The Government has today placed their previous decision to BAN Huawei’s equipment from ultrafast 5G mobile networks (including restrictions on its use in full fibre broadband infrastructure) on more of a legal footing, which it has done by issuing legal notices to 35 telecoms network operators.
Back in 2020 the government announced that it would ban “high risk vendors” from future 5G rollouts (here and here), which followed various US sanctions and security concerns around the role of Chinese firm Huawei in UK networks (ZTE is also banned). The ban has already started to come into force, and the removal of all existing 5G kit must follow by the end of 2027.
As part of that process, the Government has today issued a new document – called a Designated Vendor Direction (DVD) – to 35 UK telecoms network operators. It puts the government’s previous position to remove Huawei kit from UK 5G networks on a legal footing, and they’ve previously warned that operators which fail to meet the current deadlines could face fines of up to 10% of turnover or £100,000 per day.
Huawei itself has also been issued with a separate document – a Designation Notice (DN) – which we’re told formally “categorises the company as a high-risk vendor of 5G network equipment and services“. The designation notice sets out all of the reasons for which the government considers Huawei to pose a national security risk, including the impact of the sanctions.
The direction sets out the final controls to be placed on operators’ use of Huawei, which we’ve summarised below.
Huawei Controls for UK Mobile and Fibre Networks
➤ An immediate ban on the installation of new Huawei equipment in 5G networks;
➤ A requirement to remove Huawei equipment from 5G networks by the end of 2027;
➤ A requirement to remove Huawei equipment from the network core by 31 December 2023;
➤ A requirement to limit Huawei to 35 per cent of the full fibre [FTTP] access network by 31 October 2023;
➤ A requirement to remove Huawei equipment from sites significant to national security by 28 January 2023; and
➤ A requirement not to install any Huawei equipment that has been affected by US sanctions in full fibre networks.
The key deadline to remove all Huawei equipment from the UK’s 5G network by 2027 remains unchanged, as do eight of the other interim deadlines to guide operators in meeting the 2027 deadline. BT had previously also argued that the 28th January 2023 date to remove all Huawei equipment from the core of their telecoms network may be difficult to achieve (here).
The government note that for a small number of operators, the two interim deadlines for the core and 35% of the full fibre access network “could have led to network outages and disruption for customers, due to delays caused by the pandemic and global supply chain issues.” As a result, they’ve now formally set interim deadlines that “balance the need to remove Huawei as swiftly as possible while avoiding unnecessary instability in networks.”
Digital Secretary, Michelle Donelan, said:
“We must have confidence in the security of our phone and internet networks which underpin so much about our economy and everyday lives.
Thanks to this government’s tough new laws we can drive up the security of telecoms infrastructure and control the use of high-risk equipment.
Today I’m using these powers and making it a legal requirement for Huawei to be removed from 5G networks by 2027.”
As part of today’s announcement, the Government has also published its response (here) to their targeted consultation on a proposed ban, which was held earlier this year with Huawei and other telecoms companies under the provisions of the Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021.
Mobile operators have previously warned that the decision to remove Huawei, which also impacts existing 4G kit due to the close interdependency of such networks, could delay the completion of the 5G rollout by 2-3 years and add costs of up to £2bn across all operators (except for O2 / VMO2 as they opted to go with Ericsson for 5G). BT alone previously said they would take a £500m hit from all this.
Chinese companies are state owned, engaging with them is not only giving them full access to UK data but also directly funding their genocide. UK companies cutting corners to buy cheaper equipment from them deserve this
To be fair, a mass of what people and businesses buy today can be ‘made in China’, and even when it’s not then some of the internal components may still come from China (you won’t necessarily know about this). In practical terms, it’s difficult to be an absolutist in a market of complex global supply chains, where most of the time you aren’t told which bits come from where.
True but while it may be impossible to avoid “may have components made in china” it is very possible to avoid “100% fully made in china”
Every Iphone could be used as a spying device – so as they haven’t done this maybe it’s all hyped up a bit?
Didn’t realise Huawei is state owned…
Plus yes UK business buy into made/assembled in China due to cost. Helps keep cost down. Keeps profit levels decent at the same time keeps cost of product down, in theory for end consumer.
I don’t understand why if it’s such a threat that these companies have until 2027 to sort it out. Surely that’s telling any potential spies that they’ve got a continued 5 years to soak up as much as they can before they’re out. I understand it will cost a lot of money to replace it, but it can’t be so much of a threat if the timeline for replacing it is so long. Also is the 2027 date for the ‘core network’ equipment ? or for all Huawei kit? And what of ZTE and others?
Isn’t the new three home broadband device a ZTE? they gone from a banned device to another? oops!
No wonder there is a 30 day guarantee going on
Why ban Huawei when there sister company honour is allowed to keep selling their phones baffles me absolute scam going on here as the tech that’s in Huaweis phones are in honours phone just not as good. obviously they was about to out compete the iPhone that’s the real reason..
The way Truss is going she will be placing sanctions on China soon enough, she stated before she wants to do that. Almost everything is ‘made in China’, because companies want more profit, and stuff is made far cheaper in China without pesky employment rights getting in the way of those profits making things cost more.
We have to hope the alternative brands are making as good as or better equipment.
Nokia’s seems pretty good here.
Has anyone notice mobile call and broadband issues. Certainly getting worse over last 18 months.
Phone calls/ broadband and house WiFi very laggy really fed up with virgin just now and I have been with the for 19 years now … tellywest before virgin Tesco’s sim only worse network I have ever been with will be changing both at end of contracts…
For anyone wondering the scale of the difference – for years Huawei have heavily involved themselves at any level of telecoms they can get into and had product parity with Cisco kit and indeed were more flexible. They would also throw any amount of extra project and sales resource into anything asked for and be on the ball. Then there was the standard 85% discount off list price (list price was very close onto Cisco). It allowed for a lot of things to be possible at a price point that previously wasn’t and also for companies that didn’t have the capability to otherwise compete.
Is there a list of companies this notice was issued to? cant see one in the article
The UK is dumb.. thats the tweet.