Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

UPD On Target – BDUK Bring Superfast Broadband to 3 Million UK Premises

Wednesday, August 12th, 2015 (12:02 am) - Score 843
uk region map

The Government’s £1.7bn (public funding) Broadband Delivery UK project, which is primarily working with BT to make fixed line superfast broadband (24Mbps+) services available to 95% of the United Kingdom by 2017/18, has confirmed that 3 million homes and businesses can now benefit from its effort.

The project was originally setup in 2010 to help premises in the final 30% of the United Kingdom to receive superfast broadband connectivity because the big commercial operators (e.g. BT and Virgin Media) tended to only be interested in upgrading the first 60-70%. Meanwhile areas beyond that were often considered “commercially unviable” due to their low populations sizes and or high deployment costs.

Due to this the first BDUK target was intended to make superfast broadband available to 90% of the UK by the end of 2015 (approximately 4.2 million additional premises passed), although that target has since slipped to “by 2016” (early 2016). Today’s results hint that the first target should be achieved, although the next 95% goal for the end of 2017 is less certain (BT has previously hinted that it could slip into 2018). Note: Going from 90% to 95% should benefit an extra 1 million+ premises.

A rough breakdown of the latest progress can be found below and we’ve added a more detailed summary of England’s various local authorities at the bottom. So far BDUK seems to be adding around 500,000 extra premises per quarter, which at the current rate would see them hit around 4 million by the end of 2015.

Country / Region Premises Reached by “Fibre Broadband” (BDUK Projects) – 31st July 2015
North East England 124,249
Yorkshire and the Humber 295,235
North West England 384,667
East Midlands 338,709
West Midlands 220,604
South East England 531,093
South West England 311,758
East of England 391,095
Scotland (Rest of Scotland) 309,225
Scotland (Highlands & Islands) 84,952
Wales 482,000
Northern Ireland 41,652

Naturally BT (Openreach) has scooped up the vast majority of related BDUK contracts, although there have been a few small exceptions in parts of certain counties, such as the Cotswolds Broadband scheme in West Oxfordshire, UKB Networks Ltd. (HKT) in Swindon and some deployments by Gigaclear in other counties.

Most of BT’s approach has been to improve coverage via their ‘up to’ 80Mbps capable Fibre-to-the-Cabinet (FTTC) technology, with a few pockets of ultrafast (330Mbps) Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP). BT are also trialling a number of other technologies that may play a future role, such as the VDSL based Fibre-to-the-Basement (FTTB), Fibre-to-the-Remote-Node (FTTrN), Wireless-to-the-Cabinet (WTTC) solutions.

It’s worth pointing out that BT has also recently announced plans to bring speeds of up to 500Mbps to “most homes” over the next decade by rolling out G.fast broadband technology, although initially this is expected to be focused more on their commercial footprint and not BDUK areas.

John Whittingdale MP, Culture Secretary, said:

Reaching three million properties is a huge achievement. Our rollout of superfast broadband is transforming lives up and down the country as every day thousands more homes and businesses are gaining access to superfast speeds.

It’s fantastic to see that the rollout of superfast broadband is now delivering for customers and for the taxpayer. The levels of people taking up superfast broadband in areas where we invested public money are beyond our expectations, and BT is now reimbursing the public purse to deliver further coverage across the UK. This now means that BT will be providing up to £129m cashback for some of the most hard to reach areas.”

Gavin Patterson, CEO of BT Group, added:

The UK is making great progress with fibre broadband. Twenty three million premises are covered by BT’s open access network, with three million of those enabled under the BDUK programme. Our Openreach engineers have worked tirelessly to connect some of the most remote parts of the UK, from the Shetlands and Hebrides to the moors of southwest England.

The public have responded by taking up fibre in large numbers, and that’s good news for those areas that haven’t been reached yet. It means additional funds are being released which will enable us to go even further at no extra cost to the taxpayer and earlier than expected.”

The Government are also spending £10m to pilot 7 projects that could help to improve connectivity for the final 5% (a mix of fixed wireless, satellite and fibre optic solutions), which is needed because even BT may struggle to reach many of those areas (the pilots should run until early 2016).

Once completed the Government will then need to assess the pilots in order to learn how much investment may be needed in order to fill the 5% gap and achieve 100% coverage, which is going to be a difficult challenge.

The Size of the Final 5% (BDUK Data)

The unserved areas vary significantly in terms of the density of premises:

* Approximately 20% of the unserved areas are likely to be in areas with greater than 2,000 premises per km2, however the majority of these are in cities where BDUK’s current approach is to stimulate the market through demand-side measures.

* Approximately 20% of the unserved areas are likely to be in areas with population density between 500 and 2,000 premises per km2; and

* Approximately 60% of the unserved areas are likely to be in areas with population density below 500 premises per km2.

Happily the Digital Economy Minister, Ed Vaizey MP, recently promised to make it “absolutely clear” where superfast broadband will be delivered in the future and he intends to publish a plan for reaching the final 5% “before the end of the year” (here), which may potentially be funded by a controversial new TAX on broadband ISPs (here).

Some reports have indicated that the Government will need to raise £500m in order to tackle the final 5% and a TAX (“levy“) would certainly go a long way towards that. In addition, the recent BBC TV Licence fee proposal suggests that another £100m or so could also be extracted from that for use by the broadband roll-out between 2017 and 2020.

Furthermore it was recently revealed that the clawback mechanism in BDUK’s contracts with BT, which can return some of the investment once take-up in related areas has reached above 20%, will deliver funding worth up to £129m to help further improve coverage (here). A large part of this is due to BT making a revised business case assumption of reaching 30% take-up.

On top of that some projects, such as the Rutland scheme, have demonstrated deployment related “savings” that might also be reflected in other areas (here). However it’s too early to say whether this will be mirrored by other projects and we’ll have to wait for the BDUK Phase 1 (90% target) contracts to fully complete before the national picture becomes clear.

Finally, the most remote 1-2% of rural areas may yet end up being stuck with a subsidy to cover the cost of installing restrictive Satellite connections (See Budget 2015), which is hardly ideal due to the platforms meagre data allowances, high rental costs and slow latency. But this may also be the only way that the Government can say they’ve met the 2Mbps for all Universal Service Commitment (USC) by 2016, which so often gets overlooked.

A breakdown of the latest progress can be found below, which excludes match funding from local authorities, the EU and BT’s own contributions. The premises passed figure only reflects those able to receive superfast speeds of greater than 24Mbps (Megabits) and today’s 3 million total comes from more recent data than the June 2015 data below.

bduk_broadband_performance_data_q2_2015

The headline figures above are cash based (i.e. when grants are made or budgets transferred). On an accruals basis (which matches costs incurred to the timing of delivery), cumulative BDUK expenditure to end-June 2015 has been estimated as £367,635,571 which would equate to 7,904 premises covered per £million of BDUK expenditure. Expenditure on an accruals basis is higher because work has been delivered in advance of payment.

Now here’s a useful breakdown of the latest premises passed figure for English Local Authorities, although it’s not entirely clear if this only reflects raw “fibre broadband” coverage rather than those able to receive the full 24Mbps+ speeds.

Region (England) Local Authorities Premises Reached by BDUK Fibre – July 2015
East Midlands Leicestershire 46,023
East Midlands Northants 54,497
East Midlands Nottingham 50,383
East Midlands Rutland 9,416
East Midlands Lincolnshire 115,474
East Midlands Derbyshire 62,916
East of England Cambridgeshire 83,032
East of England Essex 42,100
East of England Norfolk 169,072
East of England Suffolk 96,891
North East Durham 68,550
North East Newcastle 8,749
North East Northumberland 47,000
North West Cheshire 80,759
North West Cumbria 90,408
North West Greater Manchester 30,033
North West Lancs 133,789
North West Merseyside 49,678
South East Bedfordshire 23,878
South East Berkshire 19,190
South East Bucks & Herts 46,907
South East East Sussex 52,874
South East Hampshire 60,926
South East Isle of Wight 15,697
South East Kent 120,966
South East Oxfordshire 62,358
South East Surrey 81,040
South East West Sussex 47,257
South West England Devon & Somerset (CDS) 181,887
South West England Dorset, Bournemouth & Poole 54,386
South West England GWB (South Gloucestershire) 17,965
South West England GWB (Wiltshire) 57,520
West Midlands Black Country 422
West Midlands Coventry, Solihull & Warwickshire (CSW) 39,233
West Midlands Herefordshire & Gloucestershire 46,985
West Midlands Shropshire 43,334
West Midlands Staffordshire 54,767
West Midlands Worcestershire 35,883
Yorkshire and the Humber North Lincolnshire 31,703
Yorkshire and the Humber East Riding of Yorkshire 46,228
Yorkshire and the Humber North Yorkshire 152,381
Yorkshire and the Humber West Yorkshire 64,923

Leave a Comment
12 Responses
  1. Avatar Craski

    Similar questions for me on this one regarding calculation method for “Premises Reached by BDUK Fibre” and how that is verified.

    Anybody know if “premises reached” is defined as the properties which are “passed” by fibre enabled infrastructure, or those that can actually order a fibre based service.

    e.g. If BT claim an FTTC cabinet “passes” 250 properties but only 60 of those lines are capable of supporting any sort of VDSL based service (not just > superfast speed), which figure is used, the 60 or 250?

    • Avatar GNewton

      Have you tried a Freedom of Information request? Would be certainly interesting to find out.

    • @Craski – passed and capable of placing an order are the same. You can place an order for a low perfroming VDSL which is still better than you are currently receiving.

    • Avatar Craski

      @NGA for all

      They cant be the same.
      In the BT Wholesale datasets which Code Lookup is based on, my FFTC enabled cabinet “passes” 250 properties but my house and approximately 190 others on the same cabinet physically cannot order a fibre/VDSL based service, not even a crappy slow one.

    • @Craski that seems odd. Is you number range different to your neighbours?

    • Avatar Craski

      @NGA

      In another thread Mike has been running some scripts looking at the cabinet in question and while the numbers are not quite 60/190, they still show approximately half the cabinet cannot get VDSL.

    • Avatar TheFacts

      @NGA – for you to ask about number ranges on the same cabinet is interesting…

  2. Avatar TheFacts

    Where are all the critics of BDUK, gone very quiet recently?

    • Avatar Craski

      Maybe they are struggling to get online due to their 56k modems overheating in this sweltering British summer because they live more than a mile away from an FTTC cabinet?

    • It is August fortnight, and most of the criticism is not about BDUK but how BT is choosing to treat Government and its institutions. BT’s decisions to inflate its costs while setting targets low has little to do with BDUK. The ack of transparency remains appalling.
      At least the inflated costs are appearing as underspends, while the take-up is forcing a BT capital contribution.
      Scrutiny from three select Committees this autumn and the new state aid measure may also help keep the public funds visible.

    • Avatar Mark

      I don’t bother posting much because it’s all too annoying. My only choice for faster broadband is an insanely expensive leased line when I’d happily pay whatever the installation costs are of connecting my house to our FTTC cabinet.

    • Avatar TheFacts

      @NGA – what transparency are you looking for? To a) the counties and b) the general public. What other government contracts do and don’t provide the transparency you would like?

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £19.95 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Gift Card
  • Post Office £20.90 (*37.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £21.95
    Avg. Speed 63Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • SSE £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2622)
  2. FTTP (2416)
  3. FTTC (1713)
  4. Building Digital UK (1653)
  5. Politics (1519)
  6. Openreach (1491)
  7. Business (1306)
  8. FTTH (1203)
  9. Statistics (1143)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1107)
  11. Fibre Optic (1010)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (964)
  13. 4G (956)
  14. Wireless Internet (954)
  15. Virgin Media (914)
  16. EE (633)
  17. Sky Broadband (625)
  18. TalkTalk (609)
  19. Vodafone (579)
  20. 3G (433)
New Forum Topics
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact