Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Ofcom Review Sees BT’s UK Rivals Demand Cable Duct and Fibre Access

Tuesday, September 9th, 2014 (8:13 am) - Score 2,625

The UK communications regulator, Ofcom, has published the first responses to its latest Business Connectivity Market Review 2016 (BCMR2016) consultation and perhaps unsurprisingly it finds rivals including Vodafone, BSkyB (Sky Broadband), TalkTalk and Virgin Media all demanding greater access to BT’s cable ducts, dark fibre and leased lines.

It seems like only yesterday (2012) that Ofcom posted the outcome of its last Business Connectivity Review, which investigated the retail provision of leased lines and the wholesale provision of terminating segments and trunk segments in the United Kingdom’s £2bn market for business telecoms (here and here).

The 2012 review made a number of changes, not least with the decision to lower BT’s prices for 1Gbps+ lines outside of the London area and a rejection of the calls by rivals for so-called “passive remedies” (i.e. forcing BT to offer access to its cable ducts, poles or dark fibre lines). At the time Ofcom said that, “We consider that less intrusive remedies are likely to achieve similar benefits for consumers, while passive remedies would carry significant risks of worse outcomes, both for consumers and for effective competition, including adding costs and encouraging inefficient entry“.

But the new review intends to reconsider whether, on the presumption that Ofcom’s finds BT holding Significant Market Power (SMP) again, there is a case for Passive Remedies in wholesale leased lines markets. Aside from opening up access to Dark Fibre (i.e. fibre optic cables that have been laid, but which are not yet fully utilised – ‘future capacity’), Ofcom will also consider expanding BT’s Physical Infrastructure Access (PIA) product for cable ducts and poles for business use (currently it’s limited to residential) and wavelength unbundling of fibre optic lines (allows ISPs to offer differentiated services via a single piece of fibre).

Ofcom BCMR2016 Statement

One particular aspect that we intend to consider is the impact that passive remedies might have on BT’s common cost recovery. It is an important principle of price cap regulation that BT should have the opportunity, on a forward-looking basis, to recover its efficiently incurred costs including its common costs. One implication is that, if common costs cannot, or can no longer, be recovered from one set of services, we might need to allow BT to recover a greater share of common costs through charges for other services to allow cost recovery overall.”

As expected the first published responses to Ofcom’s new review appear to largely support the call for more Passive Remedies, although BT has unsurprisingly rejected these demands as “unnecessary, intrusive and bad for customers“.

BT also wants “further geographic deregulation in London and other metro areas” to reflect the markets “strong competition“, as well as more favourable charge controls and “an appropriate ‘end of life’ framework for legacy services, allowing them to decline naturally with no artificial extension of their life through regulation“.

Elsewhere BSkyB (Sky Broadband) makes the familiar point that BT’s lucrative leased line income may act as a disincentive for the operator to invest in rolling-out affordable superfast broadband (FTTC/P) technologies to business dominated areas, which Sky suggests could be solved by granting rivals access to the suggested Passive Remedies. On the other hand BDUK’s national target is perhaps already nudging BT to deploy FTTC/P into many more business areas than can currently be served.

BCMR 2016 Responses (ISPreview Selection)

* BT
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/British_Telecommunications_PLC.pdf

* Openreach (BT)
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/Openreach.pdf

* BSkyB
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/BSKYB.pdf

* KCOM
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/KCOM_Group.pdf

* Talk Talk
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/TalkTalk_Group.pdf

* VirginMedia
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/Virgin_Media.pdf

* Vodafone
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/business-connectivity-market-review/responses/Vodafone.pdf

It’s important to reflect, just because this is a “business connectivity” review, that doesn’t mean to say it wouldn’t have a potentially profound impact upon how much domestic consumers pay for their services. At some point the data traffic for almost everybody, from mobile operators to fixed line home broadband ISPs, is likely to pass over part of BT’s infrastructure and thus setting regulation here can directly affect the service you receive.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
8 Responses
  1. Avatar No Clue says:

    BT and Ofcom are only delaying the inevitable Its how LLU started all over again, pressure from the competition wanting a better product grows until Ofcom and BT have to finally cave. The sooner it happens for fibre related products and there is true competition the better for the customer.

  2. Avatar MikeW says:

    If @NFA is right about 24 fibres to each BDUK cab, then the request for access to dark fibre would become interesting…

    1. Avatar Gadget says:

      OTOH if it just the size of the cable to the node then you either need spine capacity back to the exchange (or just outside it) or work out a way of getting somewhere other than the exchange where there will not be an existing fibre route ‘cos the exchange is where the existing fibre route to)

  3. Avatar Chris says:

    Why is it always BT that has to share its ducts and Virgin Media don’t have to? Always found it silly – Whether they have significant marketing power or not, they should be made to share theirs too.

    Agree with making BT share their ducts which have been as a result of public funding though.

    1. Avatar DTMark says:

      “they should be made to share theirs”

      Should Tesco be made to feed the poor for free because those people are going hungry, and Tesco have got the food?

      Should you be forced to house a stranger because they have nowhere to live, and you have a spare room?

      I can understand that the position with regard to BT is that it is operated as a regulated utility which only exists in its present format because the taxpayer bought and set up all the equipment.

      To mandate that any private institution or property/rights-holder should be forced to share their investments and offerings with other people (think BT’s demand for Sky to wholesale sports to them – why on earth should they) is a very dangerous path.

    2. Mark Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      Now don’t go giving the Government new “ideas” to save money Mark :).

    3. Avatar FibreFred says:

      “which only exists in its present format because the taxpayer bought and set up all the equipment.”

      Which is complete an utter nonsense of course.

      Poles, ducts, copper and exchanges where bought by BT sure, but that doesn’t complete today’s network 🙂 what was bough/sold doesn’t resemble what is today

  4. Avatar TheManStan says:

    @Chris

    Won’t those ducts bought when BT went public?

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Onestream £19.99 (*27.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £21.00 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £21.99 (*36.52)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
  • NOW TV £22.00 (*40.00)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2898)
  2. BT (2822)
  3. FTTC (1811)
  4. Building Digital UK (1770)
  5. Politics (1708)
  6. Openreach (1663)
  7. Business (1489)
  8. FTTH (1343)
  9. Mobile Broadband (1279)
  10. Statistics (1271)
  11. 4G (1102)
  12. Fibre Optic (1084)
  13. Wireless Internet (1047)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1042)
  15. Virgin Media (1034)
  16. EE (729)
  17. Vodafone (707)
  18. TalkTalk (689)
  19. Sky Broadband (685)
  20. 5G (567)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact