I've been a customer with Aquiss for a while now, and recently noticed a significant change in their network routing. They’ve updated their IP ranges under their own ASN (215066), but the BGP routing now goes through VeloxServ Communications Ltd as the sole upstream ASN. Unfortunately, this setup has introduced some major peering and performance issues.

Tracing routes has shown that traffic has to take an extra hop through VeloxServ Communications Ltd, which isn't ideal. VeloxServ's peering, while functional, falls short compared to other ISPs of a similar size or reputation. They primarily peer with PCCW, Zayo, and Hurricane Electric, which doesn’t quite compare to the options other providers are using. For instance, if we look at Andrew & Arnold, smaller providers like Watchfront, or Spitfire, they’re benefiting from more direct peering relationships with major networks like NTT, Cogent, Level 3, Pulsant, HE, COLT, Arelion, IP-MAX, UPIX, and even Telstra in some cases.

Aquiss could benefit from improving their routing strategy and peering partnerships to be more in line with what’s available through other similar-sized providers. Without direct access to better-connected ASNs, Aquiss customers are left with subpar routing paths and, potentially, lower performance. It’s a disappointing shift, and one that current or prospective customers should consider.