
Telecoms analyst firm Point Topic has published further analysis of the £2bn acquisition of full fibre alternative UK broadband network Netomnia (Substantial Group) by the parents of nexfibre and Virgin Media (O2). The research highlights how much of a bearing a single piece of competition-law math – the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) – may have on the deal being cleared or not.
The HHI is a widely used measure of market concentration and competitiveness, but working it out accurately requires a strong understanding of the networks, technologies, operators, coverage, and demographics across the UK market (inc. mapping exactly where networks physically overlap), which Point Topic believes is something it can do to a credible degree.
The above is important because the HHI figure will be one that the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) must examine as part of their Phase 2 competition investigation (here), which could dictate how seriously they view the acquisition and the impact it may have on the wider market.
Advertisement
Critics of the deal, particularly CityFibre, which had also been trying to acquire Netomnia before the nexfibre move was announced, have previously stated that there was a lot of overlap between the nexfibre / Virgin Media and Netomnia broadband networks. A prior Point Topic study put the figure at 832,000 premises, albeit only when looking at the FTTP side of these networks (here); there’s much more overbuild with Virgin’s Hybrid Fibre Coax (HFC).
Now let’s take a look what the same analyst predicts for the HHI figure – both before and after the merger, which at first glance appears to exceed the “serious concern” threshold.

The full analysis is well worth a read and broadly highlights why the CMA may be likely to identify some real competition concerns with the agreement, at least when looking purely at the market for alternative networks (altnets). But the assessment does change a bit when you factor in Openreach’s deployment of FTTP broadband across 23 million UK premises and growing.
Advertisement
“Nexfibre’s lawyers will want to argue: how can a company controlling 16% of the real market be a competition problem, when the incumbent controls two-thirds of it?,” said Point Topic. But the analyst points out that regulators like the CMA don’t typically define markets by whichever framing makes a deal look best – “they look at where genuine competitive constraint operates today”.
Point Topic’s Conclusion
Openreach’s scale is real, but it was already priced into the market before this deal was ever proposed, and it doesn’t get more or less dominant because nexfibre buys Netomnia. What does change, directly and measurably, is how many independent wholesale options an ISP has within the Altnet segment specifically. That number drops from three meaningful independents (CityFibre, Netomnia, nexfibre) to two (CityFibre and the merged entity).
Expect the CMA’s Phase 2 assessment to centre on the narrower Altnet-only market as the primary competitive issue, with the Openreach comparison treated as useful context rather than the deciding frame.
What This Points To
An HHI increase this large, on a market this concentrated, rarely results in either an outright block or a clean, condition-free pass. The more probable outcome is conditional clearance – most likely paired with wholesale non-discrimination commitments toward independent ISPs, pricing safeguards in overlapping regions, or, in a firmer scenario, a mandated divestment of specific infrastructure to preserve a genuine third player in the market.
For anyone with a stake in UK fibre, investors weighing the deal’s odds, ISPs negotiating wholesale contracts, or rival Altnets thinking about their own M&A prospects, the HHI math is the clearest signal available right now for how seriously the CMA is going to take this one.
As we’ve said before. Given the CMA’s recent flexibility toward big telecoms mergers (e.g. Three UK and Vodafone), as well as the Government’s positive welcome, it’s perhaps not unreasonable to expect that the CMA may ultimately allow the deal through. But this is certainly not guaranteed and nobody would be surprised if such approval came attached to a few concessions, such as around certain wholesale requirements.
The CMA’s Phase 2 investigation must reach its conclusion before the statutory deadline of 15th December 2026.
Key Points of the Nexfibre + Netomnia Deal
➤ InfraVia, Liberty Global and Telefónica are committing £1bn in new net funding for nexfibre to fund the transaction – made up of £850m from InfraVia and £150m jointly from Liberty Global and Telefónica.
➤ Nexfibre will sell Substantial Group’s retail business, including the YouFibre brand (Brsk has been retired), to VMO2 for £150m – covering c.500,000 customers.
➤ Nexfibre will finance the FTTP upgrade of 2.1 million homes covered by Virgin Media’s old HFC network (i.e. those that are “adjacent” to the Netomnia footprint). We’ve already seen this process begin (here).
➤ VMO2 will pay wholesale fibre access fees on its customers within the 2.5 million VMO2 homes that overlap the Netomnia fibre footprint.
➤ In exchange for the wholesale traffic commitment on the 4.6m premises, Virgin Media O2 will receive 1) c. £1.1bn in cash and 2) an indirect 15% stake in nexfibre. The vast majority of the proceeds will be available for deleveraging and the £150m to finance the purchase of Substantial Group’s 500,000 customer base.
➤ VMO2 will provide a full suite of managed services to nexfibre – including construction – in return for ongoing management and construction fees.
Advertisement
Can’t be a coincidence netomnia have just decided to make 200 people redundant
Sounds like an administrative nightmare or tax dodge.
We’ll give you some shares if you use our network but we’ll pay you to provide some management etc. etc. So long as we can convince everyone we’re not one big business just a collection of small ones and therefore don’t need the regulator’s involvement…..