The High Court has ordered six of the UK’s largest broadband ISPs – Sky Broadband, BT, Plusnet, TalkTalk, Virgin Media and EE – to block customers from accessing a website called Mixdrop, which is described as a “cyberlocker” that facilitated internet piracy (copyright infringement) by allowing users to stream or download TV and film content.
Such blocking orders, which are supported by Section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CDPA), tend to be expensive to bring but have in recent years become very common. Hundreds of websites have been blocked through this approach (thousands if you include their many proxies and mirrors), which usually include file sharing (P2P / Torrent), video streaming sites, Sci-Hub and those that sell counterfeit goods etc.
In this case the High Court granted an application made on behalf of Columba Pictures, Disney Enterprises, Netflix Studios, Paramount Pictures, Universal City Studios, Warner Bros – collectively represented by the Motion Picture Association (MPA) – and also Sky. The Mixdrop site was also said to be a “major provider of stolen Sky and other paid TV offerings.”
While there have been more than a few applications like this made by the MPA and others in the UK, this is said to be the first time an order has been granted in the UK against a cyberlocker hosting TV film and TV content. Most cyberlockers are just fairly linear online file storage services, but Mixdrop appears to have gone much further than that (it doesn’t look much like a cyberlocker).
A Sky spokesperson said:
“We’re really pleased with this decision. It confirms that these types of sites are acting illegally, blocks access to one of the most prolific providers of stolen Sky content and ultimately helps keep consumers safe from the very real risks of accessing content in this way.”
An MPA EMEA spokesperson said:
“We welcome this decision from the High Court which represents a first for the film and TV industry. Cyberlocker and stream-ripping sites make available vast amounts of copyright protected film and television content for streaming and/or downloading, making millions in the process.
Site blocking continues to be an effective way of halting the spread of online piracy. Piracy affects everyone involved in the creative process – from the filmmakers to the makeup artists. It also adversely affects consumers, exposing them to malware, identity theft and fraud. This verdict comes perfectly timed to celebrate Safer Internet Day on 8 February.”
Despite the ease by which such blocks can be circumvented by internet users, Rights Holders often still deem them to be useful as part of their wider efforts to discourage casual piracy. Some studies (example) have similarly suggested that sites blocked in this way tend to result in increased traffic going to legal alternatives. But this may be countered as content in the legal streaming market becomes increasingly fragmented across multiple platforms, not to mention these are becoming much more expensive.
The ISPs now have 10 days to comply with the order and block the site.
These blocks just serve as advertisements for the sites in question.
I’d never heard of it before, I will check it when not connected to work VPN 😉
Why pay to advertise your website when the High Court will do it for nothing?
if i was a user of this site my next google search would be “Mixdrop alternative”
So glad I’m not with any of these ISPs.
Just use a VPN then it doesn’t matter.
to further what Mike says, use a VPN anyway
I have a VPN and getting round it with a VPN isn’t the point. I don’t want to give my money to an ISP who will mess with my internet connection like that.
Im with Three network 5G broadband anyways
I just went to the .co version of the site & it just looks like a file sharing site.
I then went to the .me version and see what they are talking about!!
I clicked a random link and a few popups saying my machine has been infected etc etc.
I always wonder how these sites make money, I’m still non the wiser.
Also the main page is unsecure for some reason……
Oh, three little letters that will bypass all the blocks they put in place. Nice attempt, though.
I went there with Adguard running and not a single popup or ad showed for me (a godsend of an application) and every film under the sun on there streaming at 1080p. So nothing to download it was all streaming. This is like the Streisand effect on overdrive as I had never heard of this site before today
I am against Pirated copyright material. But with that said music is so dam expensive I don’t blame them. You get reissue after reissue it’s all just big money making scam. If was a music artist I would make my album that everything on the disc 1 or disc 2. I wouldn’t reissue cd with add more songs or remixes. I would make sure all the tracks that are on disc 1 and remixes on disc 2. If there was a need for a third disc I would added the disc it that time.
I am against Pirated copyright material. But with that said music is so dam expensive I don’t blame them. You get reissue after reissue it’s all just big money making scam. If was a music artist I would make sure my album has everything on the disc 1 or disc 2. I wouldn’t reissue cd with more songs or remixes. I would make sure all the tracks that are on disc 1 and remixes are on disc 2. If there was a need for a third disc I would add the tracks on the disc it that time.
Sorry the spelling
Thanks for letting me know of the site
Personally, I think the length of copyright isn’t long enough. It should be life + 200 years.
I don’t know why they even bother. All they do is advertise the site. I have no interest in mixdrop but I got on it without any problems via a VPN