Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

UK ISPs Lose Appeal Against Website Blocks for Trade Mark Abuse

Wednesday, July 6th, 2016 (12:32 pm) - Score 1,007
internet law uk

Several big UK broadband ISPs, including BT, Sky Broadband, EE, TalkTalk and Virgin Media, have lost an appeal against a 2014 ruling by the High Court, which extended court ordered website blocking to include sites that sell counterfeit goods (i.e. abuse of Trade Mark).

At present ISPs can be forced, via a court order, to block websites if they are found to facilitate Internet copyright infringement (piracy) under Section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act. But in 2014 this ruling was extended to include sites that sell counterfeit goods (here) and thus abuse company trademarks / logos.

Aside from the unlikely risk that this could be applied in an overzealous way (imagine eBay being blocked), the ISPs complained that Cartier and Montblanc (they raised the original case) had provided “no evidence” that their networks were being abused to infringe Trade Marks and that the UK Trade Mark Act does not include a provision for website blocking.

The ISPs also noted that such sites weren’t heavily used, unlike the major piracy havens that have already been restricted, and thus they felt as if it would not be proportionate for them to suffer the costs involved.

Suffice to say that in April 2016 the case went to the Court of Appeal (London) and today the court moved to uphold the original 2014 ruling, which means that ISPs will have to continue blocking such websites and must also stomach the ever rising costs involved. Not forgetting that Rights Holders also have to spend thousands of pounds just to get even one site blocked.

As for the ISPs, they incur on-going costs as part of their work to introduce such blocks. For example, EE previously suggested that a “near four figure sum” was involved with each update, while Sky points to a “mid three figure sum” and then roughly half that for future updates. Similarly Virgin Media pegged their own annual costs at a “low five figure sum“.

Statement from Bristows LLP (London Law Firm):

“Today, the Court of Appeal has confirmed a High Court’s landmark 2014 decision against internet service providers, requiring them to block access to websites which sell counterfeit goods. The Court of Appeal also said that the costs of implementing such a blocking order should fall on the ISPs, rather than the rights holders who benefit from the order.

The decision will be seen as positive news by brand owners concerned with the difficulties of dealing with counterfeit goods selling websites, who are often based out of the jurisdiction and prove difficult to deal with. ISPs, though, will now have to bear the costs of implementing such blocking orders for trade mark owners, in the same way that they have borne the cost of implementing orders which block access to websites which host copyright infringing works.”

We can probably expect to see a lot more Trade Mark related blocks in the future.

Delicious
Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he is also the founder of ISPreview since 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
2 Responses
  1. dragoneast

    Inevitable. Taming the web.

    Once we as consumers want the benefit of the law for on-line business when it suits us, as we do, we have to take the consequences when it doesn’t. Same as for everything else. But, as in the physical world too, the law is always playing catch up.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £17.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Code: ONLINEDEAL
  • Vodafone £20.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.50
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £23.99 (*34.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • First Utility £24.99 (*31.99)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
Poll
*Javascript must be ON to vote*
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2229)
  2. FTTP (1641)
  3. FTTC (1463)
  4. Broadband Delivery UK (1458)
  5. Openreach (1180)
  6. Politics (1177)
  7. Business (1053)
  8. Statistics (931)
  9. Fibre Optic (856)
  10. Mobile Broadband (841)
  11. Ofcom Regulation (777)
  12. Wireless Internet (775)
  13. FTTH (752)
  14. 4G (731)
  15. Virgin Media (719)
  16. Sky Broadband (533)
  17. TalkTalk (511)
  18. EE (481)
  19. Vodafone (374)
  20. Security (361)
New Forum Topics
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms  ,  Privacy and Cookie Policy  ,  Links  ,  Website Rules