Posted: 23rd Aug, 2011 By: MarkJ
Ofcom's
Initial Obligations Code of Practice for tackling UK based
internet copyright infringement (piracy) by broadband ISP customers, which is a significant part of the controversial 2010
Digital Economy Act (DEA), still hasn't been notified to the European Commission (EC) for approval.
Earlier this year the UK governments
Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) was forced to admit that its tough new measures would not be implemented until
spring 2012 at the earliest (
here) and any new delays could push that timetable back even further.
Since then Ofcom has ruled that the DEA's provisions for website blocking "
as they stand would not be effective" (
here), while TalkTalk and BT have also been granted a second chance with "
permission to appeal and expedition" against the findings of an initially flopped
Judicial Review of the act (
here).
Separately a Working Group for the
Liberal Democrat party plan to use their forthcoming Autumn Conference in Birmingham (17 to 21 September 2011) to vote on a new proposal that could see
all or part of the DEA being repealed or at least weakened (
Working Group Proposal .PDF). Adoption of such a proposal would cause friction as the LibDem's are a part of the current coalition government alongside
Conservative party ministers.
The LibDem Working Group ProposalsWe advocate a shift in focus towards what can be done to enable and help British creative industries to grow. We hope to refocus policy towards the value that can be brought to industry through balanced legislation and support. We particularly emphasise the need to break away from the negative assumptions that winning a complete victory against piracy is possible, or that it is the silver bullet that will safeguard UK creative industries for the coming years.
OPTION A
Given this emphasis on growth and balanced legislation, we recommend the repeal of sections 3-18 of the Digital Economy Act, which relate to copyright infringement. Good legislation is built upon a robust evidential framework and a clear democratic mandate, neither of which were secured in this case. The ultimate result has been a deeply flawed and unworkable Act which stands only as the main emblem of a misguided, outdated and negative approach.
OPTION B
The Digital Economy Act contains anti-piracy measures which were rushed through Parliament with insufficient consultation, and there are serious question marks over their workability. We recommend the repeal of sections 17 and 18 of the Act and a fundamental re-think about the desirability and practicality of site blocking. Sections 9-16 should not be commenced until the government can demonstrate that the measures would be necessary and effective, and assent had been given through a vote of both Houses.
We would set up an independent review of the true impact of file-sharing on the creative industries. In the evidence we have heard from witnesses, it has been clear throughout that arguments are being made, on all sides of the debate, from an insufficient evidence base. What is needed is a more detailed analysis of the relationship between piracy and the creative industries; there have even been some studies which suggested that file sharing may result in increased sales in certain circumstances.
Any subsequent proposal for legislation in this area should be considered in the light of this evidence, and should only be approved if it can be shown to be necessary, effective, and proportionate, and compatible with articles 8 and 10 of the ECHR (rights to private and family life, and freedom of expression).
On top of all that a number of recent court cases (
example) have cast serious and fundamental doubt over the reliability of related IP address based evidence, which at best (when it's not incorrect) can only identify the connection owner. This could conceivably lead to
innocent people and businesses being targeted and possibly even disconnected ("
suspended") from their internet access.
Crucially James Firth's
Slightly Right of Centre blog was able to confirm yesterday that the UK government had notified its related
Cost Sharing Order to the European Commission (EC) on 8th August. However Ofcom's Initial Obligations Code, which covers the
copyright infringement notification (ISP warning) letters and appeals processes for broadband providers, was nowhere to be seen.
The EC's approval process takes around
3-months to complete before the UK parliament is able to vote, which could potentially push implementation of the act back to next summer. The UK government could still conceivably meet a late spring deadline but only if they
bulldozed their way forward.
Separately Rights Holders, ISPs and the government are still attempting to establish a new
Voluntary Code of Practice for blocking any internet website that is deemed to "
facilitate" piracy (
here). More discussions have been taking place this month and we expect the final proposal to be watered down with some concessions for ISPs and public services. So far nothing has been agreed.