The annual 2020 world speeds report from research firm M-Lab and Cable.co.uk has revealed that the United Kingdom delivered an average (mean) broadband ISP download speed of 37.82Mbps, ranking us just 47th fastest in the world (that’s sharply down from 34th last year). But there are some caveats to this report.
The research stems from information gathered via 577 million speed tests (up from the 276 million conducted last year), which were carried out across the world. The average global broadband download speed was recorded as 24.83Mbps, which is more than double the 11.03Mbps recorded last year.
However, M-Lab‘s measurement platform was upgraded for 2020 and this has skewed year-on-year speed tracking, which means a direct comparison with the Mbps figures from previous years would be misleading (i.e. the average global broadband speed actually increased by a fairly steady c.20%). We should also point out that some 221 countries were included in this report, which is up from 207 last year.
Despite this we note that the average UK speed of 37.82Mbps (Megabits per second) under the new system is still well below the 64Mbps recorded by Ofcom’s 2020 fixed line broadband speeds report (here). Admittedly Ofcom used a different methodology to M-Lab (i.e. the regulator directly tested connections via a modified router, which rules out key issues like poor WiFi and local network load etc.), but that’s still a huge gap.
Despite this the UK has still seen its ranking tumble down the table this year and the report notes that we’re “now among the slowest countries in Europe.” As before, this is due in no small part to being behind on our “full fibre” (FTTP) deployments and other gigabit-capable network coverage (here and here). Suffice to say, the top countries in today’s study all have strong FTTP coverage, although the UK is starting to rapidly improve but it’s a long game of catch-up ahead.
As usual speed testing based reports like this should be taken with a pinch of salt because they can easily be misinterpreted. In particular, nobody should be equating such studies to directly reflect the availability of faster connections as the two are far from being in sync. On top of that people are more likely to measure their speed if there is something wrong or if they aren’t getting the speed they need, which can produce a negative bias.
At present it’s estimated that fixed “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) networks are available to over 96% of UK premises and 25% can access a “gigabit” (1Gbps+) capable network, although many people have yet to upgrade (i.e. they cannot afford, are aware of or even feel the need to upgrade). However, roughly a quarter of premises still subscribe to far slower copper ADSL lines, despite most being within reach of faster networks.
Speed tests like this can also be impacted by other factors, such as poor home wiring, user choice of package (e.g. 1Gbps could be available but most people may still pick a slower and cheaper tier), local network congestion (i.e. conducting a test while others or background tasks are using the network) and slow home WiFi etc. Likewise, it’s unclear whether this study has also lumped Mobile Broadband (4G etc.) speeds or business connections in with fixed line services.
Nevertheless, if we assume that such caveats will apply to all countries then the data is still useful as a rough gauge of market change and take-up across the world. The good news is that the UK Government plan to invest £5bn to boost gigabit broadband coverage across the final 20% of hardest to reach areas by the end of 2025, even if their target does seem to have been watered down.. yet again (here).
The bad news is that 2025 remains a long way away and we’re ultimately playing catch-up with those who have been deploying at scale for many years longer. We warned in last year’s report that the UK’s ranking was likely to slip and indeed that has now come to pass.
221 Countries Ranked by Average (Mean) Download Speed
Rank | Country | Avg. Download Speed (Mbps) |
1 | Liechtenstein | 229.98 |
2 | Jersey | 218.37 |
3 | Andorra | 213.41 |
4 | Gibraltar | 183.09 |
5 | Luxembourg | 118.05 |
6 | Iceland | 116.88 |
7 | Switzerland | 110.45 |
8 | Hong Kong | 105.32 |
9 | Monaco | 104.98 |
10 | Hungary | 99.74 |
11 | Netherlands | 95.60 |
12 | Aruba | 89.81 |
13 | Malta | 87.36 |
14 | Denmark | 85.03 |
15 | Aland Islands | 81.31 |
16 | Sweden | 81.29 |
17 | Bermuda | 73.60 |
18 | Singapore | 72.75 |
19 | Slovak Republic | 72.26 |
20 | United States | 71.30 |
21 | Estonia | 70.90 |
22 | Norway | 67.31 |
23 | New Zealand | 66.66 |
24 | Belgium | 66.49 |
25 | Slovenia | 65.46 |
26 | Romania | 61.08 |
27 | Cayman Islands | 57.96 |
28 | Barbados | 56.90 |
29 | Republic of Lithuania | 56.63 |
30 | Spain | 55.84 |
31 | Poland | 55.40 |
32 | Taiwan | 54.77 |
33 | Japan | 54.62 |
34 | Canada | 52.60 |
35 | Latvia | 52.32 |
36 | France | 51.33 |
37 | Puerto Rico | 47.87 |
38 | Malaysia | 46.82 |
39 | Bulgaria | 46.22 |
40 | Isle of Man | 44.16 |
41 | Finland | 44.05 |
42 | Germany | 42.33 |
43 | Republic of Korea | 40.81 |
44 | Grenada | 38.64 |
45 | Bahamas | 38.14 |
46 | Portugal | 37.99 |
47 | United Kingdom | 37.82 |
48 | Guernsey | 36.83 |
49 | Panama | 36.55 |
50 | Turks and Caicos Islands | 36.29 |
51 | Ireland | 34.87 |
52 | Croatia | 33.82 |
53 | Thailand | 30.61 |
54 | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | 30.31 |
55 | Trinidad and Tobago | 29.70 |
56 | United Arab Emirates | 28.33 |
57 | Czechia | 28.12 |
58 | Austria | 27.74 |
59 | Republic of Moldova | 27.48 |
60 | Israel | 26.49 |
61 | Greece | 26.01 |
62 | Australia | 25.65 |
63 | Montenegro | 25.07 |
64 | Russian Federation | 24.98 |
65 | Serbia | 24.74 |
66 | San Marino | 24.26 |
67 | Qatar | 23.98 |
68 | Italy | 23.18 |
69 | Uruguay | 22.16 |
70 | Virgin Islands, U.S. | 21.39 |
71 | Curaçao | 20.87 |
72 | Sri Lanka | 20.73 |
73 | Kosovo | 20.30 |
74 | Jamaica | 20.01 |
75 | Vatican City | 19.12 |
76 | Greenland | 18.65 |
77 | Madagascar | 18.00 |
78 | Brazil | 17.89 |
79 | Belize | 16.57 |
80 | Paraguay | 16.50 |
81 | Costa Rica | 16.42 |
82 | Réunion | 16.35 |
83 | Saint Lucia | 16.35 |
84 | Mexico | 16.19 |
85 | Chile | 16.10 |
86 | Belarus | 16.08 |
87 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 15.69 |
88 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 15.66 |
89 | Cyprus | 15.62 |
90 | Faroe Islands | 15.47 |
91 | New Caledonia | 15.15 |
92 | Ukraine | 15.09 |
93 | Macau | 14.66 |
94 | Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan | 14.54 |
95 | Saint Martin | 14.49 |
96 | Bonaire, Saint Eustatius and Saba | 14.28 |
97 | South Africa | 14.04 |
98 | Martinique | 14.02 |
99 | Virgin Islands, British | 13.63 |
100 | Georgia | 13.50 |
101 | India | 13.46 |
102 | Vietnam | 13.41 |
103 | Saudi Arabia | 12.67 |
104 | Albania | 12.36 |
105 | Oman | 12.25 |
106 | Kuwait | 12.06 |
107 | Armenia | 11.86 |
108 | Guadeloupe | 11.49 |
109 | North Macedonia | 11.48 |
110 | American Samoa | 11.28 |
111 | Bahrain | 10.87 |
112 | Dominican Republic | 10.69 |
113 | Dominica | 9.96 |
114 | Antigua and Barbuda | 9.63 |
115 | Northern Mariana Islands | 9.53 |
116 | Brunei | 8.97 |
117 | Turkey | 8.86 |
118 | Fiji | 8.83 |
119 | Colombia | 8.80 |
120 | Philippines | 8.77 |
121 | Ecuador | 8.48 |
122 | Kenya | 8.20 |
123 | Peru | 7.98 |
124 | Guatemala | 7.61 |
125 | Lesotho | 7.43 |
126 | Mauritius | 7.28 |
127 | Indonesia | 7.16 |
128 | Saint Kitts and Nevis | 7.11 |
129 | Myanmar | 7.11 |
130 | Zimbabwe | 6.92 |
131 | Liberia | 6.83 |
132 | Nicaragua | 6.65 |
133 | Cape Verde | 6.64 |
134 | Morocco | 6.55 |
135 | Saint Barthélemy | 6.30 |
136 | Argentina | 6.20 |
137 | El Salvador | 6.13 |
138 | Guam | 5.95 |
139 | Honduras | 5.93 |
140 | Senegal | 5.93 |
141 | Maldives | 5.88 |
142 | French Guiana | 5.80 |
143 | Haiti | 5.75 |
144 | Tunisia | 5.66 |
145 | Cote D’Ivoire | 5.55 |
146 | Kyrgyzstan | 5.47 |
147 | Ghana | 5.46 |
148 | Anguilla | 5.38 |
149 | Mongolia | 5.25 |
150 | Nepal | 5.22 |
151 | Cambodia | 5.21 |
152 | Uganda | 5.16 |
153 | Bolivia | 5.06 |
154 | Kazakhstan | 5.01 |
155 | Azerbaijan | 4.89 |
156 | Comoros | 4.85 |
157 | Egypt | 4.71 |
158 | Sint Maarten | 4.69 |
159 | Bhutan | 4.62 |
160 | United Republic of Tanzania | 4.54 |
161 | Eswatini | 4.51 |
162 | Iran | 4.50 |
163 | Federated States of Micronesia | 4.49 |
164 | Lao People’s Democratic Republic | 4.47 |
165 | Guyana | 4.43 |
166 | Suriname | 4.42 |
167 | Gabon | 4.37 |
168 | French Polynesia | 4.28 |
169 | Palau | 4.24 |
170 | Burkina Faso | 4.19 |
171 | Angola | 4.15 |
172 | Malawi | 4.07 |
173 | Burundi | 4.04 |
174 | Togo | 4.03 |
175 | Seychelles | 3.96 |
176 | Namibia | 3.91 |
177 | Sierra Leone | 3.86 |
178 | Zambia | 3.84 |
179 | Rwanda | 3.80 |
180 | Mayotte | 3.52 |
181 | Mozambique | 3.47 |
182 | Mali | 3.45 |
183 | Nigeria | 3.34 |
184 | Bangladesh | 3.24 |
185 | Cuba | 3.16 |
186 | Palestine | 3.13 |
187 | Guinea | 3.04 |
188 | Botswana | 2.78 |
189 | Cameroon | 2.78 |
190 | Niger | 2.77 |
191 | Marshall Islands | 2.75 |
192 | Iraq | 2.69 |
193 | Papua New Guinea | 2.67 |
194 | Libya | 2.60 |
195 | Lebanon | 2.34 |
196 | Chad | 2.25 |
197 | Vanuatu | 2.22 |
198 | Pakistan | 2.14 |
199 | Uzbekistan | 2.10 |
200 | China | 2.09 |
201 | DR Congo | 2.06 |
202 | Republic of the Congo | 2.00 |
203 | São Tomé and Príncipe | 1.99 |
204 | Algeria | 1.83 |
205 | Benin | 1.67 |
206 | Guinea-Bissau | 1.61 |
207 | Venezuela | 1.61 |
208 | Gambia | 1.60 |
209 | Djibouti | 1.50 |
210 | Mauritania | 1.47 |
211 | Afghanistan | 1.37 |
212 | Sudan | 1.35 |
213 | Somalia | 1.14 |
214 | Ethiopia | 1.12 |
215 | Tajikistan | 1.01 |
216 | Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste | 0.89 |
217 | Syrian Arab Republic | 0.76 |
218 | Equatorial Guinea | 0.75 |
219 | Turkmenistan | 0.74 |
220 | Yemen | 0.65 |
221 | South Sudan | 0.58 |
UPDATE 4:55pm
Rural ISP County Broadband has just added a comment.
Lloyd Felton, CEO of County Broadband, said:
“We’re disappointed but not surprised to see once again another report showing that the UK is languishing near the bottom of a global broadband league.
The Covid-19 lockdown exposed just how poor and unfit the UK’s current copper-based digital infrastructure is – from Zoom meeting drop-outs to Netflix binge bufferings. We urgently need to catch up with the rest of the world by building new Hyperfast networks.
We were thrilled to connect the first set of thousands of residents and businesses to our growing network during lockdown in Essex, with engineers being granted key worker status.
We are continuing to hold virtual public meetings and progress our rollout plans to turbo-charge broadband for thousands more in desperate need.”
Self-serving and myopic ‘research’ from a switching site.
The best switching site is this site, the review section is gold.
According this this data, many if not most of the third world countries have much better average broadband speeds than myself and many other rural UK households. Will the BT/Openreach, Ofcom and the UK government discrimination of Rural UK citizens ever end?
ISPs are pretty much incentivised not to lay cables to rural locations due to their lack of demand. The UK government is trying to solve it by throwing money at the problem so they can meet their 2025 “gigabit-capable” goals. Nevertheless, as time goes on, rural internet will improve as newer technologies allow for things like the lower cost of laying down fibre cables or wider adaption of 5G or faster fixed wireless technologies.
Be careful what you wish for. Some countries achieve high average speeds by simply declining to serve locations that would lower the average. The U.K. is very high up the list of broadband availability. Some countries have very high average speeds but only available to people who live in major cities.
The U.K. could storm up this table by turning off rural customers completely. Any sensible measure must include bandwidth, affordability and availability.
This story in 2018 pretty much summed it up back then.
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2018/01/government-hails-95-uk-coverage-24mbps-superfast-broadband.html
This was a collective pat on the back for UK government and perceived as a case of JOB DONE the UK is now “superfast”!
This is why. If MP’s who are predominantly less likely to understand most things technical see a sentence like that it makes them wonder why anyone needs anything faster.
From this article “At present it’s estimated that fixed “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) networks are available to over 96% of UK premises”
So in 2 years they’ve managed another 1% then!
The reality is the entire UK industry rested on their laurels, paid their execs big bonuses and invested very little.
24Mbps may have been superfast in 2010, but I wouldn’t award it the moniker “fast” in 2020 because it isn’t. 24Mbps in 2020 is “adequate” at best, and utterly useless when you actually need it to download really big files (or update a console game!).
The wording of how fast broadband is in the UK is now impeding our progress to the real fast services.
Superfast 24Mbps needs to be rebranded “adequate” and sold as such IMHO.
I am not surprised we are low on the list.
Considering there are 610,000 properties below Superfast (24Mbs), paid for with public money, and if you take into consideration Superfast is now 30Mbs, there will be many more.
It would have been more informative if the UK figures were split into the individual countries, guess this will come in time 🙂
It would have been a different picture if the government had made the correct decision in 1998, and now history is repeating it self.
It’s time to stop lying to ourselves. We need to ban the advertising of Virgin Media’s DOCSIS broadband and Openreach’s telephone-line broadband as “fibre”.
Unless there’s a fibre optic cable going into your property they shouldn’t be allowed to call it Fibre.
Next we need to abandon this delusion that copper will ever deliver the results we want. DOCSIS 3.1 and G-Fast are just delaying the inevitable and burying our heads in the sand to the realty that we need to spend a lot of cash and build a full fibre, fully connected country – and we should have done it 5-10 years ago like everyone else.
Everyone else? There are only a handful of countries that have done that.