Home
 » ISP News » 

SignalTracker highlights poor mobile broadband speeds in central London

Saturday, Sep 19th, 2026 (12:01 am) - Score 920
SignalTracker-central-London-mobile-data-speeds

A new study from SignalTracker, which operates a popular Android mobile app (not iOS) for monitoring and testing mobile network performance, has used its own data to support a separate BBC News article, which this week wrote about the problems of poor mobile network (4G and 5G) performance across key parts of the UK’s capital city.

According to a separate data study from Inakalum, which was commissioned by BBC London, some of the worst areas of the city for mobile reception and performance were Liverpool Street and Covent Garden. The study surveyed three streets all within a few minutes’ walk of Covent Garden, on a weekday evening. The results showed that more than one in four data tests across EE, O2, Three UK and Vodafone failed outright.

Even when the networks worked, the mobile broadband speed was found to be unreliable or slow – typically coming in below 15Mbps (Megabits per second). Interestingly both EE and O2 delivered the strongest performance here, while Vodafone and Three UK tended to fight over the slowest two spots. Three UK was also the operator with the greatest proportion of tests that returned no data connectivity at all (between 95-100%).

Advertisement

However, most of those tests took place at peak (busy) times, but when the same study was conducted during off-peak (less busy) periods all four mobile networks were said to have performed well. In other words, many of the issues could perhaps be put down to problems of network congestion rather than signal coverage.

The trade association that represents the UK’s major mobile networks, Mobile UK, acknowledges that London’s mobile phone connectivity “continues to lag frustratingly behind other international hubs“. The situation has now been confirmed by separate independent testing by users of SignalTracker’s app, which similarly examined the streets around both Covent Garden and St Paul’s.

Of our signal strength and download speed readings in Covent Garden, 29% measured download speeds of less than 15 Mbps. Vodafone Three recorded the lowest download speeds. In the City of London near St Paul’s, SignalTracker data suggested that 44% of all recorded tests measured under 15 Mbps,” said Laura Sear of SignalTracker.

SignalTracker-central-London-mobile-performance

Advertisement

One of the key problem areas is known to be infrastructure planning, including a lack of resources in local planning departments and other things like the Notices to Quit (NTQ) planning measure. The latter has been in the news a couple of times recently after O2 and Vodafone separately complained that it sometimes forces them to take their cell sites offline (masts and other rooftop sites), often without first being given enough time to ensure an appropriate replacement site.

The above is a particular problem when it impacts rooftop sites on existing buildings, such as when the property owner seeks to renovate, redevelop or demolished a building. However, as we’ve said before, mobile operators can hardly expect to hold much sway over major property developments, particularly when they’re often paying only relatively small rental sums to the landowners (holding up major developments at huge cost doesn’t seem like the fairest of balances).

Similarly, mobile infrastructure isn’t installed in a vacuum and planning authorities also have to consider other issues, such as public opinion, visual impact, safety and so forth etc.

A government (DCMS) spokesperson said:

“Fast, reliable digital infrastructure is fundamental to a growing economy, keeping people connected wherever they live, work or commute. That’s why we are working with industry to deliver our ambition for higher-quality standalone 5G coverage across all populated areas of the UK by 2030.

We recognise that demand on mobile networks is growing, particularly in busy urban areas, and are reviewing planning rules and working through our Mobile Market Review to support investment, improve network performance and make it quicker and easier to build the infrastructure consumers and businesses need.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
4 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo clearmind60 says:

    Not only central, W London and SW London.

  2. Avatar photo Darren says:

    Not really surprising, high rise buildings, exceptionally high density of people using mobile services must create a significant challenge to delivering the services.

    1. Avatar photo Vauk says:

      If you travel in Asia (Korea, Japan, china) there is an antenna literally every 2 building.
      There your phone last the 32 hour they say during presentation.

      Here in the UK it’s just bad planning and cost saving.

    2. Avatar photo Josh Welby says:

      Correct about bad Planning
      and Cost Savings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £22.99
145Mbps
Gift: £140 Reward Card
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £23.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £23.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
giffgaff UK ISP Logo
giffgaff £14.00
Contract: 18 Months
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £16.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £18.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
New Forum Topics
By: The Wee Bear
By: The Wee Bear
By: The Wee Bear
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift:
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Grain Connect UK ISP Logo
250Mbps
Gift: £25 Bill Credit
Zzoomm UK ISP Logo
Zzoomm £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact