Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

BT Shun Rural Mobile Roaming Plan from Three UK, O2 and Vodafone

Monday, Mar 18th, 2019 (3:15 pm) - Score 13,613

Telecoms giant BT (EE) has rejected an industry proposal from rival operators Three UK, Vodafone and O2 that would have aimed to improve national 4G network coverage via “rural roaming,” where signals in remote areas could roam onto whatever alternative network was available (like EU roaming).

At present the Government wants to see mobile networks achieve 95% geographic coverage of the UK by 2022 (here), ideally via 4G or faster network technology (their manifesto commitment wasn’t specific). The difficulty stems from the fact that not all mobile network operators are currently expected to achieve that level of coverage (except for EE).

According to Ofcom’s most recent Connected Nations 2018 report, geographic 4G (LTE) network coverage from all operators is 97% in urban locations but sadly this falls to only 62% in rural areas. The overall outdoor geographic coverage of 4G services across the UK is still painfully low at 66% (up from 43% a year earlier) from all four mobile operators or 91% from at least one operator (EE).

Advertisement

The idea of solving this via a roaming agreement, even if only applicable to UK rural areas, is nothing new and has cropped up multiple times over the past few years in one form of another. Last autumn Ofcom proposed it again (Rural Wholesale Access) and the regulator suggested that it could “improve coverage by 2-3 percentage points for the holders of the 700MHz coverage obligations and by 5-10 percentage for the other operators” (i.e. taking geographic coverage from all operators to about 90% today).

NOTE: The 700MHz band is more intended to support 5G services and is due to be auctioned later in 2019 (here).

Naturally EE, which currently has better geographic coverage than their rivals, isn’t terribly keen on this idea. The operator may well view it as giving a free ride to rivals that haven’t made the same level of investment (excluding ESN related masts as those can be shared), while at the same time also removing any limited advantage they may get from it themselves and stifling the attraction of making future such investments (extending rural coverage isn’t exactly very profitable).

As Ofcom said last year:

It introduces investment risks and consumer experience issues that could be mitigated to a degree. The surest way to introduce a rural wholesale access arrangement would be with the co-operation of operators.

In the past, such arrangements have been strongly resisted by most mobile operators on the basis that the case to impose them is unsustainable, and we expect they will continue to take that position.

Suffice to say that we weren’t surprised when The Times reported over the weekend that BT had refused to take part in the rural roaming proposal from their rivals. Meanwhile O2, Vodafone and Three UK couldn’t see the plan progressing without support from BT, which would of course mean they’d alternatively have to build a lot of extra infrastructure in areas where a signal from EE was already present.

Instead BT remains supportive of Ofcom’s forthcoming auction for the 5G friendly 700MHz radio spectrum band, which includes new coverage obligations (here). This should extend outdoor data coverage to at least 90% of the UK’s entire land area and provide coverage from at least 500 new mobile mast stations in rural areas, among other things.

Advertisement

Ofcom has recognised that it will take “significant investment” to meet the new obligations and so they’re proposing to offer the two coverage obligations as “coverage lots” alongside and separate from spectrum lots in the auction. Each coverage lot would carry an associated discount, up to a maximum set by Ofcom, on the price of spectrum (i.e. a maximum discount in the range £300m-£400m for each obligation).

Sadly this still leaves the problem of getting from 90% to 95% coverage across all operators, although as we said earlier the Government’s manifesto doesn’t specifically mention 2G, 3G, 4G or even 5G technology for this target in the text and it’s easy to see why.

We have already invested heavily to create the widest 4G coverage in the UK, and we are keen to collaborate with government and industry to extend rural coverage into areas where there is none today,” said BT.

Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £22.99
132Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £23.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £24.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £17.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £18.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £20.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
New Forum Topics
By: AbsolutelyRidiculous
By: The Wee Bear
By: LeakedOne
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £18.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Lightning Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £22.99
132Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon