Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

CLA Call on Ofcom to Force UK Mobile Networks to Fix Rural Not-Spots UPDATE

Tuesday, Jun 26th, 2018 (10:45 am) - Score 878

The Country Land and Business Association, which represents thousands of landowners (farmers and businesses) in England and Wales, has once again called on Ofcom to pull rural parts of the UK out of the “digital dark age” by forcing Mobile operators to make 4Gavailable for all businesses and communities.”

The CLA’s on-going #4GForAll campaign aims to highlight the lack of rural mobile coverage and it has some support. In April 2018 more than 50 MPs called on the telecoms regulator to raise their proposed coverage obligations for the forthcoming 700MHz spectrum band auction (due to occur in 2019) so they align with the Government’s ambition for 95% geographic coverage by 2022.

At present Ofcom has only proposed that the 700MHz band, which is technically more intended for use by future 5G technologies (expected to launch commercially from 2020), should include an obligation that requires both better indoor reception and at least two operators must commit to reach 92% of the UK land area with good reception (details).

Mark Bridgeman, CLA Deputy President, said:

4G is vital to running a business. It is needed for marketing, communication and driving forward innovative technology. But rural businesses are being kept in a digital dark age because of mobile not-spots across the countryside.

Many rural communities have been abandoned by the mobile network operators who will only make investments in the countryside when forced to do so. Ofcom must demand more and challenge this reluctance to invest in rural areas.

We want 4G for all so that rural businesses and communities have the same advantages as their urban counterparts. With the challenges of Brexit, rural businesses will increasingly depend on good connectivity to become more productive and efficient.

To ensure the countryside is better connected, we need to see regulation introduced which imposes a more ambitious legally binding coverage obligation on all four major operators, plus action from Ofcom to force the mobile operators into providing much greater transparency of coverage performance and plans for rural areas.”

The comments come on the same day as a survey of 13,000 people from the Financial Conduct Authority revealed that consumers in rural areas of the United Kingdom are far less likely to use their Smartphones for banking than those in urban areas. Patchy broadband and mobile coverage took most of the blame.

On the flip side Ofcom’s CEO, Sharon White, last week suggested that providing good mobile network (4G etc.) coverage across virtually all of the UK’s landmass would cost up to around £6 billion (here) and this might require a different approach (e.g. cross-subsidy). Simply forcing operators to deliver universal coverage via an obligation might otherwise result in almost none of them bidding on the spectrum.

At this point we note that EE aims to rollout 4G to reach 95% geographic coverage by the end of December 2020 (currently 90%) and it’s hoped that others will follow. Many of their new masts will be built with investment from the Emergency Services Network (ESN) contract and those can be used by rivals too.

Meanwhile the CLA’s members have in the past also been considered somewhat of a barrier to deployment because of complications over wayleave agreements, which could for example force higher rents on some operators or stall deployments. However recent changes to the Electronics Communications Code (ECC) and the CLA’s newly revised wayleave framework may help to simplify this (here).

Mobile coverage, particularly via 5G connectivity, is currently one of the key focuses for the Government’s on-going Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review, which is due to reveal its proposals within the next few weeks.

UPDATE 27th June 2018

Mobile UK, which represents Three UK, Vodafone, O2 and EE, has today furnished us with a comment.

Hamish MacLeod, Director at Mobile UK, told ISPreview.co.uk:

“We wholeheartedly reject the CLA’s assertion that we have abandoned rural communities. The mobile networks have worked together to set out a positive vision for what is needed to extend coverage, and have been clear on the partnership model for achieving it. The CLA needs to work with operators on this and making Electronic Communication Code reforms effective in improving coverage and service.”

Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
10 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Meadmodj says:

    Sorry I raise it again. Trying to achieve full coverage for mobile is not the best/cheapest option. FTTP, WIFI and WIMAX (including public hotspots) are more appropriate if co-ordinated. If we do have rural targets it should be outdoor reception only. People can invest in external aerials and wifi routers if needed. You can buy an awful lot of FTTP with £6 billion.

  2. Avatar photo 3G Infinity (now 4G going on 5G) says:

    Two comments on CLA and Ofcom:

    a) CLA should focus on DCMS, they are able to make decisions to then change the approach Ofcom takes both in coverage obligations and making spectrum available

    b) Re Sharon’s figure of £6bn, that could be cut by half by not auctioning the 3.5GHz, 3.6GHz and 700MHz bands and running a beauty contest instead. £3bn saved by operators to spend on more coverage.

  3. Avatar photo dragoneast says:

    Just a bit of personal experience. Most of my traveling is in rural areas in the south and east. For the last 7 years I’ve noticed little difference year to year in coverage (or more properly non-coverage). But in the last 12 months I can now regularly get a decent signal (often 4G) where I had none previously. Even at home one operator now beats VDSL on uploads/downloads and ping. (The problem of course is that due to topography and layout, the same might not be true for my neighbour or in the next field, or wood, or over the next hill).

    Of course it all just illustrates the problem. We are all only interested in our own experience!

    1. Avatar photo AnotherTim says:

      I agree that 4G coverage has improved significantly in the last year or so. In my area 4G provides much better broadband speeds than the ADSL whereas just over a year ago it was hard to get a mobile signal at all. I think 4G should be a priority, as it benefits everyone, whether local resident or visitor – unlike FTTP which only benefits the few properties that it reaches. Of course as a broadband user I’d prefer FTTP were it available, but as a taxpayer I’d rather see better 4G coverage.

  4. Avatar photo Steve Jones says:

    The same CLA that defends high rural wayleave charges yet wants improved coverage…

  5. Avatar photo Michael V says:

    How many times we going to go through this? When the for Mobile Network Operators try they get blocked by land owners being difficult when it comes to access or demand high prices. This needs to be focused on more.

  6. Avatar photo chris conder says:

    A lot of places haven’t even got 2G yet. Most of B4RNland has no mobile coverage. Everyone moans about not wanting to help rural folk, as they choose to live in the countryside… well what if the rural landowners turn off the water and see how the towns manage, after all, those people chose to live there. The water board makes sure we all have water. The same should go for comms. One for all and all for one. And if a telco won’t provide it then the government should. It must cost a fortune to feed a city with water. Massive pipes and pumping stations. All the rural areas need is a tiny wee pipe with some fibre in it. Then all the masts would have a cheap feed for mobile.

    1. Avatar photo TheFacts says:

      Or some 240V and a bit of microwave.

    2. Avatar photo New_Londoner says:

      @Chris
      You missed the bit about greedy landowners being the problem here, wanting excessive wayleave payments before mobile operators can provide a service that increases the value of their land. Profiteering landowners holding back the rural economy!

      Are farmers part of the problem here? 😉

    3. Avatar photo Steve Jones says:

      Given the rural landowners don’t own the reservoirs, then I’m intrigued to know how they would plan to turn the water off. The assets are invariably owned by water companies and/or its ground water.

      Of course it costs a fortune to provide water to the cities, but then the customers in cities pay an even larger fortune back to the water companies for that water. What loses water companies (like all the utilities) is providing water to all the outliers. Even then, if a house is built in a rural area the developer gets to pay the full cost of connecting up water, power and sewage and that can be tens of thousands of pounds. It’s also the case that many area are not provided with mains gas or sewage because nobody is willing to pay the costs of connecting those services.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5515)
  2. BT (3514)
  3. Politics (2537)
  4. Openreach (2297)
  5. Business (2262)
  6. Building Digital UK (2244)
  7. FTTC (2043)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1973)
  9. Statistics (1788)
  10. 4G (1664)
  11. Virgin Media (1619)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1461)
  13. Fibre Optic (1395)
  14. Wireless Internet (1389)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon