
Residents and businesses in the West Yorkshire (England) market town of Hebden Bridge, which is home to 4,500 people, have been warned that they could suffer from weak to non-existent mobile signals on O2 and Vodafone’s network, potentially lasting into early 2026, after a local mobile mast was suddenly removed.
“I live in Hebden Bridge and as of Monday 20th October, I noticed when out walking my dog, that my mobile signal was gone for O2. After a nose on the local Facebook group, it quickly turned out this was also affecting Vodafone users, but not users of the EE network,” said local resident Ben to ISPreview.
Some indirect feedback from Cornerstone, which manages the mast in question, indicates that the situation stemmed from a dispute with the site’s landowner. O2 later confirmed to ISPreview that the mast’s removal was due to the landlord’s decision, albeit without providing further context.
Advertisement
The situation has left the two mobile operators hurrying to find a replacement site, and a new application has now been placed with the local planning authority. But such things are rarely a rapid process and could still face opposition or other obstacles before deployment can even begin.
Josh Fenton-Glynn, MP for the Calder Valley, said (Halifax Courier):
“Lots of people have been in touch with me about the issues with phone signal around Hebden and Mytholmroyd following the removal of a nearby mast.
We rely on our phones for so much, it is completely unacceptable that thousands have been abruptly left without a service.
Various dates have been mentioned to customers in terms of providing updates, including January 2026. This isn’t good enough – residents and businesses are paying for a service that is not being provided.
Today I have written to the relevant networks explaining what has happened and urging them to fix this as a matter of urgency.
I’ve also asked them to keep customers updated and provide details of compensation available.”
The mobile operators are known to have boosted their signals from other nearby sites, but this won’t be enough to reach everybody and performance for some is likely to remain degraded until a new site can go live.
An O2 spokesperson told ISPreview:
“We apologise to customers in the Hebden Bridge area who may be experiencing issues with their mobile service after a mast in the region was recently removed at the landlord’s request. We’re working urgently to identify a new site and, in the meantime, put a temporary solution in place to minimise disruption for customers.
We’d recommend customers ensure they have Wi-Fi calling enabled on their device so they’re able to make and receive calls and text messages over any broadband network.”
One of the biggest frustrations in all this is with regard to the lack of advanced notice about the situation. The mobile operators could have informed locals before its occurrence, but instead left customers to scramble for answers.
The situation probably isn’t helped by the fact that the town sits in a crisscrossing valley, which makes it difficult to reach every part of the area without the use of multiple mast sites.
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIMBY strikes again. Hopefully they do actually pass laws making it VERY difficult for land owners to demand critical infrastructure to be removed.
Complete speculation – It was likely put in, with a lucrative payment to the landowner initially. The rules changed and MNO’s started paying peanuts in comparison to how much they paid for the land previously.
Suspect the contract was up for renewal and they didn’t agree to the new fee so told Cornerstone to remove it.
Even so, being annoyed at the MNO seems a bit of a stretch if it was a last minute / pull from the landowner. The MP should be talking to the MNO & Landowner to see if they can get a temporary extension until another mast is provisioned if they’re that bothered.
It is his land, so it should be his choice. I bet you would soon complain if someone said they were going to put a mast in your garden, that is if you have a garden. You don’t know the reason why they were asked to removed it. Maybe the person who owns the land have use for it.
It is not good, but that is the way it is if you use land owned by other people.
A load of antennas are on top of one of the towers that used to have lights on for our football ground, now they have LED lights and the towers will be removed. The one with the antennas on are staying, for now anyway, no doubt the club get a bit of money from the networks. But what happens when/if the club decided to remove the tower?
It is a shame really, the towers have been there for as long as I can remember. But I suppose that is the way things are.
Planning permission was being asked to put a mast up not far from me, but that have been turned down, something about it being too high.
Now read the article.
Surely they could install a temporary mast somewhere, in the same way they add temporary coverage for large events.
That’s all for “advertising” purposes. O2 have no interest in helping their customers.
Depends on if they have space, you can just stick one up without asking permission and that can take time.
Which is as good thing, otherwise they will be put anywhere.
I guess Vodafone can just convert the Three mast to a MOCN site to get service back.
Good jobs Smart Meters don’t rely on the O2 or Vodafone networks…