In a controversial twist the Government’s Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has called on a superfast broadband project in Rothbury (Northumberland), which received a slice of state aid, to repay any benefits derived from claw-back (as opposed to reinvesting into better coverage).
As a quick recap, DEFRA’s Rural Community Broadband Fund (RCBF) originally invested £460,000 to help BT deploy a new superfast broadband (FTTC/P) network around the area. The project, which complements Northumberland’s wider Broadband Delivery UK programme, went well and was finally completed at the end of last year (here).
Like most such contracts the agreement contains a claw-back clause. The details of the Rothbury contract aren’t known, although many BDUK schemes adopt a claw-back level of around 20%. In other words, once take-up of the state aid fuelled superfast broadband network reaches above 20% then some of the original investment can start to be returned and used to further improve coverage or with related upgrades.
The mechanism for this is widely understood and it’s one of the reasons why ISPreview.co.uk keeps such a close eye on the take-up of BDUK projects (here). But now it appears as if DEFRA and BDUK have, in at least one example, begun demanding that any benefit from claw-back be returned (Northumberland Gazette). Happily the local council and BT aren’t playing ball.
Steven Bridgett, County Councillor for Rothbury, said:
“I understand that the Government and Defra have made a request that any clawback funding from the Rothbury Rural Broadband Project is returned to them and not reinvested into bringing superfast broadband to other communities in Coquetdale.
I am pleased to say that both officers at County Hall and senior management at BT believe that under the terms of the contract, Defra cannot have the clawback funding. We intend to oppose this and move forward with plans to invest the money into delivering superfast broadband to more rural communities in Coquetdale such as Newtown, Hepple, Holystone and Sharperton.
Our rural area should not be penalised for being successful in drawing down the funding and having one of the highest subscription rates in the North East, something which has allowed us to begin clawback of some of the public money invested, so that we can invest it in bringing superfast speeds to more communities.”
The Northumberland County Council are currently hoping to reach some sort of agreement on the matter, although what happens in one area could just as easily occur elsewhere. Most contracts should offer some protection against such moves, although we have seen a few local authorities using more ambiguous language (i.e. failing to clearly specify that claw-back will be used on further broadband upgrades/coverage) and those could be at greater risk.
On the other hand there is an argument that the RCBF scheme for Rothbury is a semi-separate deployment from the wider BDUK project, which in turn may give rise to the suggestion that claw-back might not be usable outside of the area. But this is purely speculation on our part.
Comments are closed