Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

BT and Axione Lock Horns Over Scotland’s R100 Broadband Plan

Saturday, August 18th, 2018 (7:49 am) - Score 4,377
scotland r100 suppliers leak

The Scottish Government’s future £600m R100 (Reaching 100%) superfast broadband rollout programme could be facing a problem after sources told ISPreview.co.uk that Axione, one of three remaining bidders for the contract, had allegedly set its lawyers on BT (Openreach) over claims of anti-competitive behaviour.

At the time of writing Openreach and Axione have both informed us that they wouldn’t be commenting, but equally they didn’t deny that such a situation had arisen. Meanwhile we caught the Scottish Government a little late on Friday and as such they’re still checking whether any guidance or background can be offered, but they too have a policy of not commenting when it comes to ongoing legal proceedings.

The R100 project was first formally unveiled at the end of 2017 and its aim is to go beyond the existing £428m Digital Scotland (DSSB) scheme with BT by aspiring to make “superfast broadband” (30Mbps+) ISP networks available to “every single premise in Scotland” by the end of 2021 (here and here); March 2022 as a financial year.

Several suppliers including BT, Gigaclear, Axione and SSE Enterprise Telecoms were originally known to be bidding to supply the new scheme, which currently states that there will be 178,948 premises eligible for intervention across three regional lots (i.e. more may be required to reach 100% coverage).

Few people in the UK will be familiar with Axione as they’re not a household name over this side of the channel (no real presence in the consumer market), but as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the French Bouygues Group they’ve been building a lot of Fibre-to-the-Home (FTTH/P) infrastructure across parts of France and a little in Ireland. FTTH is increasingly important given the UK’s new hope for universal coverage by 2033 (here).

axione france

Arguably the uncertain outcome of Brexit and Axione’s lack of a significant pre-existing presence in the United Kingdom – at least around consumer fixed line broadband infrastructure – will have made them more of an outside bet compared with BT and Gigaclear (the latter is only present in England). On the other hand Scotland’s contract is a significant and attractive prospect for such an operator, which will have fuelled serious interest.

In the meantime any kind of legal problems could threaten the Scottish Government’s hope of being able to sign their first supplier contracts in January or February 2019. We may be able to update this article further next week, although it’s proven to be particularly difficult to get hold of our usual contacts during the summer holiday period.

Delicious
Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he is also the founder of ISPreview since 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
15 Responses
  1. NAT

    Sounds like electric/gas all over again. Don’t like the idea of foreign powers taking over the broadband market as well. Most of the main power companies are owned by the French, Germans and Spanish. Now maybe British broadband infrastructure.

  2. Brian

    Just hoping it won’t delay things further, after years of broken promises, the R100 is the only active hope. Waiting to see which premises will actually be covered by it.

  3. Matthew

    Hope this doesn’t get too delayed R100 looks to be a very promising development for Scotland far more than the USO for that region of the U.K.. does make you wonder why Westminister can’t find money for rest of U.K.

    • Joe

      Per head Scotland has far more money to spend due to fiscal transfers from England.

    • Matthew

      Agreed but still sure if they really tried the money could be found it’s not that unthinkable surely.

    • Mark

      @ Joe

      Do you mean aid, a loan or simply giving us money?

      I would also like to know what your meaning of fiscal transfer is?

    • Graycoll

      @ Mark

      I think Joe is referring to the monies allocated under the Barnett Formula that is the mechanism for adjusting the expenditure needed for devolved services (which includes broadband rollout by the four nations of the UK). This can be worked out by spending by nation or more controversially spending per capita, which is frequently quoted as being higher in Scotland that in England.

    • Joe

      @Mark As an example last yr Scotland spent ~11k/person and England ~9k. The different made by giving Scotland money (notionally from the UK budget but that in practice is England – As Ni/Wales also receive far more per head) The Amount given bares no relationship to the real differences. ie on any objective assessment Wales would get more and Scotland less.

      Yes England could spend more money but that either means more taxes or more borrowing. (I might argue that its good value spending but thats another issue) If the English spending was the same as Scotland then obviously the need for this would not exist.

    • Mark

      I knew exactly what he meant and it’s the way he meant it. Acting as if the money was simply being given out of Westminster’s pocket and not England’s pocket as the last time I checked we live in a United Kingdom governed by all for all and not just England.

      The Barnet formula is outaded but it is in no way as black and white as saying Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland get much more than England. England has a much larger population and it’s increasing year on year whereas the other 3 are staying much and such the same. Historically up until recently Scotland raised more taxes than England per capita as well and let’s not mention the already bloated money pit that is HS2 and it’s massive price tag.

      The north of England has much more to grumble about with the way Westminster is spending tax payers money south of the country and especially in and around London.

  4. Jim Weir

    Which of the 4 original bidders has dropped out? Either SSE Telecom or Gigaclear?

  5. Ogilvie Jackson

    Oh no , more delays. This is the last thing rural Scotland needs.
    Hope the Scottish Government says ,IF YOUR GOING TO SQUABBLE , FORGET IT and give the contract to Gigaclear.
    Our remote communities are desperate for R100 news and need to know who is going to get what and when.
    Keep at them ISP REVIEWS until they give you an answer.

    • Steve Jones

      Most likely legal action by one of the parties (and it would seem Axione are making the complaints) would impact on the whole process. The Scottish government would not simply be able to award the contract to Gigaclear out of frustration as the courts would have a say.

      Unfortunately, the story has no detail on the basis of any legal complaint by Axione save the anti-competitive action.

      I’d also suggest that legal action could be aimed at the procurement process itself if Axione felt that it was breaching competition issues.

  6. Ian Moya

    I live in aberdeen city centre

    cab 71

    4 years i’ve been told coming soon

    still stuck on adsl2 😐

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £15.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Code: BLACKFRIDAY
  • Vodafone £20.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.50
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £23.99 (*34.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Origin Broadband £24.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
Poll
*Javascript must be ON to vote*
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2265)
  2. FTTP (1723)
  3. FTTC (1498)
  4. Broadband Delivery UK (1480)
  5. Openreach (1213)
  6. Politics (1211)
  7. Business (1079)
  8. Statistics (952)
  9. Fibre Optic (871)
  10. Mobile Broadband (869)
  11. FTTH (803)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (800)
  13. Wireless Internet (796)
  14. 4G (753)
  15. Virgin Media (735)
  16. Sky Broadband (542)
  17. TalkTalk (519)
  18. EE (502)
  19. Vodafone (393)
  20. Security (367)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms  ,  Privacy and Cookie Policy  ,  Links  ,  Website Rules