A group of five independent UK broadband ISPs – Gigabit Networks, Triangle Networks, Air Broadband, Highnet and Trunk Networks – have formed a new consortium called the ‘Rebel Alliance‘ (Lucasfilm and Star Wars might have words), which appears to be demanding better service levels and lower prices.
The companies involved are all reflective of a “new generation ISPs” who are connecting families to the new gigabit-speed broadband networks that are being installed across the country. According to the announcement, the alliance states that “more should be done to increase services levels and lower costs to avoid widening the country’s digital divide.”
The alliance goes on to highlight all of the recent annual price hikes from major broadband ISPs, some of which went up to 9.3% and next year could be much worse. In terms of what the consortium actually wants to see, they’re demanding “greater support for those struggling with essential household bills” and calling for social tariffs to be “better advertised” (awareness is one of the biggest problems).
In addition, they’re also calling on the infrastructure providers who lay fibre cabling (e.g. Openreach, VMO2, CityFibre etc.) to demonstrate “leadership and empathy“, not least by “making a greater financial contribution towards ensuring that affordable social internet pricing is made available to as many people as possible.”
David Yates, CEO of Gigabit Networks and Founding member of the Alliance, said:
“The ability to connect to the Internet is no longer a luxury but a necessity, simply because so many essential services, including applying for Universal Credit itself, take place online.
Despite this, it seems like our industry still views being able to access fast and reliable internet as a consumer choice, with the quality of the internet you receive connected to your willingness and ability to pay.
At a time of rising household costs across the board, we in the Rebel Alliance think that this is totally unacceptable and it is incumbent on the entire industry, which includes the infrastructure firms, to work together to increase internet affordability and make social tariffs readily available across the board to those who are eligible for them.”
The alliance appears to be taking a refreshingly pro-consumer stance above, albeit by adopting a position that is mostly sound bites and quite limited in substance. For example, social tariffs should be better advertised and ISPs could do more to help those who may be struggling to pay their bills. But at the same time, the supporting ISPs haven’t said specifically what should be done and they don’t appear to have launched social tariffs of their own.
Most retail ISPs would probably also agree with the call for infrastructure providers to help contribute to the creation of social tariffs. Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that such things are rarely free and may result in higher wholesale prices in other areas to compensate.
In addition, the desire for greater affordability doesn’t always mix well with the desire for greater service quality, or, for that matter, the need for infrastructure providers to gain a viable return on the huge investment being made to deploy full fibre networks. However, many of the alternative networks that we see are already pricing aggressively in order to steal customers away from more established players.
UPDATE 3:45pm
On the question of why the ISPs haven’t launched social tariffs, David has kindly provided a bit of extra context: “All of the local altnets in the Alliance have had requests for full-fibre products for social housing residents and many have tried to launch them but even when they have discounted products as far as they can, they can’t get to a price point that is acceptable to residents. In order to meet the gap they need the infrastructure players to step up so altnets in the Alliance – and elsewhere – can deliver a social housing product and include the digitally excluded.”
For goodness sake
The cost that idol’s are using to increase their profits, ie. cpi+3.9 % is beginning to look a lot like profiteering from where I stand. A 12%rise can never be justified, yet plusnet, BT etc are doing so. What happened to protection for the consumer?
So, in summary, a bunch of companies want cheaper prices and better service.
Can I add to that list my desire to marry Nicole Sherzinger?
Rather ironic that Highnet/Brawband want better service levels. Perhaps they should look closer to home and get their own house in order first. Example: their support staff think 1GB data usage is huge on a Gigabit FTTP line. I kid you not.
100% one of their sales people claimed I would never be able to use that much data lol I kid not he had no training I would guess?
There is no usage limit on BrawBand – there was an old AUP on the website when first launched and that was corrected over a year ago.
In general, ISPs are more likely to earn greater margins from the sale of services that the network providers, noting that the latter typically have to invest substantial sums of capital in order to generate a return in perhaps ten years. In comparison, ISPs are much less capital intensive and enjoy rather better margins on their operations, with the network typically a small percentage of their retail price.
In other words, it’s pretty much in the gift of ISPs to offer social tariffs and not especially reasonable to look to network operators for a contribution. The “Rebel Alliance” should really be able to get on with it without help from anyone else, just like some of their competitors,
Let see them lower their pricing
Virtue signaling rainbow colors already made ahead of June
Distress move. Punters not buying, someone else’s fault. Sounds more like Fred Karno’s army than the Rebel Alliance.
This is pretty cringe. This might well go into the ‘seemed a good idea at the time’ file. That time may be pretty brief if Disney get wind of this.