Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Ofcom Owes UK Mobile Operators £220m in Licence Fee Dispute

Monday, May 20th, 2019 (5:04 pm) - Score 1,615
mobile mast uk in circle

The UK High Court of Justice has ruled that Ofcom must pay back £220m to mobile operators as part of restitution for the regulator’s handling of a licence fee hike to the 900MHz and 1800MHz (3G and 4G) spectrum bands (i.e. £82.4m to EE, £54.4m for Vodafone, £54.4m for O2 and £26.9m for Three UK).

The situation arguably began in December 2010, after the then coalition Government directed Ofcom to revise fees for mobile spectrum in the 900MHz and 1800MHz bands in order to reflect the “full market value” of those frequencies, as well as other statutory duties. The regulator duly proposed a huge hike in licence fees (here) and so began a long running legal battle.

The core matter now appears to have been largely resolved after Ofcom failed to follow proper process when raising their fees and another revision was proposed at the end of last year (here). Meanwhile there has also been a dispute over the question of how much money should be paid back to the operators for fees taken (i.e. the difference between how much operators would have paid under the original 2011 model and how much they did pay under the unlawful 2015 revision).

The parties have all agreed that simple interest be awarded on whatever sum is due, calculated at 2% above the Bank of England base rate from time to time. The figures were actually agreed by Ofcom, though it disputed the entitlement to claim the net sum (i.e. the figures stated in the first paragraph above) and hence the latest case, which they’ve lost.

The Judgement

To summarise the above, my conclusions are as follows:

a. I accept the submissions of the MNOs that there is a principle of legality which precludes the exaction by a public authority of an unlawful fee or charge and, equally, facilitates the recovery of unlawfully exacted fees through a claim in unjust enrichment.

b. Where an unlawful fee has been exacted, the payer will in principle be able to make a claim in unjust enrichment for the return of the fee (subject of course to applicable defences). But where a lawful fee could and would have been charged, then the claim is likely to be for the net sum.

c. In determining whether a lawful fee could and would have been charged, and if so the amount of that fee, it may be necessary or helpful to hypothesise the taking of necessary administrative steps which were omitted, for the purpose of fixing the proper amount.

d. There is no warrant for hypothesising a new legal entitlement in order to render that which was unlawful notionally lawful, which would be to undermine the principle of legality; it would also tilt the balance unfairly towards public authority payees making unlawful demands.

e. Nor, and separately, is there any warrant for hypothesising a change in the law. On the contrary, where parties have proceeded on the basis of an existing legislative framework, the law of unjust enrichment should not be used to undermine those legal relations.

In such circumstances, I am satisfied that the MNOs are entitled to succeed in their claims for the net sum, as I consider that they are supported by general principle and, conversely, that Ofcom’s alternative principle is flawed.

Naturally the mobile operators will be pleased with this outcome (The Register confirms as much), while Ofcom noted that the case “has been decided on what is a technical and important point of law“; the judge recognised this by granting them permission to appeal. Suffice to say this battle may not be over just yet and much will depend upon whether or not the regulator pursues an appeal.

Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
2 Responses
  1. Avatar NGA for all

    This is over-due. I hope more ways are found to challenge the pimping of spectrum.

  2. Avatar Michael V

    Well I’m happy with this. The fees should never have been increased. Ofcom bang on about coverage, quality, but are quick to take money & slam fines on the MNOs. The fees need to be manageable for all four Operators, fairly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £15.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Code: FLASH19
  • Vodafone £22.00 (*24.00)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.45
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Direct Save Telecom £22.95 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Origin Broadband £23.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2406)
  2. FTTP (1996)
  3. FTTC (1596)
  4. Building Digital UK (1547)
  5. Politics (1341)
  6. Openreach (1334)
  7. Business (1179)
  8. Statistics (1041)
  9. Mobile Broadband (966)
  10. FTTH (964)
  11. Fibre Optic (941)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (879)
  13. Wireless Internet (861)
  14. 4G (847)
  15. Virgin Media (808)
  16. Sky Broadband (574)
  17. TalkTalk (556)
  18. EE (555)
  19. Vodafone (469)
  20. Security (394)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact