Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Opensignal Name the UK Top 4G and 5G Mobile Operators for H2 2024

Wednesday, Sep 25th, 2024 (7:08 am) - Score 5,160
opensignal_app_logo

Crowdsourced benchmarking firm Opensignal has today published their latest Mobile Network Experience Report for H2 2024, which examines the 4G and 5G (mobile broadband) services of all four primary networks – EE, Vodafone, O2 and Three UK – to find which delivers the best performance. Overall, EE scooped 10 out of 14 awards.

As usual, the report is based off data (speed and signal tests etc.) gathered from people using hundreds of thousands of devices (Smartphones etc.) between 1st June and 29th August 2024. The results were then processed to reveal how the primary mobile network operators compared across various categories.

The study continues to be predominantly focused upon the combined performance of 3G, 4G and 5G networks, but it also splits out some of the results for 5G-only connections. Overall, EE continued to pick up the win for most of the performance categories in the primary study, while Three UK came top for 5G download speed, 5G upload speed and general network availability (i.e. % of time users spent connected to a network), albeit not 5G availability where EE now tops the table.

Advertisement

Elsewhere, O2 only managed to pick up one win for ‘Coverage Experience’, while Vodafone failed to score any wins across any categories – despite still performing reasonably well in several areas.

Opensignal-uk-mobileawards-H2-2024

Download Speed Experience – All Mobile Connections
(H2 2023 Result in Brackets)

1. EE 45.9Mbps (40Mbps)
2. Three UK 38Mbps (34.5Mbps)
3. Vodafone 31.1Mbps (27.9Mbps)
4. O2 23.1Mbps (20.9Mbps)

Upload Speed Experience – All Mobile Connections

1. EE 9.8Mbps (9.3Mbps)
2. Vodafone 7.8Mbps (8Mbps)
3. Three UK 7.1Mbps (6.3Mbps)
4. O2 5.3Mbps (5Mbps)

Download Speeds – 5G

1. Three UK 208.9Mbps (205.5Mbps)
2. Vodafone 138.7Mbps (114.3Mbps)
3. EE 96.8Mbps (99.5Mbps)
4. O2 80.1Mbps (77Mbps)

Upload Speeds – 5G

1. Three UK 19.2Mbps (17.5Mbps)
2. EE 17.7Mbps (15.9Mbps)
3. Vodafone 15.1Mbps (14.9Mbps)
4. O2 10.1Mbps (10Mbps)

UK Availability % – All Mobile Connections

1. Three UK 99.2% (99.1%)
2. EE 98.5% (98.5%)
3. O2 97.4% (97.3%)
4. Vodafone 95.4% (97.5%)

UK Availability % – 5G

1. EE 13.2% (10.6%)
2. Vodafone 9.6% (10%)
3. Three UK 9.3% (10.3%)
4. O2 8.3% (10.1%)

Overall, most of the mobile operators seemed to record a performance improvement over this time last year, albeit with smaller changes now that the first generation 5G deployments have reached some level of maturity. But sadly, O2 continued to generally trend toward the bottom of the pack across most of the key performance metrics.

However, the 5G availability (% of time spent on 5G) performance of Vodafone, Three UK and O2 all seemed to suffer a fall over this time last year, with O2’s drop from 10.1% to 8.3% being particularly pronounced. We aren’t quite sure why this has occurred, although 5G availability is one of those areas that can be affected by external factors that impact signal strength (e.g. the weather) and other changes (i.e. it doesn’t mean that 5G coverage shrank). The 3G switch off and wider changes in 4G signal strength, such as via the ‘Share Rural Network’ programme, may have also impacted this area.

Advertisement

Naturally, there are caveats to this sort of study, such as the fact that app-based crowdsourced data can be impacted by any limitations or locations of the devices or plans being used, which at the same time removes the ability to adopt a common type of hardware and environment to help form a solid baseline. Naturally, some operators also have better 4G or 5G coverage, lots of spectrum bands and more advanced networks than others too.

Suffice to say that performance testing like this may not always tell the whole story, although Opensignal are generally one of the better organisations at analysing such data.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
7 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Alastair Stevens says:

    EE does seem the best network, and I’ve noticed an anecdotal degradation since switching to SMARTY (a.k.a. 3) – but it’s good enough overall. I’m not personally bothered about speed, more about reliability and coverage.

    And the enormous cost difference with ‘premium’ EE is just too much to ignore now (we were on BT before but obviously they no longer offer mobile tariffs under their brand). I can get everything I need for £7/month, and spend the difference on better broadband 🙂

    1. Avatar photo Raymond says:

      I am personally on Smarty but if you want a budget connection to EE then 1pmobile may be the one. My dad is on the 1 year talker plan so not a lot data but you can get decent amounts of data on other of their plans.
      I switched from 3 to Smarty (3 years ago) after being with 3 for about 7 years and noticed no difference apart from the much reduced cost.

  2. Avatar photo Gregowski says:

    Someone explain the difference between coverage experience and availability please?

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      The full report generalises this a bit too much, but the definition of Coverage Experience is as follows:

      “The Opensignal Coverage Experience metric measures the extent of mobile networks in the places people live, work and travel. The metric represents the experience users receive as they travel around areas where they would reasonably expect to find coverage.

      Traditional coverage metrics typically estimate either a percentage of land area covered, or a percentage of population covered; often neither will be an accurate measurement of the true user expectation and experience. In many markets there are areas where neither population density nor geographic area reflect the importance of coverage to users. For example, in a large mountain range most users will not expect coverage in the wilderness, but poor coverage in the relatively small area of a ski resort is critical for the enjoyment of a holiday. Estimates based purely on population give undue significance to coverage in the most densely populated areas.

      Coverage Experience measures geographic coverage of populated areas and therefore more accurately reflects the coverage expectations and experience of typical users. It can give a result that is somewhat different to traditional estimates based on either geographic or population measures. The metric uses a scale from 0 to 10.”

  3. Avatar photo Ian says:

    O2 dead last again. Such a joke of a network!

  4. Avatar photo ND says:

    In London, personally I find 3 to be faster and more reliable than EE. Not to mention the significant price difference – well over £20 cheaper on 3 than EE. I do wonder, once 3 starts to win customers over and shake off the bad network reputation, will they start to increase prices?

  5. Avatar photo A350 says:

    I live in Milton Keynes, EE is dreadful here. In fact most mobile networks are quite patchy in the entire city but EE is the worst of them of all. Thankfully managed to port out today!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching or random moderation checks by the anti-spam system.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £25.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £25.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £26.50 - 27.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Brsk UK ISP Logo
Brsk £19.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £22.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5904)
  2. BT (3617)
  3. Politics (2677)
  4. Business (2392)
  5. Openreach (2382)
  6. Building Digital UK (2311)
  7. Mobile Broadband (2099)
  8. FTTC (2073)
  9. Statistics (1870)
  10. 4G (1771)
  11. Virgin Media (1721)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1552)
  13. Fibre Optic (1453)
  14. Wireless Internet (1444)
  15. FTTH (1384)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon