The UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has revealed the outcome of the Telecoms Adjudicator‘s (OTA) recent review into the remaining problems (i.e. the matching process) with the new One Touch Switching (OTS) system, which was intended to make it easier for consumers to change broadband ISPs but is still somewhat of a work-in-progress.
At present, the OTS process is being implemented by both communications providers directly and a centralised messaging platform via the industry-led One Touch Switching Company (TOTSCo), which all providers need to use. But as previously reported (here), the success rate of the “matching process” (i.e. ensuring that customer switches are correctly verified and migrated between providers) is not as high as the regulator would like.
According to the latest switching data, the daily switch match success rate has risen from c.60% to around 63-64% over the past month (note: some failed switches will still get approved later, after corrections are made). In addition, daily switch orders recently reached peaks of c. 8,000 to 9,000 around the Black Friday weekend.
Advertisement
However, in case anybody has forgotten, Ofcom drafted in the OTA during late September 2024 to work with ISPs, TOTSCo and other relevant stakeholders to “coordinate and facilitate industry effort on matching improvement.”
The OTA has now reported its “initial findings” back to Ofcom, which has resulted in the regulator’s Director of Consumer Policy, Cristina Luna-Esteban, issuing a new open letter to say she remains “concerned that the OTS process needs improvement end to end“, while highlighting which areas need special attention.
Extract from Ofcom’s Letter to Industry
As a reminder, there are a number of regulatory requirements which are relevant to communications providers’ efficient and effective implementation of One Touch Switch. General Condition (GCs) C7.18 requires regulated providers to maintain a single process, One Touch Switch, for relevant switching customers in accordance with the GCs and “any applicable industry processes as agreed by the relevant industry forum”.
Further, the high-level switching requirement, GC C7.4, also requires that providers “maintain simple and efficient process” for switches, “cooperate in good faith and take all necessary steps within their control” to complete the switching process “in accordance with this Condition C7 and Condition B3 and any applicable industry agreed processes”; and “do not delay or abuse” the switching process.
GC C1.8 also requires regulated providers to “ensure that conditions or procedures for contract termination do not act as disincentives for relevant customers against changing their communications provider”.
The OTA2 has identified in their report a number of areas where improvements can and should be made by communications providers to secure improved rates of matching success for customers.
These recommendations include that CPs should:1. Review their solutions to ensure they are fully compliant with the OTS process, and appropriate Best Practice;
2. Analyse their live matching performance, in both gaining and losing journeys, and collaborate with as many other communications providers as possible to identify root causes and resolve them; and
3. Consider improving their monitoring, reporting and diagnostic capability to improve their ability to identify root causes of failure and fix them.
I have asked the OTA2 to continue their work in coordinating and facilitating cross-industry improvements to matching success. I therefore expect communications providers to urgently prioritise further work to secure improvements to their use of OTS both as losing and gaining providers and to cooperate positively with the OTA2 and other communications providers (in relation to matching improvements) to enable all customers to realise the full benefits of quicker, easier and more reliable switching.
Communication providers can and must do more to ensure that they are compliant with the GCs set out above, so that OTS can be used by all customers in a simple and easy way. Ofcom will therefore continue to monitor the implementation of OTS by individual providers closely, including through our enforcement programme, and will take further enforcement action if required.
We think it’s fair to say that the level of OTS implementation between different communication providers is still quite varied, which continues to cause some problems, particularly with smaller providers. For example, we’ve seen consumers being unable to switch their broadband and phone services because some ISPs still aren’t fully live on TOTSCo’s platform.
In other cases, we’ve had reports about certain providers refusing to match any switching requests (even when the info. is correct) and then failing to engage in a resolution. Most recently, some losing providers have also complained that certain gaining providers are failing to inform them when a switch has completed, which stops them from being able to verify that the customer has fully cancelled / left.
Advertisement
Everybody is aware that implementing something as complex as OTS was always going to be a bit of a bumpy ride, yet it’s important to keep sight of the fact that positive progress is being made. Even if some of those bumps might yet take a bit more effort to iron out.
UPDATE 3:35pm
Ofcom has also just published the OTA’s related Matching Review Summary (PDF).
Advertisement
There’s also an issue with customers moving from non-Openreach providers onto Openreach where the install is delayed for civils work but the old services still cease on time. Something which should have been foreseen and dealt with long before the system went live but wasn’t
The process that CPs were told to adopt meant that a customer’s service with their existing provider should not be ceased until the losing provider has received notification that the new service is live.
Broadband in Towcester is patchy as is TV & Radio
So when is the great Ofcom spin of OTS implementation actualy going to be implemented (100% working) rather than the ‘ptotype’ that many are suffering from?
As for OTA stats / SLA diktat, my migration is due to take 19 days (SLA stated as 12?) and as for the number port well GCP is only stating ‘maybe’, and upto 10wd after the BB switch if I call them when the fftp is ‘active’, so ~29 days and this is just openreach to openreach.
Seems the regulator needs regulating, particulalrly thoses at the top sanctioning the spin.
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
This is all down to the gaining providers lead times and how they manage the number porting process., OTS as a process can and does indeed support same day / next day switching if your new ISP has the infrastructure to deliver service that quickly.
From what I’ve seen there are some providers that are not raising the porting order until the broadband supply order has been confirmed, and others that won’t raise the port order until after the broadband service has been provided. There are costs that drive that reasoning, but the proposed OTS porting process that is under discussion within the industry currently will seek to eliminate those issues. But that could take another year to be implimented fully.