Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

Frustration as Ofcom See Delay to Faster UK Broadband ISP Switching UPDATE5

Monday, Apr 3rd, 2023 (8:42 am) - Score 5,144
consumer switching uk broadband and phone

Consumers looking to change broadband providers in the UK will be unhappy to learn that the UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has confirmed a delay to the introduction of their faster and more extensive One Touch Switch (OTS) migration system – possibly by 6 months or more – because ISPs are not yet ready to support it.

At present, switching between ISPs on Openreach’s national network is a fairly easy and largely automated Gaining Provider Led (GPL) process (i.e. just contact your new ISP to start it). The catch is that it doesn’t work for operators on physically separate networks, such as Cityfibre, Hyperoptic, Virgin Media and many more (Summary of UK Full Fibre Builds), and takes up to 10 working days to run its course.

NOTE: The old switching process allowed 10 workings days for the change, largely to protect against SLAMMING (i.e. being switched without your express consent). But the new system aims to do this in just 1 day “where technically possible”.

The regulator sought to rectify both challenges with their OTS system, which would make switching between ISPs – on any fixed line network – faster, cheaper (i.e. no need to pay for two services at once) and result in less connectivity downtime for consumers.

Ofcom finalised all this back in September 2021 and, in recognition of the huge complexity involved with trying to adapt this to work across lots of different networks, gave the industry until 3rd April 2023 to implement it. But getting all ISPs to work together (essential for OTS to function properly) and establish a common approach has not been a quick or easy process.

In response, broadband providers from across the industry established The One Touch Switching Company (TOTSCo) as a not-for-profit vehicle – owned by the membership – to take responsibility for the development and operation of the related messaging platform. But this was only setup in June 2022 and that left very little time for development and testing of an extremely complex system, which for many smaller ISPs meant effectively starting from scratch (see last year’s article for more detail).

Suffice to say that delays were looking inevitable and, at our last update in January 2023 (here), TOTSCo informed ISPreview that their current “best estimate” for when the Hub itself would be available for users in a “test environment” is around August to November 2023 (subject to revision). This suggested to us that full deployment may not happen until 2024, since testing across such a complex market will probably take months. As one major ISP told us late last year – “It’s not that we won’t be ready in April – it’s that the whole industry won’t be ready.”

Ofcom has previously informed us that they were “very concerned” at the slow pace of progress. At the same time, they also warned ISPs that a failure to be ready in time could be considered a breach of their rules, albeit without saying what action they’d take – the carrot (patiently delay implementation) or the stick (fines / punishment until it’s ready).

In the end, Ofcom has confirmed that OTS is not ready for launch and have opened an investigation (enforcement programme), but their update admits that they don’t know how long it will take before the new system is actually ready.

Cristina Luna-Esteban, Ofcom’s Director of Telecoms Consumer Protection, said:

“Industry has had plenty of warning, plenty of time and plenty of support to get this done. It’s extremely disappointing and frustrating, and providers have let their customers down.

We take compliance with our rules very seriously, and have launched enforcement action to make sure companies get this up and running as quickly as possible.”

But not all ISPs agree that the fault rests with them, and have shifted some of the blame back on to the regulator.

James Warner, CSO of FullFibre Ltd., said:

“To say the delay to One Touch Switch is disappointing is a huge understatement. This process was announced in 2021, and we are still waiting for it to become a reality. Making switching easy for consumers will provide massive benefits to the fibre market, and they are having to wait for even longer to be able to easily adopt better broadband deals.

This is another example of Ofcom falling short when it comes to supporting the wider fibre sector, specifically, the altnets like FullFibre that are working extremely hard to build alternative networks and support Project Gigabit in fairly adverse conditions.”

On the one hand it’s easy to understand Ofcom’s frustration in all this, after all they’ve spent the past few years laying the groundwork for it via several long-winded industry consultations. Perhaps one problem with this approach is that, over that same period, the market has exploded with a mass of new infrastructure level competitors, many of which will be too new to have become fully engaged in the regulator’s earlier process.

Equally, Ofcom could have perhaps been more proactive in helping the industry to establish TOTSCo much sooner, since it seemed clear that such a centralised platform would be necessary and require the engagement of all ISPs. Setting such things up was always going to be a painfully slow and complex process, not least since getting masses of ISPs and networks to work co-operatively together can sometimes be a bit like herding cats.

At the end of the day, consumers will now have to wait much longer before they’re able to see the benefits of OTS and, in a market with this many alternative networks – where fear of switching is a known problem for many consumers (i.e. risk of extra costs and downtime) – that’s hugely disappointing. On top of that, it remains unclear whether ISPs will even be ready come the new deadline.

Meanwhile, the Independent Networks Co-operative Association (INCA), which represents UK alternative broadband ISP networks, has set out an action plan to help firms stay on the right side of Ofcom (we’re told ISPs that follow this are likely to be considered compliant by the regulator). INCA are also happy to provide advice to anyone impacted by the OTS process, whether members or not (call 0330 113 2074 or email ots@inca.coop), and they have an OTS webinar on Thursday 27th April.

INCA notes that Ofcom’s delay is not letting firms off the hook, and they need to be warned that they now have a few months to get all their customer services systems ready for when the switch-on does happen. This delay will not be considered a reason why operators have not got themselves together in the back office.

At the time of writing, the regulator has not yet issued their official position, and they may formally wait until the 3rd April deadline has passed before doing so.

UPDATE 9:31am

TOTSCo has revealed that they’re now entering a short period of exclusive negotiations with Tech Mahindra, to conclude a contract for the design and build of the TOTSCo Hub with associated technical and business support services.

The Hub is an essential part of the plan, but it also shows just how much work is left before OTS can be turned into a fully functional platform. “Currently we believe that the release of the Hub for industry to start their OTS testing will be within the August to October window that was previously announced,” said TOTSCo’s bulletin (that’s just for the testing phase, which could take months).

In addition, we are now expecting Ofcom to issue a statement this morning.

UPDATE 10:10am

Ofcom has just stated that they “have been closely monitoring industry’s progress in implementing the changes, and have been putting pressure on providers to meet their requirements by today’s deadline. Unfortunately, the new process has not been introduced on time. As a result, we have launched an industry-wide enforcement programme, following this failure to meet a regulatory deadline.”

The regulator added that “it is the responsibility of all providers to make sure they comply with our rules, including any changes we make to them. As in other sectors, the broadband industry – which is made up of hundreds of companies – has trade associations that help keep providers up to date with regulatory developments.” But they also admit that ISPs “are yet to give an indication of when they will be ready” to go live.

The big question now is how much slack Ofcom will give ISPs under their enforcement programme or if they’ll proceed to punishment. The regulator may blame ISPs, and technically they’re right to do so, but at the same time they do now have to deal with masses of new alternative networks that are still in the earliest stages of establishing themselves.

Put another way, today’s market is no longer dominated by just two major networks, which made it much easier for Ofcom to take a hands-off approach in the past when making major changes. Today’s market is much more complex and in that kind of environment a regulator may need to be more hands-on to get the result it wants.

UPDATE 12:20pm

A new Uswitch.com survey, which is based off an Opinium surveye of 2,000 UK adults from February 2023 to March 2023, has claimed that over 11 million people plan to change ISP in the next 12 months, but still have misplaced concerns about switching broadband – thus potentially costing £1.85 billion in overpayments – partly due to today’s delay. The top reasons broadband customers are put off switching providers include a fear of being cut off (23%), confrontational sales calls (13%) and concerns about being charged twice (12%).

However, we should point out that, in our experience, only a much smaller portion of that claimed 11 million actually do end up switching ISP each year or at the end of their current term (usually around 9-15%). The consumer ambition to switch is thus often a lot higher than the reality.

UPDATE 12:42pm

We’ve had a comment from Openreach.

Mark Shurmer, MD of Regulatory Affairs at Openreach, said:

“We agree with Ofcom this is a really important issue. For a long time customers have been able to switch easily between service providers who use our network, so it’s only fair that customers who currently use other networks should be able to upgrade to our services just as simply and easily. We’ve been ready to implement the new policy for some time now, and we look forward to industry getting these changes implemented for the benefit of consumers and businesses throughout the UK.”

UPDATE 1:40pm

A comment has come in from ISP YouFibre (Netomnia).

Jeremy Chelot, CEO of YouFibre, said:

“It’s simply not good enough that the industry has failed to deliver One Touch Switch ahead of the deadline. The migration towards One Touch Switch is a major shift and not something that could happen overnight. However, as an industry, we have had years to solve this challenge and many ISPs have worked hard to ensure that they are compliant in time.

The goal for One Touch Switch was to make it easier for customers to switch to better broadband – something that would have benefited both British consumers and the market significantly. In failing to deliver this, the industry has failed customers and stunted the progress that altnets like YouFibre have worked so hard to achieve.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
12 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Steve says:

    Out of interest, roughly how long does the GPL process work on openreach. BT contract up next month and looking to move to Vodafone

    1. Avatar photo Tim says:

      Up to 10 working days, 14 days, sometimes infinity if Vodafone order your service as a NLP New Line Provide

  2. Avatar photo Andrew G says:

    The only surprising thing here is the implied surprise at Ofcom.

    Weren’t Ofcom monitoring progress? Did they not ask the right questions? Did they not ensure there was a clear, auditable programme, with key dates identified, proper reporting by those involved, and accountability for all milestones?

    I’ve been tangentially involved with setting up several similarly complex schemes in the energy sector, and those were multi-company, complex schemes involving multiple different regulators, with a special purpose company as the system designer and operator. The scheme I have in mind was delivered on time and on budget, so if Ofcom’s one touch switching has fallen on it’s face, then that’s down to poor planning and monitoring by Ofcom themselves.

    1. Avatar photo Iain says:

      Yeah. I don’t understand why it took the industry so long to establish TOTSCo. But equally, Ofcom should simply have mandated its establishment. You mention the energy sector: I’m not an expert, but smart metering has a similar neutral organisation at the centre.

      As you say, Ofcom have taken a hands off approach, as they often do. Now they feign surprise when things don’t work.

  3. Avatar photo Hamish says:

    We tried to contact TOTSCO for help and advice but got absolutely bizarre responses back. They have two presentations on their website alluding to a ‘small provider portal’ which would be set-up for small providers to avoid the complexity of full API integration. When I asked them when that would be ready, they had no idea what I was talking about – and asked me where did I see the presentations!!! A complete shambles. Tech Mahindra provide many of BT’s systems – and they are painfully slow to resolve issues and the systems and poorly designed and riddled with bugs. I would be amazed if this is live a year from now.

  4. Avatar photo Rob says:

    My fixed price contract with virgin media ends September 2024

    I wander if faster switching will be ready then

  5. Avatar photo Lance the Boil says:

    Yet another failure by OFCOM (not the ‘industry’) to add to their catalogue of failures alongside its consistent partiality towards the monopoly player in the industry. These timescales were never going to work – mind-numbingly obvious to even the most basic observer yet OFCOM is caught unaware and is lashing out.

    OFCOM well past its shelf life and should be abolished and replaced with something that resembles a base level of competency and independence.

  6. Avatar photo Lee says:

    Ofcom we’re told throughout the consultation, with characteristic British understatement, that an April 2023 deadline was “ambitious”. This is a mess entirely of their own making caused by an unwillingness to listen to expertise, engage with industry concerns, and show any flexibility as soon as it became clear that “ambitious” clearly meant “impossible”.

  7. Avatar photo Wrangler says:

    Another OFCom failure.

    Expecting competing networks to implement a common platform illustrates how disconnected they are from the industry they are charged with regulating. It is easy to sit in an ivory tower, make decrees and then expect miracles to happen. As the saying goes if you want something doing – do it yourself. They should have established TOTSCo and they should have built the ‘Hub’ and then handed it over to a not-for-profit to run.

    It’s all good and well bleating about the negative impact of this on the consumer – but what are they actually doing to protect the consumer? Writing fancy documents and not following through on half baked ideas.

    Shame on you OFCom!

  8. Avatar photo Andrew G says:

    If Cristina Luna-Esteban, wants to protect consumers, she needs to stop trying to blame others for about this self-inflicted mess with TOTSCo, get out of the office, speak to consumers, see how they’re benefiting from the 18-24 month minimum term contracts that Ofcom foolishly permit, and the now common practice of inflation plus pricing that customers cannot challenge, and the practice of applying inflation plus increases to the undiscounted price so that customers can see double the announced inflation plus rate. Not to mention dismal standards of customer service that Ofcom measure but do nothing about.

    Somebody at Ofcom is perhaps reading this, so open question, why are Ofcom so useless?

  9. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

    why are they going to use an Indian company? Have we not got any British companies that can do this?
    Indian or flipping Chinese, I suppose they are cheap.

  10. Avatar photo HullLad says:

    It’s an absolutely farcical situation, as anyone who is involved with TOTSCo or Ofcom in this matter will be aware.

    It’s turned into nothing but political posturing (by CPs claiming they’re ‘ready’, by Ofcom pretending this is a big ‘surprise’, and by TOTSCo pretending they’ll be ready for August)

    For something so complex, it requires co-operation, and not the ridiculous finger pointing and empty ‘enforcement’ programmes that do nothing but waste time.

    Work with TOTSCo; reset the delivery date; then fine whoever isn’t compliant.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5543)
  2. BT (3518)
  3. Politics (2543)
  4. Openreach (2301)
  5. Business (2268)
  6. Building Digital UK (2248)
  7. FTTC (2046)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1979)
  9. Statistics (1790)
  10. 4G (1670)
  11. Virgin Media (1625)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1467)
  13. Fibre Optic (1396)
  14. Wireless Internet (1393)
  15. FTTH (1382)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon