Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Ofcom Warns O2 UK Over Response to Traffic Management Probe

Tuesday, Feb 5th, 2019 (11:40 am) - Score 5,205

The telecoms regulator has warned O2 (Telefonica UK) that there are “reasonable grounds” for believing that they failed to provide “accurate and complete answers” as part of last year’s investigation into the mobile operator’s Traffic Management practices on their 3G and 4G network.

At present the EU’s related Net Neutrality rules are applied using a self-regulatory approach in the UK via the 2016 Open Internet Code. This requires providers to treat all internet traffic equally without discrimination, restriction or interference (here). Essentially the code means that broadband ISPs and mobile operators cannot impose excessive restrictions against legal internet traffic, albeit with caveats for network management and security purposes etc.

In keeping with that Ofcom is understood to have raised a number of concerns with O2 last year, which resulted in the operator providing signed assurances and committing them to making a number of key changes by 30th April 2019.

O2’s Planned Changes

* To stop compressing streamed video content across their network, which is known as ‘rate control’; and

* To stop compressing any web content or images to manage traffic.

NOTE: O2 also confirmed that it has stopped using the Vasona platform to prioritise video and social media traffic when there is temporary congestion on the network. In addition, O2 also provided written assurances that:

* It will not reinstate these (or any similar) traffic management practices without telling us and updating its website first; and

* It will write to Ofcom as soon as possible, and no later than 30 April 2019, to confirm its compliance with these commitments.

The regulator was satisfied with those assurances and has chosen to take no further action, although they have decided to challenge O2 over the operator’s initial response (in February 2018) to a related information request about its Traffic Management practices (here).

According to Ofcom, O2 may have “failed to comply with the obligations imposed in the Request, by not providing accurate and complete information in its initial response.” The regulator has now issued O2 with a notification of their findings and will give them an opportunity to respond, before publishing their final decision.

Ofcom has various powers to require changes or impose penalties upon providers that don’t follow their rules.

Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
5 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Mike says:

    Considering how poor the speeds are currently on their network, I wonder how bad they will be without compression.

  2. Avatar photo Mark says:

    Hmm it’s funny how they’ve gone from one of the best networks with good coverage to the worst. And EE has gone the other way round.

    I shall give them this year to improve, if not I may move to Plusnet Mobile as they use EE. I’m with Tesco Mobile who have the packages I want and give good customer service.

    1. Avatar photo S Wakeman says:

      I was with Tesco for several years. Brilliant for customer service and pricing. Sadly left them because their coverage is shockingly bad, though no fault of theirs – except for using o2 as their infrastructure.

      The last straw was Criccieth in Wales. The place has a castle and a high street with hotels. I could barely get a 2G signal there whereas partner on EE had fast 4G all over. Unacceptable. I’ve heard they’ve been improving but not convinced. Why anyone in North Wales would use them or an MVNO that uses them is unfathomable.

  3. Avatar photo Richard lunt says:

    O2’s 4G is slower than 3G, I’m sure of it. I’ve been a loyal customer for more than 10 years but I’ll be off in December once my contract is up.

  4. Avatar photo captain.cretin says:

    O2 heavily prioritizes its own customers over those of 3rd parties using their network.

    They have repeatedly failed to sort out software/bandwidth limiting issues in Malvern for over 10 years. 4G isnt too awful (but not very good), but there is now NO 3G provision at all; lose 4G and you lose internet.
    Prior to the last 4G “upgrade”, 3G was limited to dial up speeds, even standing directly next to the local tower.

    The ONLY reason we still use GiffGaff/O2 is the cheap overseas calls to the inlaws in China.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Sky Broadband UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5526)
  2. BT (3518)
  3. Politics (2541)
  4. Openreach (2298)
  5. Business (2264)
  6. Building Digital UK (2246)
  7. FTTC (2044)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1975)
  9. Statistics (1789)
  10. 4G (1666)
  11. Virgin Media (1621)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1463)
  13. Fibre Optic (1395)
  14. Wireless Internet (1390)
  15. FTTH (1382)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon