A new report from analyst firm Enders Analysis, which was recently shared with ISPreview, has revealed that broadband traffic volume growth across most developed countries has “slowed to a relative crawl” to become the “new normal” (i.e. falling from 30%+ for many years and now at 10-15%). The story is similar for mobile (4G, 5G etc.) services (falling to 5-10%).
The study – ‘Low growth needs a new approach‘, which examined data/internet traffic across several developed markets, including the US, UK, Germany, France, Italy and Spain, noted how there had been many years of fairly strong and consistent growth until around 2020. Traffic then surged during the COVID-19 pandemic as people locked themselves away at home and worked remotely, but then sharply dropped back in 2021 to correct itself.
However, rather than return to the level it was at before, traffic volumes across both fixed broadband and mobile (mobile broadband) connectivity have instead continued to fall and remain significantly below pre-pandemic levels. This is more than just a post-pandemic correction, and is now said to be the “new normal“.
Advertisement
“Telcos (and governments/regulators) would therefore be advised to be prepared for this slower growth to be the new normal, and break away from previous habits of perpetually referring to explosive traffic growth and assuming that the latest high-capacity telecoms technologies need to be deployed everywhere for a high-tech economy to be able to function,” said Enders.
Broadband subscriber growth has also slowed to 0-3% post-pandemic, although this is perhaps less of a surprise given the huge impact that COVID-19 had on society (trigging lots of people to get a broadband service installed or upgraded) and the maturity of modern network coverage. For example, in the UK 30Mbps+ connections now cover 98% of premises and gigabit broadband reaches 86% (here), while there’s only a small portion of the population left to get online.
Advertisement
The issue of slowing traffic growth can also be partly linked back to the limited development and take-up of higher quality video streams. Most consumer internet traffic is generated by video content (IPTV, Streaming etc.) and so any developments in this field can have a big impact on traffic volumes.
On this front we haven’t seen much forward development since the introduction of 4K (Ultra HD), which is partly because higher quality standards like 8K and beyond are largely irrelevant to the screen sizes people are still using these days (Smartphones, laptops, tablets etc.). Streaming services often also continue to price 4K content at a premium, which suppresses take-up.
At the same time, online video providers have been adopting more efficient codecs, which compress those higher quality videos into ever smaller data packets that use less bandwidth to deliver the same stream – often significantly less.
Advertisement
Enders notes that other bandwidth-hungry services, which were once expected to help drive future growth in internet traffic, have failed to deliver. For example, cloud gaming has been about to take off for years, with many failed attempts, but most people still prefer to own their own copy of a game (digital or physical). Virtual reality, augmented reality and virtual presence have also been slow to take off, despite much hype a few years ago.
Enders Analysis Statement
Looking forward, there are a number of drivers of future traffic growth, which may well lead to spikes in individual years, but appear unlikely to lead to the sustained 30%+ per annum growth of the past. Firstly, live TV is (slowly) migrating to the internet in many countries, with platforms such as Sky Stream and Freely in the UK looking to make this transition seamless from a user experience perspective, and allow cost savings from (eventually) shutting down legacy broadcast platforms.
Live TV still has very significant volumes (around 40% of video viewing in the UK), and any sudden shifts would cause serious traffic spikes, but given a likely transition period of 10-15 years at least, this would not support sustained 30%+ per annum volume growth.
The impact of AI on traffic volumes is varied and still highly uncertain, with inter-data centre volumes already significantly impacted, and the impact from AI-based bots and AI-enabled video sensors could be very significant. However, online video traffic consists of hours a day of high bandwidth traffic to pretty much every individual in the country, and no other application (even AI-supported) looks likely to be able to match this traffic load, let alone exceed it to the extent required to drive high growth for many years.
The flip side of this, as touched on earlier in this article, is that the capital expenditure requirements on network operators will be “very much lower“, with “continuous capacity upgrades no longer required“. But we think it might have been more accurate to say that they’d take place more gradually, over a longer window of time, rather than simply being “no longer required“. The catch is that a lower frequency of network upgrades (i.e. core capacity rather than local access technologies) risk making any existing network deficiencies more obvious.
All of this seems unlikely to have much of a negative impact on the rising take-up of modern full fibre (FTTP) broadband networks, where many consumers are often just happy to get a reliable service that can actually deliver on the promised speeds (something older copper ADSL/FTTC networks often struggled to do). Not to mention the inevitable withdrawal of copper-based lines, which over the next few years will push everybody on to optical fibre.
Advertisement
4k video on TV seems to be with programmes with the film look that looks no different to HD on most TVs.
There’s a limit to how many phone calls and emails people want to make and send each day.
Just the normal maturing of a market then (once everyone’s got one….). As the Netflix graph shows a decent FTTC connection is more than adequate for the average consumer who just wants to watch TV. It seems to me that most upgrades to FTTP just happen organically when the customer is recontracting & most customers probably don’t really notice that much difference in day to day use.
But this is nothing to do with FTTC or FTTP, but more to do with traffic over the network. Faster speeds don’t make more traffic, I have said this for a while.
I don;lt do anything different with 500Mb/s fibre than I did with 36Mb/s FTTC, I stream video, I listen to music online, listen to radio stations online and still have the same smart home stuff. The only difference is that I can download and upload stuff quicker.
So network traffic to my router is more or less the same as it was.
Sure, some people may watch 4K more with FTTP than they did with FTTC, but I don’t think it would make much difference.
As someone else have said, the market has matured, people are no doubt using all the steaming services they are going to use, you are normally only going to stream one thing at a time unless you have multiple people in the house, and then it is still the same traffic, just maybe all at once instead of spread out.
I must admit, since i have had FTTP, I am more likely to download software for the PC than use files I already have on hard drives, after all, you get the latest version online and downloading with 500Mb\s is pretty quick even for large files. But the difference that will make to traffic is minimal unless i am doing it every day,m whihc I am not
Contrast these numbers with Link’s review of 2024:
“In 2024, LINX achieved its highest-ever network traffic, with a maximum peak of over 10.841 terabits per second (Tbps), up from 9.229 Tbps in 2023 and 7.424 Tbps in 2022.” which works out at about 17pc growth in 2024.
That’s peak though, not average and 17% is not far off the 15% quoted in the article.
It would be nice to see bitrates on streaming content attempt to make use of the connections that people have. £13/month to be served a 5Mbps stream seems wrong. It’s surprising that one of the multi-gig fibre providers hasn’t got a partnership with Netflix going to bundle some sort of 50Mbps 4K package with their connection, even if it’s just as a marketing exercise.
“Not to mention the inevitable withdrawal of copper-based lines, which over the next few years will push everybody on to optical fibre.”
Nope, last century people started phoning people so that the idea of phoning a place by landline became irrelevant.
So Optical as successor to Copper, misses completely the reality that communication is inter personal and people consume services from the cloud.
Nobody wants to build and sustain their own premises equipment IT when all the IT drudgery is done at the cloud.
Those of us who want UHD 4K without dropout use local media UHD BD, and those who don’t make do with streaming that already works, well enough on FTTC.
FTTP in rural areas without even a plan is a missed opportunity that OR dropped.