The UK communications and media (broadband, mobile, TV etc.) regulator has today set out a range of new measures that are intended to tackle bundles of both mobile handsets and tariffs (airtime contracts) together, which often continue to charge consumers for the handset even once the minimum contract term has ended.
At present most mobile operators will offer consumers a choice of either taking a SIM-Only plan (i.e. you just pay for the text/data/calls or mobile broadband plan of your choice) or a bundle with a mobile handset (airtime plan). The advantage of a bundle is that it enables consumers to spread the cost of their handset and mobile plan across the contract term (12-24 months), which is particularly useful given how much some of the top-end Smartphones can cost (£1,000+).
Bundles like this tend to cost a lot and that becomes more of an issue if, at the end of your contract term, the operator keeps taking the same monthly payments as before (i.e. you’ve already paid off the cost of the handset but the operator is still asking you to pay for it). At this point a wise consumer would switch to a SIM-Only option or change plan / operator but not everybody does that.
Advertisement
Some mobile operators, such as O2, already offer ways to resolve this but others do not. Ofcom estimates that around 1.4 million UK consumers are out of their contract and still paying instalments towards a handset that has already been paid off (here). The regulator equates this to consumers paying £182 million a year more than they should.
Ofcom has thus been consulting upon ways to tackle this and today they’ve proposed several related measures. Sadly not all operators want to play ball.
Summary of the Key Changes
New transparency rules
Under the new EU rules, which must be implemented by the end of next year, mobile customers entering into a bundled contract will be told the cost of buying the handset and airtime separately. We want to introduce this for UK customers as quickly as possible, and will set out our plans in the coming months.
New contract rules
Mobile customers are increasingly turning to ‘split’ contracts – with separate contracts for the handset and airtime – so they can afford an expensive mobile phone in instalments (split contracts have risen from 4% in 2014 to 16% in 2018).
We are concerned that longer split contracts could make it harder for customers to switch, if they have to pay off their handset first. So today we have proposed a new rule to ban mobile operators from linking split contracts where the handset contract is longer than 24 months.
Reduced mobile bills
Several mobile operators have voluntarily committed to reduce customers’ bills by making several changes to how they handle airtime contracts. The only major mobile operator NOT to sign-up is Three UK, which “refused to apply any discount to its out-of-contract customers” and Ofcom thus fears they will “continue to overpay and will not receive similar protections if they stay on their current deal.”
* Virgin Mobile (Virgin Media) will move its out-of-contract customers to the equivalent 30-day SIM-only deal.
* Tesco Mobile will reduce the monthly charges of out-of-contract customers who are overpaying to the best available airtime tariff.
* O2 will reduce the monthly price of its out-of-contract customers to the equivalent 30-day SIM-only deal. This will apply to its direct customers only, but O2 will discuss options for customers who take out O2 contracts with third-party retailers.
* Vodafone and EE will reduce their prices for customers out of contract for more than three months. Both companies will confirm the level of this discount before the end of the year. We expect their discount to take into account the level of savings available if customers switched to a comparable SIM-only tariff.
Apparently all of these discounts will come into effect by February 2020 and that should complement Ofcom’s existing measures, such as the recently introduced Text-to-Switch (Auto-Switching) system (here) and their new end-of-contract notification service that’s due to go live on 15th February next year (here).
Lindsey Fussell, Ofcom’s Consumer Group Director, said:
“Our research reveals a complex mobile market, where not everyone is getting a fair deal.
So we’re introducing a range of measures to increase fairness for mobile customers, while ensuring we don’t leave existing customers worse off.
All the major mobile companies – except Three – will also be reducing bills for millions of customers who are past their initial contract period.”
In addition, Ofcom said they will launch a new “switching campaign” this autumn that will “highlight the benefits of switching mobile and broadband provider” (they kind of already do this a bit for broadband ISPs). Separately they’re continuing to review broadband pricing (e.g. loyalty penalty) and looking at how they could tweak the rules in order to better protect vulnerable consumers (we expect the outcome later in 2019).
Advertisement
Three like to claim they are consumer champions…!
In fairness to Three, they text you three months out, let you upgrade to a new phone at that time, the offer you to recontract at a lower cost on sim only on the same call. Done it many a time.
Unsure why they wouldn’t just sign up. They’re likely the most aggressive at contacting you at plan end.
Three added an RPI increase clause to my sim only contract just 4 months into the 12 month term. Download speed was dire in my area so I used the contract change as reason to terminate, but during the conversation they told me they had to add an annual RPI increase because it’s now an Ofcom requirement! (Blatant lie.)
They could have done the right thing and chosen to add the RPI clause but waive increases during the remainder of the minimum term, but no. They were greedy and wanted their 2.5% increase immediately.
To add insult to injury, the same plan was back on sale at the pre-RPI increase price a few weeks later.
Three are not consumer champions. I won’t have a contract with them again.
‘Make it right’, being Three’s shout for fairness and consumer satisfaction! Seems to have dissipated into a joke, or a distant memory. Or both.
Three let us know about the end of our contracts, wether it’s SMS, or a phone call. The end date is also in the My3 app. It is important that all Operators communicate this to customers but the customer needs to make themselves aware of the contract end date also & There are multiple ways to do it. But we all know that people can be lazy.
What needs to happen is customer loyalty.
I’m sick of mid contract price rises, only to find that NEW customers get the same package at the original price I paid.
This practice needs to stop.
We shouldn’t have to ring up to negotiate when we’ve already signed a contract. The only negotiation should bd at the end of the contract period and that should also be the only time that any increase is even mentioned!
Even then, they shouldn’t increase if they want to keep your custom.
Just contacted EE for a PAC code and was told that although my contract has ended I’ll still be charged the contract rate for the next 30 days. Only when I argued did they agree to credit that charge as long as I use the code within 28 days.
That was their policy until a few weeks ago, 30 days charge from termination date even if you waited until the PAC code was about to expire. It was at least openly stated in their terms and conditions, but still very mean of them.
They are no longer allowed to do that under the new Ofcom rules, and in my case earlier this month they didn’t.
It sounds like a call centre agent has forgotten about the new rules, but it’s also possible they were lying to make you think twice about leaving to earn themselves a retention commission. Worth reporting to Ofcom, they won’t take action over a single report but do monitor trends and this goes directly against the spirit of their new rules which are to remove barriers to switching.