Posted: 25th Mar, 2011 By: MarkJ


The
Ewhurst and Surrey Hills Broadband (ESHB) campaign, which was recently promised a
grant worth £150,000 by the
South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) to help improve the areas broadband service, has accused BT of conspiring to have its project "
crushed".
SEEDA initially granted the money to ESHB's campaign, which has been running since 2007, on 14th January 2011 and the final contract was due to be signed in February 2011. However, shortly before any signature could happen, SEEDA made the unexpected decision to withhold the grant until another announcement occurred that could "
affect the outcome".
Supporters of the ESHB scheme believe that BT, which allegedly failed to provide a valid quotation during the tender process, has now told SEEDA and the
Surrey County Council that it will be upgrading Cranleigh and Ewhurst with 'up to' 40Mbps capable
Fibre-to-the-Cabinet ( FTTC ) technology and therefore there is no need for the grant to be paid.
A Spokesman for ESHB told ISPreview.co.uk:
"In theory, this is good news for both Cranleigh and Ewhurst because public money need not be spent on the project. However, BT has a history of saying that it will upgrade areas as soon as local groups show signs of doing the work themselves, thus blocking projects - and then BT not doing or postponing the work.
Could this be yet another example of a spoiling tactic simply to block the competition with a diminished or downgraded facility solution?"
Indeed BT attempted to do something similar in the small rural village of
Erbistock (
Wrexham,
Wales) last year, when it unexpectedly moved to undercut Rutland Telecom's (RT) £50k bid to install superfast broadband in the area (
here). However, residents ultimately picked RT's solution because BT could only promise a moderate improvement to existing service quality.
The BT solution (FTTC) being proposed for
Cranleigh and
Ewhurst is far more capable, though the ESHB campaign has doubts about its ability to deliver. A particular challenge for Ewhurst results from the long lines from the cabinet to the homes of those living in the
Surrey Hills, which BT acknowledge are of poor broadband quality. It's likely that these will still experience "
extremely slow broadband speed[s]", even under FTTC.
To meet this challenge, the Ewhurst group wanted to use the promised grant for a fully flexible enhanced solution from its chosen contractor,
Vtesse Networks ( Vtesse Broadband ). This would have included techniques to improve the very poor lines and the installation of some true
Fibre-to-the-Premises ( FTTP ).
A Spokesman for ESHB added:
"By contrast, the BT cabinets will have no such facilities, thus condemning the outlying homes irrevocably to exclusion for generations to come. EHSB has put in a great deal of time and energy into this project and now see it going down the drain through devious tactics.
Should the grant not be forthcoming to Ewhurst then Surrey must be obliged to ensure that BT provide a full facility universal service throughout the Ewhurst area within a reasonable time-scale and without the slippages that have occurred in other areas such as Haslemere and Brookwood.
If the ‘Big Society’ is to work and innovative schemes such as that of ESHB are to succeed, then the dead hand of big business and county authorities must be removed and local initiatives allowed to thrive."
The campaign also claims that
BT confirmed in writing last March that it had no such plans for the area. Meanwhile BT has yet to make an official announcement about its plans, although a recent article in
Get Surrey appeared to all but confirm an
upgrade by March 2012.
It's understood from ESHB that the BT announcement itself was due last week, but never materialised, and is now anticipated next week "
adding two more months delay". However, when we asked, BT chose not to be drawn into commenting on the wider issues at play.
A BT Spokeswoman told ISPreview.co.uk:
"We've not announced any plans for the area to date.
We are expecting to announce the next set of locations to receive fibre soon but are not in a position to comment on plans for any specific exchanges until the next set of exchanges have been formally announced to industry."
The ESHB campaign fears that SEEDA may be convinced by BT to announce their decision
without any technical comparison or means of monitoring BT's potentially undefined offer in an undefined timescale.
In related news the Government announced last year that all RDAs, including SEEDA, would close by April 2012.