Crowdsourced benchmarking firm Opensignal has today published their latest Mobile Network Experience Report for H2 2024, which examines the 4G and 5G (mobile broadband) services of all four primary networks – EE, Vodafone, O2 and Three UK – to find which delivers the best performance. Overall, EE scooped 10 out of 14 awards.
As usual, the report is based off data (speed and signal tests etc.) gathered from people using hundreds of thousands of devices (Smartphones etc.) between 1st June and 29th August 2024. The results were then processed to reveal how the primary mobile network operators compared across various categories.
The study continues to be predominantly focused upon the combined performance of 3G, 4G and 5G networks, but it also splits out some of the results for 5G-only connections. Overall, EE continued to pick up the win for most of the performance categories in the primary study, while Three UK came top for 5G download speed, 5G upload speed and general network availability (i.e. % of time users spent connected to a network), albeit not 5G availability where EE now tops the table.
Advertisement
Elsewhere, O2 only managed to pick up one win for ‘Coverage Experience’, while Vodafone failed to score any wins across any categories – despite still performing reasonably well in several areas.
Download Speed Experience – All Mobile Connections
(H2 2023 Result in Brackets)1. EE 45.9Mbps (40Mbps)
2. Three UK 38Mbps (34.5Mbps)
3. Vodafone 31.1Mbps (27.9Mbps)
4. O2 23.1Mbps (20.9Mbps)
Upload Speed Experience – All Mobile Connections
1. EE 9.8Mbps (9.3Mbps)
2. Vodafone 7.8Mbps (8Mbps)
3. Three UK 7.1Mbps (6.3Mbps)
4. O2 5.3Mbps (5Mbps)
Download Speeds – 5G
1. Three UK 208.9Mbps (205.5Mbps)
2. Vodafone 138.7Mbps (114.3Mbps)
3. EE 96.8Mbps (99.5Mbps)
4. O2 80.1Mbps (77Mbps)
Upload Speeds – 5G
1. Three UK 19.2Mbps (17.5Mbps)
2. EE 17.7Mbps (15.9Mbps)
3. Vodafone 15.1Mbps (14.9Mbps)
4. O2 10.1Mbps (10Mbps)
UK Availability % – All Mobile Connections
1. Three UK 99.2% (99.1%)
2. EE 98.5% (98.5%)
3. O2 97.4% (97.3%)
4. Vodafone 95.4% (97.5%)
UK Availability % – 5G
1. EE 13.2% (10.6%)
2. Vodafone 9.6% (10%)
3. Three UK 9.3% (10.3%)
4. O2 8.3% (10.1%)
Overall, most of the mobile operators seemed to record a performance improvement over this time last year, albeit with smaller changes now that the first generation 5G deployments have reached some level of maturity. But sadly, O2 continued to generally trend toward the bottom of the pack across most of the key performance metrics.
However, the 5G availability (% of time spent on 5G) performance of Vodafone, Three UK and O2 all seemed to suffer a fall over this time last year, with O2’s drop from 10.1% to 8.3% being particularly pronounced. We aren’t quite sure why this has occurred, although 5G availability is one of those areas that can be affected by external factors that impact signal strength (e.g. the weather) and other changes (i.e. it doesn’t mean that 5G coverage shrank). The 3G switch off and wider changes in 4G signal strength, such as via the ‘Share Rural Network’ programme, may have also impacted this area.
Advertisement
Naturally, there are caveats to this sort of study, such as the fact that app-based crowdsourced data can be impacted by any limitations or locations of the devices or plans being used, which at the same time removes the ability to adopt a common type of hardware and environment to help form a solid baseline. Naturally, some operators also have better 4G or 5G coverage, lots of spectrum bands and more advanced networks than others too.
Suffice to say that performance testing like this may not always tell the whole story, although Opensignal are generally one of the better organisations at analysing such data.
Advertisement
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
EE does seem the best network, and I’ve noticed an anecdotal degradation since switching to SMARTY (a.k.a. 3) – but it’s good enough overall. I’m not personally bothered about speed, more about reliability and coverage.
And the enormous cost difference with ‘premium’ EE is just too much to ignore now (we were on BT before but obviously they no longer offer mobile tariffs under their brand). I can get everything I need for £7/month, and spend the difference on better broadband 🙂
I am personally on Smarty but if you want a budget connection to EE then 1pmobile may be the one. My dad is on the 1 year talker plan so not a lot data but you can get decent amounts of data on other of their plans.
I switched from 3 to Smarty (3 years ago) after being with 3 for about 7 years and noticed no difference apart from the much reduced cost.
Someone explain the difference between coverage experience and availability please?
The full report generalises this a bit too much, but the definition of Coverage Experience is as follows:
“The Opensignal Coverage Experience metric measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.
Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.
Coverage Experience measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.”
O2 dead last again. Such a joke of a network!
In London, personally I find 3 to be faster and more reliable than EE. Not to mention the significant price difference – well over £20 cheaper on 3 than EE. I do wonder, once 3 starts to win customers over and shake off the bad network reputation, will they start to increase prices?
I live in Milton Keynes, EE is dreadful here. In fact most mobile networks are quite patchy in the entire city but EE is the worst of them of all. Thankfully managed to port out today!