Ofcom Tells UK Telecoms Adjudicator to Help Fix OTS Broadband ISP Switching
The UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has called on the Telecoms Adjudicator (OTA) to help fix some of the remaining problems (i.e. the matching process) with the new One Touch Switching (OTS) system, which aims to make it easier for consumers to change broadband ISPs, and the related processes adopted by the One Touch Switching Company (TOTSCo).
Just to recap. The long-awaited introduction of OTS, which has faced many delays but aims to make it both quicker and easier for consumers to switch between broadband and phone providers on physically separate UK networks (e.g. migrating from a CityFibre based ISP to Virgin Media etc.), was finally introduced on 12th September 2024.
However, the launch also acknowledged that TOTSCo’s industry-led messaging platform still needed to improve the success rate of its “matching process” (i.e. ensuring that customer switches are correctly verified and migrated between providers), which caused Ofcom to temporarily retain the old migration process (Notification of Transfer / NoT+) – until 24th October 2024 – to act as a fallback for any OTS failures.
Advertisement
Ofcom has now written a new open letter to the OTA, which confirms how they would like the adjudicator to work with ISPs and other relevant stakeholders to “coordinate and facilitate industry effort on matching improvement in the run up to … the end of the six-week transition period.” This work will include the following.
OTA’s Required Work on OTS
• investigating the implementation of industry best practice and identifying causes of matching failure;
• scrutinising the matching approach for both losing and gaining journeys of providers to improve all matching rates; and
• producing a report of key observations and recommendations that can be implemented by communications providers, including as appropriate by amendment to industry best practice.
The OTA will now be expected “urgently to survey and meet with stakeholders who have been closely involved with recent matching review activities” and any insights must then be shared with the full community. Ofcom’s Director of Telecoms Consumer Protection, Cristina Luna-Esteban, added that they “expect providers to cooperate promptly, openly and positively with the OTA2 in this matter to ensure that OTS can be fully adopted with the greatest urgency, and by the planned withdrawal of NoT+.”
For its part, TOTSCo recently reported that, during the first week of OTS, they’d seen over 40 brands (e.g. ISPs like BT, CommunityFibre etc.) place some 26,000 OTS switch orders, albeit with only 3,500 successful completions. Currently, 251 brands are listed in the live directory, of which most are using a Full Management Managed Access Provider (MAP) to engage with TOTSCo. Clearly early adoption is still a bit of a work-in-progress, and you can find the latest stats below.
“While we are all delighted with this strong start, we recognise that significant work remains for the entire industry to achieve 100% of switches processed using OTS. Two key areas of focus are improving match success rates and addressing the remaining CP-side system defects. We are actively supporting industry in their performance-improvement initiatives,” said TOTSCo’s CEO, Paul Bradbury, last week.
Advertisement
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and Linkedin.
« Broadband Forum Seeks More Energy Efficient Full Fibre Networks
Advertisement
Leave a Reply
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.
NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Latest UK ISP News
- FTTP (5916)
- BT (3618)
- Politics (2679)
- Business (2394)
- Openreach (2387)
- Building Digital UK (2312)
- Mobile Broadband (2099)
- FTTC (2074)
- Statistics (1871)
- 4G (1771)
- Virgin Media (1724)
- Ofcom Regulation (1554)
- Fibre Optic (1455)
- Wireless Internet (1445)
- FTTH (1384)
I guarantee this won’t help. Too many cooks.
Or in this case, too many kitchens full of non-cooks, all trying to proceduralise “cooking”.
Indeed. They could of sent this to a UK based dev team and had it working successfully within months.
That’s unlikely. It’s not one system that needs developing. Every ISP taking part will have to do development and testing on their own systems.
“26,000 OTS switch orders, albeit with only 3,500 successful”
I wonder if some ISPs are looking for a match early on in order journey, before customer has really decided to move Vs just looking at pricing and install availability?
That’s a damming stat. My understanding is that two of the “big boys” matching still isn’t working so I think it’s just these guys responsible for most of them
So it’s currently operating at 30% success, and they are expecting to get it close to 100% with a month?
Good luck with that…
My calculator says just over 13% but are all of the remaining 86%+ pending or are there some failures hiding in there, If so, how many?
Admittedly Billy, I only looked at the last two data points to get a high level view and avoid the impact of earlier processing errors.
None of these stats give me any confidence that this is anywhere close to 100% success. Quoting 40 different brands doesn’t really mean much in isolation, we need to know the size of the market.
Unless OTA are well experienced in Lean Six Sigma approaches or similar (and in my experience they are not) I can’t see how this is going to help, unfortunately.
I’ll give TalkTalk one grudging positive point – OTS or not they certainly didn’t stop me moving away from them, or muck it up! Was dumped on them from Shell, interestingly since I know TT always provided the backbone to Shell, the minute we switched CS was terrible and DNS kept failing very frequently sometimes for hours at a time. An attempt to upgrade to g.fast thankfully failed (clueless CS had no idea what I was asking for, and the upgrade portal wasn’t working for ex-Shell customers, probably still isn’t). Now happily with Sky. Suspect it’s so good as I am likely the only person on the g.fast pod in our area though…
Hi @call_me_dave, was the switch to Sky done through OTS? We’d heard there are problems selecting TalkTalk as the losing provider for those who’d been with Shell.