By: MarkJ - 30 January, 2010 (8:17 AM) - Score: 22972 - Wi-Fi
The Pennsylvania State University has developed a new method of indoor Optical Wireless network that does not require a line-of-sight and runs at speeds of 1Gbps+. The setup uses multi-element transmitters and multi-branch optical receivers in a quasi-diffuse configuration (*head explodes*) and could eventually replace Wi-Fi.

The system uses a high-powered laser diode -- a device that converts electricity into light -- as the optical transmitter and an avalanche photo diode -- a device that converts light to electricity -- as the receiver. The light bounces off the walls and is picked up by the receiver.

Jarir Fadlullah, a graduate student in electrical engineering, said:

"The optical system we have offers a very large bandwidth thus a very high speed. We can send one gigabit per second or more over a gigahertz band. Unless the walls are painted solid black [ABSORBS TOO MUCH LIGHT], there is no need to worry about transmission within a room."

Traditional radio frequency systems ( Wi-Fi , WiMAX , 3G etc. ) do not require line of sight transmission, but can pass through some substances and so present a security problem. Light, in a room without windows, will not escape the room, improving security, but also allowing the same frequencies to be used in adjacent rooms without interference.

Multiple sensors could allow the light signal to pass from room to room or even from floor to floor. The system could also be set up to convert the signal to electricity, transfer it to another location and change it back to light. Optical systems can also operate in locations where radio frequency transmission would interfere with other equipment.

There are certainly some clear advantages to the technology, although traditional wireless networks are already approaching similar speeds and have the added advantage of being cheap. They also do not require additional relay stations (in small home environments) to push the signal around additional rooms. In any case it's a long and slow road from the lab to a commercial product.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 14

asa logoNotASpamBot
Posted: 30 January, 2010 - 9:03 PM
Link to comment

high-powered laser

DO NOT LOOK AT ROUTER WITH REMAINING EYE.
asa logocrisruv
Posted: 30 January, 2010 - 10:31 PM
Link to comment

Interesting concepts for security features: walls block signals. What interests me is the conversion into electricity. I foresee signal boosters in the form of power strips that amplify the signal to charge cell phones and such at the same time...
asa logotomc
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 12:14 AM
Link to comment

What is new about this ? High bandwidth transmission using optical signals over laser is nothing new. And yes, every year or so the senders and filters get a little bit better and add 100 mbit. Big deal.

It's still not practical. Very impractical indeed, actually. You would need gigabit wiring into every room's ceiling to make this work, and it will never work outside.
asa logoMitch
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 2:26 AM
Link to comment

I have gigabit in the house... nearly everyone does these days...

get with the times tomc.
asa logopanther
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 6:20 AM
Link to comment

wow this will just make everything more complex because of the clear line of sight problem. ):
asa logoJim
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 7:04 AM
Link to comment

tomc and Panther, I think you are missing the point. Anywhere you have a high density of people (apartment building, condo building, office park, etc.) you have saturation of the 2.4GHz spectrum. 5GHz offers some relief from this, but the congestion is only going to get worse. A technology where your neighbors would never cause interference would be more than worth the additional wiring in many cases.
asa logoduh
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 7:24 AM
Link to comment

Ok, for the reading impaired around here:

* Does not require line of sight
* Light bounces off walls and is picked up by receiver
* Has nothing to do with Microsoft

To repeat:

* Does not use fiber optics or other cable
* Uses omnidirectional light, bouncing off walls
* Has nothing to do with Microsoft
asa logophillipsjk
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 7:36 AM
Link to comment

Nitpick: it bounces off of *one* wall. If I understand the article correctly, you need line-of sight to the wall, but not the router.
asa logophillipsjk
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 7:42 AM
Link to comment

Oops, my bad: did not understand the words: "quasi-diffuse configuration."

So it does bounce off several walls; either at once or in a round-robin fashion.
asa logod00d
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 8:24 AM
Link to comment

can I eavesdrop the data with a hidden camera ?? ;)
asa logoAnthony M. Rasat
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 12:29 PM
Link to comment

I can see the concept though. It's like changing your TV remote battery with brand new one then you can switch channels aiming at your grinning, yellow teeth.
asa logoSlam
Posted: 31 January, 2010 - 7:01 PM
Link to comment

I suspect they are using infrared diodes. IR is a lot like visible light. Now imaging this system was using and 100W lightbulb instead, and you needed to be within the light of that bulb to get internet.

It would work fine in the room you were in. It would probably work terrible in the next room; how much light from a 100W lightbulb passes through your doorway into the hallway or living room? Very very little. Your bandwidth would drop to next to nothing. No close your door; now you get zero light transmission. Light does not pass through walls.

Thus the need for repeaters as mentioned above. Each repeat is a light sensor and new 100W bulb. It picks up the light from the next room and relays that signal though it's own transmitter to the new room.

Nearly every room would need its own repeater. There's no way to get enough light through doorways, eps when doors are closed.
asa logoTom B
Posted: 1 February, 2010 - 2:57 AM
Link to comment

Where I work, at the Very Large Array, we cannot have radio-based networks (no WiFi, no cell phones, no Bluetooth) because it interferes with observing. We could really use an effective optical wireless networking technology.
asa logojw
Posted: 31 October, 2010 - 12:53 PM
Link to comment

Hmm.. infrared transmitters at 1Ghz... So will all users of the product also get a free tan? And when will the paint companies sue for loss of profit in their 'flat' finish lines? ;)

I think this is a terrific proof of concept. 1GB to each node and the first true "Cell" network by definition.
However, I'll wait for version 5 of the production release before exposing my kids to it...

Leave a comment


baffled cheese confused cool frown glee laugh mad mixedup noexpression sad sadder shifty shocked smile smirk timid tongue whatever wink 



Characters left (comments containing swear words may not be saved)

Please MAKE A COPY OF YOUR COMMENT so you can re-post if an error occurs.

Enter this code in the field below.
Security Image






Generated in 0.71413 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).