Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

BT Sends Patent Lawyers After PC Video Gaming Giant Valve (STEAM)

Thursday, Sep 1st, 2016 (9:04 am) - Score 2,212

BT appears to be suing online PC video game and digital distribution giant Valve Corporation because its popular STEAM platform is alleged to “incorporate technologies invented by BT” (e.g. cloud features like Valve’s Steam Library, Steam Chat, Steam Messaging and Steam Broadcasting).

The UK operator claims in its official complaint via the Delaware District Court (USA), which was submitted at the end of July 2016, that Valve has infringed upon four of its key patents and that BT has tried and failed “on multiple occasions” to contact Valve about its related services or systems.

Valve has derived and will continue to derive substantial value from these products and services which incorporate the patented technologies. Nonetheless, Valve has failed to respond to BT’s correspondence, at all, and chosen instead to continue to infringe the Patents-in-Suit wilfully and wantonly,” claims BT.

The Four USA Patents

US6578079 – Communications node for providing network based information service
US6334142 – Method for automatic and periodic requests for messages to an e-mail server from the client
US6694375 – Communications network and method having accessible directory of user profile data
US7167142 – Multi-user display system

The claims seem surprisingly broad (in a few cases it almost appears as if they’re trying to claim patent infringement over some fairly common software processes) and indeed BT could perhaps arguably have made similar challenges against other big online content and digital distribution giants, such as YouTube (Google).

On the other hand BT’s document does go into quite a bit of detail and if Valve are truly infringing then they’ll have to compensate BT or reach a new licensing agreement. At least the courts should finally attract a response from Valve, which so far has chosen not to respond.

BT’s Court Filing Statement

On October 8, 2015, the chief counsel for Intellectual Property Rights of BT (“BT’s IPR Counsel”) sent a letter to Valve’s General Counsel, identifying the Patents-In-Suit and providing clear notice that Valve infringed them. The October 8, 2015 letter provided a summary of each Patent-In-Suit and enclosed claim charts explaining Valve’s infringement of a representative claim, in detail, on an element-by-element basis.

Neither Valve’s General Counsel, nor anyone else at Valve, responded to BT’s October 8, 2015 letter. On December 21, 2015, BT’s IPR counsel sent a follow-up letter to Valve’s General Counsel reminding Valve that BT had not received any response from Valve and inviting a response. Once again, neither Valve’s General Counsel nor anyone else at Valve responded to BT.

On April 11, 2016, BT’s IPR counsel sent yet another letter to Valve’s General Counsel indicating that it had been almost seven months since Valve had been placed on notice of infringement without a response. BT noted that its efforts to initiate a dialogue with Valve regarding Valve’s ongoing infringement had gone un-acknowledged and un-answered. BT advised Valve that if Valve did not respond, BT would have the right to pursue damages against Valve for Valve’s willful infringement of BT’s patents.

Yet again, neither Valve’s General Counsel nor anyone else at Valve responded to BT’s letter.

At this point it’s worth remembering that BT once (2012) also bizarrely tried to claim a patent over Hyperlinks, although as a company they’ve also faced plenty of patent challenges themselves from the likes of ASSIA (e.g. Dynamic Spectrum Management) and Google (e.g. Internet-phone systems and control of server data) among others.

Being a big telecoms business, especially one that has shaped so much of how modern communications networks work, means a lot of fighting to protect your corner. Never the less related cases, especially ones that cover such a wide remit, do have a tendency to drag on and so we might not see the outcome of this for awhile.

Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £24.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £15.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5473)
  2. BT (3505)
  3. Politics (2525)
  4. Openreach (2291)
  5. Business (2251)
  6. Building Digital UK (2234)
  7. FTTC (2041)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1961)
  9. Statistics (1780)
  10. 4G (1654)
  11. Virgin Media (1608)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1451)
  13. Fibre Optic (1392)
  14. Wireless Internet (1386)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon