Yorkshire) | 26 | 27.2 | 33.5 |
East Sussex | 26.4 | 31.9 | 39.6 |
Essex | 24.4 | 28.2 | 30.3 , 15.4 |
Greater Manchester | no data | no data | no data |
Hampshire | 23.3 | 19.3 | 24.1 |
Herefordshire & Gloucestershire | no data | no data | 25.2 |
Kent | 23.7 | 23.9 | 30.7 |
Lancashire | 23.4 | 21.2 | 24.8 |
Leicestershire | 23.7 | 24.1 | 24.4 |
Lincolnshire | 21.2 | 24.1 | 26 |
Norfolk | 32 | 33.7 | 35.2 |
North Lincolnshire | 21.1 | 25.5 | 28.3 |
North Yorkshire | 35.4 | 49 | 47.4 |
Northamptonshire | 21 | 26.1 | 30.7 |
Northumberland | 29.0 | 32.8 | 37.6 |
Nottinghamshire | 28.2 | 30.1 | 31.9 |
Oxfordshire | no data | no data | no data |
Rutland | no data | no data | no data |
Shropshire | no data | 9.7 | 13.7 |
South Gloucestershire | 16.8 | 19.4 | 23.9 |
South Yorkshire | 21.0 | 24.5 | 23.6 |
Staffordshire | 20.7 | 20.7 | 30.6 |
Suffolk | 31.7 | 32.3 | 35.3 |
Swindon | no data | no data | 3.6 |
Telford & Wrekin | 23 | 30.2 | 32.6 |
Warwickshire | 34.9 | 37.8 | 37 |
West Oxfordshire | no data | no data | no data |
West Sussex | 23.9 | 26.8 | 32.7 |
West Yorkshire | 16.5 | 20.7 | 24.4 |
Wiltshire | 22.3 | 25.4 | 29 |
Worcestershire | 27.5 | 33.1 | 36.1 |
Devolved Administrations | |||
Highlands and Islands | no data | no data | no data |
Northern Ireland | 17.6 | 20.3 | 20.8 |
Rest of Scotland | no data | no data | no data |
Wales | no data | no data | no data |
IMPORTANT: Take-up is a dynamically scaled measurement, which means that at certain stages of the scheme it may go up or even down depending upon the pace of deployment (i.e. premises passed in any given time-scale), although over time the take-up should only rise.
Explained another way, earlier phases of the roll-out were easier and faster to deploy, so you could expect to see a bit of a yo-yo movement with the take-up % sometimes falling if lots of new areas were suddenly covered. Some contracts are also younger than others and will thus take time to catch-up. However BDUK’s roll-out pace is slowing as it reaches tricky rural areas (Phase 2), which will give take-up a chance to climb.
A number of other factors can also impact take-up, such as the higher prices for related “fibre” services, as well as customers being locked into long contracts with their existing ISP (they can’t upgrade immediately) and a lack of general awareness (locals don’t always know that the faster service exists) or interest in the new connectivity (if you have a decent ADSL2+ speed and only basic needs then you might feel less inclined to upgrade).
The fear of switching to a different ISP may also obstruct some services. In other cases the new service may run out of capacity (i.e. demand is higher than expected), which means that people who want to upgrade are prevented from doing so until Openreach resolves the problem, although the scale of this issue is fairly small.
Now, for some context, here’s the latest progress report on related contracts for the same period.
Total BDUK Funding | Total Local Body Funding (Councils etc.) | Total Contracted premises | Delivered to Date (Dec 2017) | |
Bedford & Milton Keynes | £6,380,000 | £7,830,000 | 52,822 | 44,555 |
Berkshire | £5,153,017 | £4,603,250 | 43,723 | 29,754 |
Black Country | £3,780,000 | £3,780,000 | 40,011 | 35,482 |
Bucks & Herts | £10,837,000 | £11,415,000 | 94,428 | 71,305 |
Cambridgeshire | £8,250,000 | £17,750,000 | 105,850 | 99,905 |
Cheshire | £6,461,000 | £16,091,055 | 82,468 | 76,048 |
Cornwall | £5,960,000 | £12,529,786 | 15,288 | 7,317 |
Cumbria | £19,959,519 | £18,798,000 | 120,065 | 115,410 |
Derbyshire | £9,579,550 | £9,580,000 | 103,755 | 90,326 |
Devon & Somerset | £57,510,245 | £39,187,538 | 344,835 | 284,144 |
Dorset | £13,741,841 | £12,349,470 | 79,874 | 74,275 |
Durham | £12,786,267 | £11,763,000 | 112,898 | 105,607 |
East Riding (Yorkshire) | £10,507,459 | £5,193,079 | 49,510 | 47,703 |
East Sussex | £13,640,000 | £17,000,000 | 70,040 | 60,416 |
Essex | £13,299,000 | £13,299,000 | 150,423 | 98,320 |
Greater Manchester | £3,440,000 | £5,923,000 | 41,363 | 39,651 |
Hampshire | £15,262,307 | £14,180,000 | 106,434 | 78,042 |
Herefordshire & Gloucestershire | £31,090,658 | £27,246,760 | 152,367 | 116,918 |
Highlands & Islands | £50,830,000 | £75,600,000 | 149,730 | 138,596 |
Isle of Wight | £2,490,000 | £2,490,000 | 17,617 | 17,649 |
Kent | £17,063,509 | £14,998,391 | 137,881 | 133,555 |
Lancashire | £14,670,000 | £22,540,000 | 147,334 | 141,592 |
Leicestershire | £7,968,895 | £10,884,647 | 74,479 | 66,396 |
Lincolnshire | £16,110,000 | £17,910,000 | 137,949 | 125,203 |
Merseyside | £5,460,000 | £4,374,000 | 43,905 | 42,745 |
Newcastle | £970,000 | £945,131 | 6,760 | 6,697 |
Norfolk | £24,650,000 | £24,210,000 | 202,367 | 179,519 |
North Lincolnshire | £4,181,242 | £1,880,963 | 29,442 | 28,131 |
North Yorkshire | £28,160,000 | £14,654,726 | 175,283 | 165,581 |
Northamptonshire | £9,856,669 | £11,009,000 | 79,349 | 70,208 |
Northern Ireland | £11,454,000 | £21,954,000 | 66,907 | 60,181 |
Northumberland | £10,687,867 | £11,986,750 | 49,620 | 45,910 |
Nottinghamshire | £7,130,000 | £8,688,644 | 66,807 | 62,489 |
Oxfordshire | £8,184,500 | £13,924,500 | 78,007 | 73,292 |
Rest of Scotland | £50,000,000 | £107,575,000 | 572,563 | 548,454 |
Rutland | £1,000,000 | £1,670,000 | 10,004 | 9,345 |
Shropshire | £19,317,466 | £12,722,000 | 69,711 | 53,506 |
South Gloucestershire | £3,370,000 | £3,521,123 | 21,616 | 17,014 |
South Yorkshire | £9,845,000 | £10,155,000 | 95,664 | 76,325 |
Staffordshire | £9,620,000 | £7,440,000 | 80,937 | 73,925 |
Suffolk | £26,940,000 | £26,677,050 | 123,434 | 105,695 |
Surrey | £1,310,000 | £19,020,081 | 76,958 | 71,216 |
Swindon | £950,000 | £950,000 | 20,138 | 16,381 |
Telford & Wrekin | £2,157,000 | £1,843,000 | 8,822 | 7,459 |
Wales | £66,967,000 | £156,407,000 | 728,737 | 679,736 |
Warwickshire | £15,007,144 | £15,007,144 | 74,301 | 50,223 |
West Oxfordshire | £1,600,000 | £1,556,675 | 4,788 | 0 |
West Sussex | £8,011,243 | £7,510,000 | 54,443 | 49,337 |
West Yorkshire | £11,019,827 | £11,175,487 | 99,913 | 81,633 |
Wiltshire | £9,270,000 | £16,496,000 | 83,543 | 70,849 |
Worcestershire | £8,387,032 | £11,390,000 | 66,561 | 55,074 |
£712,276,257 | £917,685,250 | 5,421,724 | 4,799,094 |
The above figures only include 24Mbps+ capable premises in BDUK intervention areas.
Phase 2 in Devon and Somerset, clearly gone very wrong in the areas that are complete (Dartmoor & Exmoor), but nobody from CDS (Connecting Devon & Somerset) or BDUK seems to understand this or care in the slightest about the gross waste of public money.
Weirdly, the contracted phase 1 +2 has gone up by 6k for CDS- interesting to see of this is new rural work or a change in BT’s commercial rollout? But the >24Mbps has reduced by 771 in the three months.
My main gripe is that for a public spend of £4.6m, 6.6% is only 383 connected premises, that’s £12k per connection! https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2017/06/airband-wins-superfast-broadband-deal-13000-premises-devon-uk.html
It’s pointless to be criticising take-up levels during the early life stage of a new deployment. All of the BDUK projects started out their first few quarters with low take-up and now look where the Phase 1’s have gone. So far Phase 2 is following a similar trend, so in 3 years the take-up is likely to be several times higher and perhaps similar to Phase 1 today.
What the low Phase 2 take up rate in Devon & Somerset does demonstrate is the slow pace of the CDS programme which due to two failed procurement attempts wasted two years before awarding 5/6ths of the contract area to Gigaclear in December 2017. However, it took CDS until December 2017 before they signed off on Gigaclear’s roll out shedule and allowed them to start work. The good news is that the Gigaclear website shows that in their five lots the CDS Phase 2 programme will connect 47,800 properties by 2020 but in addition to that Gigaclear will invest commerciall to connect another 43,300 properties making 91,100 properties served with ultrafast broadband in total. To quote the Gigaclear video, “Giagaclear are coming for Devon & Somerset”. See https://www.connectingdevonandsomerset.co.uk/gigaclear-release-promotional-video/
Correction: 5/6ths of the CDS Phase 2 contracts were awarded to Gigaclear in Dec 2016, but roll out schedule was not approved by CDS until Dec 2017.
@GL Clearly your favourite topic but a little offtopic for this post? The only Phase 2 impact in Devon & Somerset is from Airband contact in the national parks which started in 2015. The gigaclear lots have no impact on these statistics at all.
@DevonPaddler: You make my point for me. CDS is one of the slowest county council run Phase 2 programmes in the UK.
North Yorkshire’s studies told them there was a reticence in the public to change supplier in such a massive way – ie to lose a BT-based line to an utterly new technology. That, I’m sure, has been one piece of data that has helped them keep choosing BT as a partner … when wireless could have been a contender.
I suspect that this reluctance plays its part in Airband’s current takeup. And we might see the same thing with Gigaclear.
Thanks, the phase 1+2 contracted premises has risen by 113k (another counties worth) since last time, does this mean routine change requests to absorb monies available? Some of the individual changes (>9k premises) are the size of subsequent procurements. This is a good thing as long it is the harder to reach areas. Some have gone down, Kent have lost 3k contracted premises. I guess we would need to understand if the new 113k were originally designated BT commercial or in the last 5-10% or a bit of each. 224k >24Mbps is good to see.
While the statement regarding BDUK Phase2 says “although some contracts are on-going until late 2018”, the reality is that quite a few builds aren’t due to start until 2019 or 2020. That’s very late 2018…
Many of those aren’t strictly Phase 2, they come under follow-on contracts that factor a different framework agreement with the EU and may also have different suppliers.
I’m not sure what is or isn’t strictly BDUK Phase 2, but in my area Fastershire are calling them Phase 2.
Take note that local councils may have many “phases”, which won’t necessarily follow the same naming conventions of BDUK’s phases. It’s best to treat council named “phases” as different.
Ok, I can accept that, but where do I find out what BDUK phase 2 builds are in the Fastershire area?
@AnotherTim https://www.gigaclear.com/postcode-checker/fastershire
@GrahamLong thanks, but that is where I got the 2019/2020 start dates from, but apparently the Fastershire Phase 2 builds may not be part of BDUK Phase 2. To be fair, the dates have moved forwards 6 months or so since they were first posted so hopefully they will stick to these. However, some people won’t see any improvement in their ADSL speeds for another 2+ years. The contract was approved by Gloucestershire in Nov 2016, so I don’t know where the Fast in Fastershire came from.
West Yorkshire numbers probably took a bit of a hit from Virgin Media’s deployment of what must be at least 50,000 premises by now.
If so, it’s not obvious from these numbers. For phase 1 BDUK West Oxfordshire saw an increase of 4.8% between June and December which is identical to the median for all authorities in England.
For those authorities with Phase 2 numbers, the median increase June to December was 7.0% and the West Oxfordshire figure was 7.8%.
In addition, how many of those VM deployments are in BDUK areas?
Not had chance to crunch all the numbers but the phase 2 West Yorks project is seeing a large overlap with Virgin Media networks (not sure who got there first), almost double the phase 1 overlap.
But the DCMS figure makes sense for over 24 Mbps via VDSL2 when allowing for the cable footprint.
VM started building in West Yorkshire in 2015. I would guesstimate overlap of 10%+ in Middleton, over a thousand premises.
VM then went on to build FTTP in market towns, villages and some urban infill, all of which had higher reliance on BDUK coverage than Middleton.
In our one small corner of the ward about 1700 premises covered by 7 cabinets, of which 4 totalling 400-450 premises were overbuilt by VM.