Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

BT Calls for Open and Fair Access to Street Furniture for 5G Mobile

Thursday, March 21st, 2019 (11:49 am) - Score 5,618
lamp post

Telecoms giant BT (EE) has called for an “end to exclusive concessions agreements” on UK council owned street furniture, which they say has become a “barrier” to the roll-out of 4G and 5G mobile (mobile broadband) services, not least by only granting certain companies access to use it but not others.

A number of rival operators and other companies, such as wireless infrastructure firm Arqiva in London, have secured significant concession agreements that grant them access to build new small cell style mobile / WiFi infrastructure on top of or inside local street furniture (lampposts, CCTV columns etc.). Some such agreements can be exclusive and BT aren’t happy about having to pay a third-party for wholesale access.

BT plans to hold a workshop in Birmingham during April 2019 with local authorities and UK mobile operators, where they will propose the need for an alternative Open Access Model to help speed-up the roll out of further 4G and future 5G deployments by “promoting equivalent access and lowering the cost of investment.”

In support of this new proposed model, BT has also offered to hand back its own exclusivity arrangements around street furniture with the 9 UK cities where it currently has concessions agreements in place (i.e. Glasgow, Cardiff, Brighton, Plymouth, Carlisle, Newcastle/Gateshead, Nottingham, Gloucester and Leicester).

The operator also believes that recent changes to the Electronic Communications Code (ECC) – which came into force in December 2017 – “make such exclusivity agreements void“.

Paul Ceely, BT Group’s Director of Network Strategy, said:

“While the concessions model made sense in the early 2010’s when it first came into common use, the market and regulatory landscape have changed and it’s become clear that exclusivity agreements act as a barrier to further 4G and 5G investments. Government initiatives such as the DCMS Barrier Busting taskforce are showing the way, but we believe that industry needs to act. We are leading the way by handing back exclusivity in nine key areas.

The UK needs an alternative approach which sees industry and local authorities working together to share these street sites in an open and collaborative way. This will create the right environment for long-term investment and innovation in future mobile networks. We believe Open Access will be critical in ensuring the UK has the best mobile infrastructure in place to maintain its position as one of the world’s leading digital economies.”

Unpicking such agreements, particularly those that have been signed in recent years, could prove to be very difficult as many will already be attached to existing contracts that cannot simply be broken without consequence. On the other hand the fact that future 5G networks will require a denser infrastructure roll-out in cities means that this issue is suddenly much more important than it once was.

A question mark also exists over how such an Open Access Model would actually work, particularly as there’s only so much free space on street furniture and you can’t have multiple operators sticking lots of different kit within the same limited space (with a single operator it’s easy to cosmetically hide). One option might be to agree a shared setup and thus shared costs, but in this industry organising such agreements is like herding cats.

Add to Diigo
Tags: , , ,
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
10 Responses
  1. Avatar Martyn

    …said fair and open access to ducts and poles said the rest of the telecoms industry.

  2. Avatar Simon

    What a confusing message BT put out.

    18 March, “BT Shun Rural Mobile Roaming Plan from Three UK, O2 and Vodafone”

    21 March, “BT Calls for Open and Fair Access to Street Furniture for 5G Mobile”

    • Avatar TheFacts

      Not confusing, different things.

    • Avatar Andrew Robinson

      Not confusing, I just think it’s funny how that when other networks call for open access and such, BT seems to think it’s fine to not play ball and act like the big boy.

      Yet when they need it they cry for a little help, pathetic really, if BT want to have Open and Fair Access to other stuff, then maybe they should start doing this themselves.

      They are a bit like a school kid who wants to share other kid’s stuff without sharing back. What a real joke they are.

  3. Avatar James

    Fair and open access ? That’s bloody rich, enjoy your own medicine BT

  4. Avatar alan

    “BT aren’t happy about having to pay a third-party for wholesale access.”

    Welcome to the world you have inflicted upon others for decades, now sod off with your entitled tears.

  5. Avatar Not Happy

    I don’t recall anyone asking the public whether they actually want damn 5g, I don’t want all those extra frequencies around me! Haven’t we had enough?! Street furniture… Don’t make me laugh, time to find up my signal blockers

  6. Avatar Alex Williamson

    It’s a reasonable ask, 5G densification will be significantly constrained unless the right to use structures and “dark fibre” connections for fronthaul is not standardised and made commercially viable. Local authorities have looked to generate as much revenue as possible from their structures without considering the benefits to their residents and businesses that better connectivity brings.

  7. Avatar Rob

    Very funny BT. Will BT share their telephone boxes, exchanges and perhaps street furniture BTS’s?

  8. Avatar Duncan

    By already share their phone boxes with the council. That’s why the council are able to close all the public toilets when there is a pay phone box

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £20.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.45 (*36.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Post Office £22.90 (*37.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Direct Save Telecom £22.95 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2512)
  2. FTTP (2204)
  3. FTTC (1658)
  4. Building Digital UK (1607)
  5. Politics (1428)
  6. Openreach (1419)
  7. Business (1239)
  8. Statistics (1099)
  9. FTTH (1076)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1039)
  11. Fibre Optic (969)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (916)
  13. Wireless Internet (909)
  14. 4G (900)
  15. Virgin Media (857)
  16. Sky Broadband (595)
  17. EE (592)
  18. TalkTalk (580)
  19. Vodafone (518)
  20. Security (413)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact