Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 

Ofcom Update Guidance on Power Backup and Resilience in UK Mobile Networks

Tuesday, Jun 16th, 2026 (2:22 pm) - Score 1,920
Mobile-mast-and-man-using-smartphone-by-CoPilot-for-MJ-on-190624

The UK telecoms and internet content regulator, Ofcom, has published a revised guidance document on network resilience, which was first published in 2024 (here) to give broadband, mobile and other digital network providers greater clarity on how they can “reduce the risk of network outages“. The new update clarifies their stance on power backup for mobile cell / mast sites.

Communications providers in the UK currently have a legal duty to identify, prepare for and reduce the risk of anything that compromises the availability, performance or functionality of their networks. The original guidance was thus intended to provide public network operators with greater clarity on how they could comply with their duties for security and resilience.

NOTE: The legal duties for all this flow from the recently amended Communications Act 2003, supplemented by the Electronic Communications (Security Measures) Regulations 2022 (summary).

The hope is that this would serve to reduce the chances of serious and protracted network outages occurring, or at least make them quicker to resolve. But modern networks are complex beasts that can fail due to all sorts of reasons (it’s often the ones you don’t foresee or expect that bite the hardest). In addition, the 2024 guidance left open the question of precisely what measures mobile operators should take to mitigate against the risks of power outages.

Advertisement

The specific issue of improving power backup for Radio Access Networks (RAN) is not an easy one to resolve, with a number of UK mobile operators being known to have balked at the potential costs of deploying national battery backup (here and here); costs that could potentially work their way into higher retail prices for consumers.

Nevertheless, Ofcom has today published a 2026 revision of their Network and Service Resilience Guidance for Communications Providers (PDF), which among other tweaks now includes some clarifications on the regulators “expectations for mobile network operators’ backup power arrangements in the RAN“.

ISPreview had to do a bit of a before vs after comparison to find some of the changes (they weren’t clearly signposted), but this bit of new text below did stick out. Back in 2024 the same section was largely blank, pending the need for more studies, which have since taken place.

Power backup in mobile RAN sites

In the case of mobile cell sites, in order to meet their duties, including under Regulation 3 to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the network is designed and constructed in a manner which reduces the risks of security compromises occurring, we expect MNOs to take robust measures to manage and mitigate against the risks of power outages and support continued communications services during power outages and surges which might reasonably be expected to occur. The measures we expect for mobile cell sites include the following parts of this guidance:

• our expectation that all communications providers maintain an ongoing programme of risk assessment and to make plans and investments commensurate with the identified risks, taking into account both the likelihood of events and the impact of their occurrence (3.2), which could include considering communities that may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of a power failure in the mobile RAN.

• on access sites and equipment where a significant number of customers’ last-mile connections are aggregated, resilience of the equipment and all key dependencies should be considered in the site and equipment design (see section 1.3.4). Where possible, communications providers should seek to eliminate loss of key dependencies, including mains power and network timing/synchronisation, for a significant period of time bearing in mind that citizens depend on the access network for access to emergency services (4.2.1).

We should point out that mobile operators have, in the background, been busy looking at this problem and making changes where viable. For example, last year saw Vodafone kick-off a new “Enhanced Power” initiative (here), which will work to boost resilience and extend power backup time at around 10,000 key mobile sites across Europe and Africa using a mix of AI and other technologies (specific plans for the UK were not disclosed).

Advertisement

Ofcom’s latest tweaks to this guidance seem to avoid being too prescriptive with their expectations, but the changes do still seem designed to give mobile operators more clarity and a bit of a nudge to take some greater action.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
8 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo htmm says:

    I read this as “no battery backup is required except in rare, exceptional circumstances”.

    I don’t think it is feasible to require battery backup everywhere immediately, but I would like to see this as a requirement in new frequency auctions.

  2. Avatar photo Charllie-UK says:

    Ofcom, like a lot of Regulators, of former Public utilities is like a toothless tiger. We face an Energy crisis, with a possibility off extended Power cuts. aand Ofcom is politely asking Mobile companies to assess what they already have ??. They seem to be, completely divorced from the reality, of the situation on the ground. The time for action on this issue, was a long time ago, as usual Ofcom are playing catchup with our Essential communication providers. It doesn’t inspire confidence…

    1. Avatar photo 84.08khz says:

      We don’t face an energy crisis with a possibility of extended power cuts.

      Where on earth did you get that nonsense from?

    2. Avatar photo Rik says:

      OFGEM are the ones you should be angry at for their measures which, in my opinion are anti consumer. They brought in the price cap and set it to protect the providers, providers who see the cap as a target rather than a limit but OFGEM see it as a great thing to encourage switching. I’d rather live in a world where I don’t have to go through the BS of switching all the time and just be given a fair price.

  3. Avatar photo John Geddes says:

    Ofcom tell those losing exchange-powered landlines that they don’t need battery backup if they have a usable mobile signal, whilst admitting that they don’t know how many mobile sites would last even 5 minutes in the event of an outage. And now seem to be confirming that they aren’t terribly bothered either way.

  4. Avatar photo ifuhaveto says:

    If the national grid’s power wasn’t being diverted to create the stupendous images that now accompany all ISPreview’s articles maybe we wouldn’t need so much battery backup?

    1. Avatar photo Carl says:

      You could blame Google discover and it’s users for that. If you don’t include a large unique image, even a useless one, you’re unlikely to appear in discover and on assumes Google believes users of discover want these too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £22.99
145Mbps
Gift: £160 Reward Card
BT UK ISP Logo
BT £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: £130 BT Reward Card
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £24.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
giffgaff UK ISP Logo
giffgaff £14.00
Contract: 18 Months
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £15.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £21.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
New Forum Topics
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Grain Connect UK ISP Logo
250Mbps
Gift: None
Zzoomm UK ISP Logo
Zzoomm £21.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact