New Cisco Systems funded research from the University of Oxford's Said Business School has revealed that broadband speeds in the UK, Spain, Australia and Italy are lower than what many modern web applications (e.g. online video, file sharing etc.) would require for a good online experience. The study did not factor in other crucial elements, such as customer support quality, broadband penetration, costs and usage levels.

By contrast Japan topped the world with its broadband performance, while Sweden and the Netherlands dominated Europe's strongest results. To reach these conclusions the study reportedly took a total of 8 million "measurements’" using somewhat anecdotal results from Speedtest.net. The score was produced by combining download speed, upload speed and latency (server response time) performance:


The results come hot on the heels of a new report from the Broadband Stakeholder Group (BSG) earlier this week, which predicted that it could cost between £5.1bn and £28.8bn to bring next generation broadband services to the whole country (news). Francesco Caio, the former CEO of Cable & Wireless, is also expected to publish his government review into Britain's broadband infrastructure during this autumn.


What’s less clear is precisely which methodology the study used to determine whether a given average result would or would not be adequate enough to run such services, since there is no industry standard. Never the less, the UK often falls further down the charts when it comes to overall average speeds versus the rest of the world.

Hopefully BT’s recent £1.5bn commitment to bring up to 100Mbps fibre optic broadband services to approximately 10 million homes by 2012, combined with Virgin Media’s 50 to 100Mbps drive, will go some way to restoring the country’s status. Mind you, that’s provided customers can actually receive a good speed from their ISP, regardless of the infrastructure in place.