By: MarkJ - 24 June, 2010 (12:38 PM) - Score: 13430 - Fixed Line Broadband, Video, Ofcom Regulation
Ofcom UK Net NeutralityTelecoms regulator Ofcom has today officially opened a debate into UK Net Neutrality (the principal of treating all internet traffic as equal), and the Traffic Management measures operated by mobile operators and broadband ISPs around the country, with its launch of a new discussion paper on the subject.

Many ISPs employ Traffic Management and Shaping as a means to balance the performance of their networks so that the majority of their customers are not unfairly affected by a minority of heavy users. This is often done by restricting data traffic (bandwidth or speed if you prefer) to busy services like P2P (File Sharing). Many ISPs prefer this to raising prices or being more realistic about their usage allowances.

However some ISPs, such as BT Retail, would like to see even more extensive use of such measures against popular video streaming services. Several internet providers have even gone so far as to suggest that online video sites (e.g. BBC iPlayer, YouTube), Skype (VoIP) and even search engines (Google) should be forced to pay ISPs if they want their content to be given priority over the network (here, here and here).

This has also led to significant concern that network operators and ISPs could engage in anti-competitive behaviour and suppress the quality of content from popular services. Not giving priority to a VoIP service like Skype or internet searches could have adverse effects and even make some services unusable.

Ofcom Chief Executive, Ed Richards, said:

"New EU rules give regulators a clear responsibility to address the emerging issues around traffic management. The question is how Ofcom uses these and existing powers to further the interests of consumers, while supporting vibrant, innovative content production and network deployment.

The internet is playing an increasingly central role in the lives of citizens, consumers and industry. It provides access to an ever growing range of content, applications and services that we have come to both expect and depend on. How this access is controlled by ISPs affects us all and is of wide reaching significance.

At the heart of this discussion is how to ensure that traffic management practices are transparent and how to ensure that traffic management is not used for anti-competitive discrimination."

To place blame upon the people who produce content, those who actually make the internet a fluid and interesting place to visit and are the reason we all want access to it, is potentially very risky for an ISP. However if today's other news showed us anything (Record Breaking UK Broadband Internet Traffic During England v Slovenia Match) it's that keeping up with modern demand can be very costly.

Part of the problem is that some ISPs have simply been unrealistic in what they advertise (i.e. "unlimited") and the prices they charge for that. We do expect that there will need to be some agreements between major content producers and ISPs to help balance the load, but what we don't want to see is ISPs restricting access to all forms of content except a handful who pay them.

Ofcom appears to agree that a line has to be drawn somewhere, to protect the internet and give evolving content a chance to flourish. At the very least it could and probably will require broadband ISPs to be more transparent with their Traffic Management practices. However that alone is unlikely to solve the underlying concerns.

The regulator also has existing competition powers that may be relevant and will gain some support from amended EU Telecoms rules that will be transposed into UK law next year. In the meantime Ofcom's discussion paper will be open for feedback until 9th September.
Ofcom's Net Neutrality Discussion Paper:
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/net-neutrality/

Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 8

asa logoMatt Sharpe
Posted: 24 June, 2010 - 5:48 PM
Link to comment

In my opinion the debate over net neutrality need go no further than this:

http://cabalamat.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/mandelsons_vision_of_the_internet.png

A tiered internet is an absolutely horrifying prospect, end of discussion.
asa logoCarrot63
Posted: 25 June, 2010 - 9:14 AM
Link to comment

The word "debate" here is a bit of a hangover from the last governments use/misuse of the word, which went something like: "We know you're not going to like our pre-determined outcome on which we absolutely won't waver, but we're using the word debate to let you know that a) it's important and b) it was discussed, just not by people like you"

In politer circles, we say "forgone conclusion".
asa logoCarrot63
Posted: 25 June, 2010 - 9:35 AM
Link to comment

I should've added that Ofcom are (probably not accidently) are banging the same, tired old drum about transparency again. Of what earthly use is transparency if you have no choice when you don't like what you see? Takeovers and cross-subsidised commercial muscle have reduced a genuinely vibrant ISP sector to 5 dominant players, who all offer almost identical packages and levels of service. However "transparent" they are, there's almost no point to switching unless you dislike the colour of their logo, as there is nothing to differentiate.

In sectors like this an entirely unregulated market delivers little more that lowest common denominator service and pricing that gravitate naturally to the bottom of the barrel. Just like the music industry, ISPs have dug this hole for themselves; they shouldn't be allowed to use others services to prop up their own failing business model.
asa logoJohnette
Posted: 27 June, 2011 - 6:45 AM
Link to comment

I was really cnofuesd, and this answered all my questions.
asa logocomjnoztve
Posted: 27 June, 2011 - 6:43 PM
Link to comment

7UA2Yt <a href="http://bbtuoiiehbep.com/">bbtuoiiehbep</a>
asa logobzalwj
Posted: 28 June, 2011 - 10:18 AM
Link to comment

QnEjny , [url=http://pwxizpxtkrju.com/]pwxizpxtkrju[/url], [link=http://bgvwkzmjjuqq.com/]bgvwkzmjjuqq[/link], http://bhwshqkxdydw.com/
asa logoetrbvikbej
Posted: 29 June, 2011 - 8:40 AM
Link to comment

Q7o2YU <a href="http://smipdudlrppi.com/">smipdudlrppi</a>
asa logoxrcthwu
Posted: 1 July, 2011 - 2:17 PM
Link to comment

QEBPaf , [url=http://nomkzbzylmep.com/]nomkzbzylmep[/url], [link=http://cogszglkrtez.com/]cogszglkrtez[/link], http://fckvosxizpne.com/



Generated in 0.33538 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).