Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Ofcom UK Fine EE £6.3m and Virgin Media £7m for Overcharging UPDATE

Friday, November 16th, 2018 (7:20 am) - Score 1,048
pound coin money new

Billing mistakes can be costly. The national UK telecoms regulator has today fined mobile operator EE and cable broadband ISP Virgin Media a combined total of £13.3m for overcharging customers (those on discounted deals) who wished to leave their contracts early. Overall nearly 500,000 customers were affected.

Some readers may recall that Ofcom has been busy investigating the implementation of Early Termination Charges (ETC) at both operators since last year. Most of the UK market’s largest telecoms providers will levy some form of ETC, which applies to customers who choose to exit their contract before the current term has come to an end (Virgin calls these Early Disconnection Fees).

Such charges should be covered by the regulator’s General Condition 9.3 (GC9.3) rule, which is designed to “ensure that the conditions which apply if you terminate your contract don’t disincentivise you from changing to a new provider, e.g. through excessive early termination charges.” The charges must also be made clear to customers.

Meanwhile section 62(1) of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA) similarly states that unfair terms in a consumer contract are not binding on the consumer (this means provisions within the contract itself).

What Happened?

Ofcom’s investigation found that both EE and Virgin Media had “failed to comply” with these rules. Firstly, the regulator noted that both companies had “failed to make sufficiently clear the charges customers would have to pay if they ended their contract early.

On top of that they found that around 400,000 EE mobile customers who ended their contracts early were “over-billed” (this occurred over a 6 year period – January 2012 to June 2018), and customers ended up over-paying up to £4.3 million. Essentially EE “mis-calculated” its early-exit charges for those affected based on the non-discounted monthly retail price (i.e. they paid a discounted monthly rate, but the ETCs were based on a different higher rate).

Overall Ofcom said EE’s customers were “collectively over-billed” by up to £13.5m in early exit charges, although some of these were subsequently waived by EE and hence why the above figure is much lower. Meanwhile almost 82,000 of Virgin Media’s broadband customers were similarly “overcharged” a total of just under £2.8 million (this occurred over a single year – September 2016 to August 2017).

Virgin’s mistake was similar to EE’s and it’s noted that some 6,800 of those affected were overcharged by more than £100! On top of that Virgin’s fine was pushed up slightly after they provided “incomplete information in response to a statutory information request.”

Gaucho Rasmussen, Ofcom’s Director of Investigations and Enforcement, said:

“EE and Virgin Media broke our rules by overcharging people who ended their contracts early. Those people were left out of pocket, and the charges amounted to millions of pounds.

That is unacceptable. These fines send a clear message to all phone and broadband firms that they must play by the rules, in the interests of their customers.”

In response EE has changed its terms, plans to conduct and in-depth review of its processes and systems, significantly reduced its ETCs and refunded just over £2.7m to the affected customers it has been able to identify, although this means up to £1.6m cannot be refunded.

Meanwhile Virgin Media has reimbursed or made donations to charity in respect of more than 99.8% of affected customers (aiming to do this for 100%), significantly reduced its ETCs (by an average of 30%, and up to 50% in some cases), updated their terms and they now apply an additional reduction to ETCs for those who end their contract after moving house (i.e. moving into an area where Virgin’s network is not present).

Virgin has also made changes to its procedures and contract terms for home movers.

Virgin’s Home Movers Changes

• Make it clearer in contract terms, on its website and in conversations with customers, that Virgin Media’s network does not cover the whole of the UK; and that, if a customer moves home to an area outside of its network, they may be liable to pay an early-exit charge;

• Promote 30-day rolling contracts as an alternative option for customers who are aware they may need to move house in the near future; and

• Update its training processes and customer service agents’ scripts and materials to ensure that customers who indicate they may need to move home are provided with correct information.

In addition, customers who move house within Virgin Media’s network, and retain its services, will no longer have to sign up to a new minimum-term contract to avoid paying early-exit charges. Instead, they can now continue their existing contract at their new address. But elsewhere Virgin is far from happy.

Tom Mockridge, CEO of Virgin Media, said:

“We profoundly disagree with Ofcom’s ruling. This decision and fine is not justified, proportionate or reasonable.

A small percentage of customers were charged an incorrect amount when they ended one or more of their services early and for that we are very sorry.

As soon as we became aware of the mistake we apologised and took swift action to put it right by paying refunds, with interest, to everyone affected. For those few people we could not locate, we have made an equivalent donation to charity. We also reviewed our internal processes and systems, and improved our customer communications to make sure that this does not happen again.

We wholeheartedly reject the claim by Ofcom that our ETC levels dissuaded customers from switching.

This unreasonable decision and excessive fine does not reflect the swift actions we took, the strong evidence we have presented, or our consistent, open and transparent cooperation with the regulator. We will be appealing Ofcom’s decision.”

The reference to a “small percentage” (1.5%) above is correct but this is perhaps one of the problems with big providers, which have a tendency to look at the numbers and forget that 82,000 people will have been affected and stressed by their mistake. On the other hand they do seem to have been bit particularly hard, especially when compared with the 400,000 affected by EE’s similar mistake.

Virgin will now appeal Ofcom’s decision in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT). Otherwise the move should hopefully act as a warning shot to any other operator that doesn’t understand the concept of setting ETCs at a level that is fair for their customers, especially those on a discounted package.

However in EE’s case today’s development comes roughly a year after they were fined £2.7m for overcharging 40,000 mobile customers (here); hopefully it isn’t becoming a trend.

UPDATE 11:10am:

A statement has arrived from EE and complaints handler firm Ombudsman Services.

A Spokesperson for EE told ISPreview.co.uk:

“We accept Ofcom’s findings and recognise that we have made a mistake. We apologise to customers with discounted tariffs who paid more than they should have when cancelling their contracts early. We’ve already refunded customers and changed the way we calculate early termination charges, and we will continue to focus on ensuring our policies are clear and fair for all customers.”

Matthew Vickers, CEO of Ombudsman Services, added:

“Good consumer protection relies on the regulator being able to gather intelligence from a range of sources.

As Ofcom has recognised today, complaints from consumers are one of the most important sources.

A joined-up approach involving the industry regulator, the ombudsman and consumer advice bodies strengthens consumer protection – ultimately increasing trust and confidence in key markets.

An example of where this works particularly well is in energy, where we as the single ombudsman for the sector work closely with Ofgem and Citizens Advice in a tripartite model based on collaboration and intelligence sharing.”

Delicious
Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he is also the founder of ISPreview since 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
6 Responses
  1. Web Dude

    Just out of interest, I wonder what 2% of turnover would be for either EE or Virgin, and whether they (and their shareholders) would sit up a bit straighter if that level of fine had been imposed, instead.

    I suspect the few million (while a lot to Joe Bloggs in the street) is only a gentle slap on the wrist for the major players (and there will be some critical views from shareholders about the fines and mishandling, but) nobody is going to feel it particularly hard, at board level, or even within senior management within these firms.

    Just my guess, but I could be wrong, of course…

  2. Franny hendry

    And what about the people that wanted to leave EE but we’re “put off” because of the charges????? We have all ended up paying way more to EE than we would have if given the chance to leave there contact(EE), tried to leave myself only to be told that I would have to pay the ‘full” 24 month contract to leave, that made me paying more in the long run had I got the chance to leave EE and go to a cheaper supplier.. Xx

    • Simon

      I did an upgrade 18 months in and was charged £511 to end my old contract – so I am calling up as I was on a SIM only!

    • Simon

      I am also glad they are going to encourage 30 day contracts – im about to call them and ask to be put on one as my contract is up – but they charge £10 a month more for 30 days only -so let’s see if they stiff me for it

      Don’t 12 month contracts go to 30 days anyway?

  3. joseph

    Oh no its more Ofcom logic.

    Fine the company that screwed more customers out of more money less than the other.

    I guess the lesson here if you are an ISP and you are going to screw people, screw them all, the more you do it the less you will be fined LOL

  4. S Wakeman

    It is an interesting concept to reduce a fine in exchange for cooperation and disclosure. This tactic is used when dealing with criminal law but the logic there is that the prosecution will gain something such as an admittance of guilt or more information.

    In cases such as this there isn’t a trial per se because it seems that Ofcom have already decided that there has been breach, so why treat the company with a light touch? Surely they are required, by law, to comply and conform with any and all investigations. Good behaviour at this stage is a bit late isn’t it? Refunding customers after you’ve ripped them off isn’t good behaviour, it is the legally and morally correct thing to do.

    I am baffled by this. Such small fines are, as stated, pretty inconsequential when looking at EE, which has revenue of over 1billion. It could actually pay for these companies to engage in poor practices and run the risk of being caught out as the potential gains far outweigh the paltry fines, tutting and finger waving that happens in response to these things. As stated, there will thousands of customers on top of the 80k who were not charged but were instead disincentivised to leave for fear of incurring a charge. EE kept hold of those customers undeservingly and what do they pay for that? Absolutely nothing.

    Like so many regulatory bodies, Ofcom is ineffective and toothless. Effectiveness should be measured based on instances of no. Compliance. These companies are not scared by the regulator when they should be. It shouldn’t be about administering fines, it should be about not having to because the businesses within the industry would not risk facing the consequences of not complying. Fat cats will always tell us peasants that loose regulation works best, and it does, if you’re a fat cat and want to make money however you like but all it really does is put the ball in their court and you end up with markets that are stacked heavily to the benefit of the few at the cost of the consumer. It’s pathetic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £18.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Code: CHRISTMAS18
  • Onestream £19.95 (*34.99)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.50
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Direct Save Telecom £22.95 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £23.00 (*25.00)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
Poll
*Javascript must be ON to vote*
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2290)
  2. FTTP (1755)
  3. FTTC (1521)
  4. Broadband Delivery UK (1491)
  5. Openreach (1234)
  6. Politics (1227)
  7. Business (1093)
  8. Statistics (965)
  9. Mobile Broadband (886)
  10. Fibre Optic (881)
  11. FTTH (819)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (813)
  13. Wireless Internet (807)
  14. 4G (768)
  15. Virgin Media (742)
  16. Sky Broadband (546)
  17. TalkTalk (525)
  18. EE (508)
  19. Vodafone (397)
  20. Security (371)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms  ,  Privacy and Cookie Policy  ,  Links  ,  Website Rules