Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

FarrPoint Find UK Councils Prioritise Gigabit Broadband, Ignore Data Centres

Thursday, Jan 23rd, 2025 (9:34 am) - Score 400
Map-of-the-UK-blue-vector-showing-data-links-to-key-points-by-CoPilot-for-MJ-020524

Consultancy firm FarrPoint has today published their third annual (2025) survey of digital leaders at councils across England, Scotland and Wales. The results reveal that expanding the coverage of gigabit broadband remains the top priority for most local authorities. But on the flip side, only 4% of surveyed councils are developing a dedicated data centre strategy.

The report – FarrPoint Digital Connectivity Survey 2025 (PDF) – found that most respondents chose gigabit broadband (1000Mbps+) as their number one priority, while getting 100% of their area covered by at least “superfast” (30Mbps+) connectivity still features as the second-highest priority for councils. After that tends to come 4G and 5G mobile.

NOTE: The Government’s £5bn Project Gigabit broadband rollout scheme aims to extend related networks to deliver “nationwide” (c.99%) coverage by 2030. Such networks already cover 86% of premises (here) and Ofcom predicts this will reach 97-98% by May 2027 (here).

Top Digital Priorities for 2025 (Councils)
1. More areas covered by gigabit broadband
2. Ensuring 100% of premises in the area have at least superfast connectivity
3. More areas covered by 4G
4. More areas covered by 5G
5. Encouraging adoption of available digital connectivity and services by residents and businesses
6. Developing new smart places (IoT) projects
7. Ensuring digital connectivity is aligned with net-zero targets

However, despite the new government recently classifying Data Centres (here) as being part of Critical National Infrastructure (CNI), only 4% of surveyed councils said they were developing a dedicated data centre strategy for their regions. But 50% of respondents did say they were interested, although they haven’t yet investigated the impact of data centres on their area.

Advertisement

Elsewhere, only 40% of respondents reported having a digital connectivity strategy in place that is less than three years old (rising to 69% if we include those with a strategy that is OVER 3 years old), while 18% don’t have a digital strategy and 13% are still developing one.

Unfortunately, it continues to be the case that most local authorities identified lack of funding from central government (74%) as being one of the main barriers to improving digital connectivity, which was followed by the same proportion (74%) highlighting challenges with local infrastructure deployments. This isn’t too surprising, particularly given that the new Project Gigabit programme has been managed by central government, which is different from past programmes that shopped the problem and its funding out to local authorities.

Farrpoint-main-barriers-to-improving-local-UK-connectivity-2025

The survey similarly found that, for 55% of local authorities, such funding is essential for their current level of innovation in digital connectivity. While 34% consider it helpful but not essential, they acknowledge they couldn’t undertake projects such as 5G mobile and FTTP initiatives alone. Only 8% have yet to secure funding, despite actively pursuing it after previous rejections.

Advertisement

Additional Survey Highlights

➤ Over three-quarters (76%) of surveyed local authorities now have a digital champion, reflecting growing recognition of their value in supporting digital connectivity.

➤ The proportion of authorities who have defined net-zero targets and understand the link to digital connectivity is only 13%, and those deferring responsibility to other departments is 8%.

➤ The number of respondents who felt fully informed about digital connectivity coverage in their region is lower than expected at 29%, although no respondents had only limited knowledge (71% considered themselves to be “reasonably informed“).

➤ 80% of local authorities are actively promoting take-up, largely through digital inclusion initiatives like device loans, skills training, and social tariff awareness, benefiting both residents and council engagement. However, 16% have yet to implement such measures due to resource constraints, lack of a clear strategy, and dispersed responsibilities within their councils.

Speaking of adoption, the survey also looked at how local authorities were identifying the barriers to take-up of new services by both residents and businesses. Naturally the vast majority highlighted the lack of network coverage as being a key barrier, followed by affordability, lack of awareness, lack of digital skills, lack of demand stimulation and less than 8% perceived that locals saw no benefit from these services.

Dr Andrew Muir, Chief Executive at FarrPoint, said:

“It was particularly nice to see a spread of survey responses from across the four nations, including increased input from Northern Ireland representatives.

The local involvement will be needed as the continued expansion of 5G takes place and the increased developments around data centres raise pros and cons for local areas, all of which need to be considered. Change and opportunity will continue, with 30 years in telecom consultancy, I can vouch for this personally!

Collaboration between local authorities and connectivity providers can be a challenge as they may not understand each other’s drivers and priorities. We believe delivery could be greatly improved to everyone’s benefit by investing in these relationships and digital champions will be key to this. Hopefully 2025 is the year that this gets appropriately resourced.”

The full survey is worth a read as it offers a unique insight into how local authorities perceive the current state of digital connectivity, its impact and implementation.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
3 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo FFF says:

    As BDUK are leading on getting gigabit everywhere, many councils no longer bother with a digital team. Why would they when budgets are squeezed? And they could see data centres as a distraction, expensive with few jobs, I expect they just let the network operators get on with building infrastructure where needed, which seems sensible. After all, if you’ve got gigabit infrastructure you can get to a data centre.

  2. Avatar photo Ivor says:

    I suppose there’s the argument that faster/more reliable broadband has more easily recognised economic benefits that data centres don’t.

    DCs don’t create that many jobs, especially after construction is complete, yet carry some of the same downsides like noise and high energy consumption. That is only predicted to get worse with the AI boom if it turns out that’s not a bubble. The new jobs won’t be particularly high pay or high skill either.

    A lot of these DCs will be owned/operated by companies that are infamous for their tax strategies, though I suppose it will be hard to avoid paying business rates.

    With the centralised nature of many ISP networks, it’s not like it’s about providing better or faster services to locals either.

  3. Avatar photo dubious says:

    Why would councils be funding datacentres? Surely their involvement is just for the permitting process?

    It is also up to the company operating the DC to ensure robust fibre connectivity is available, even if that means paying for it to be run.

    Very little benefit for having a massive DC in your county.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £23.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £25.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £25.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £19.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £23.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (6150)
  2. BT (3691)
  3. Politics (2777)
  4. Business (2481)
  5. Openreach (2446)
  6. Building Digital UK (2364)
  7. Mobile Broadband (2200)
  8. FTTC (2094)
  9. Statistics (1951)
  10. 4G (1856)
  11. Virgin Media (1811)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1615)
  13. Fibre Optic (1490)
  14. Wireless Internet (1477)
  15. 5G (1453)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon