How much do you pay for just broadband (monthly)?

£0 - £5
£6 - £10
£11 - £15
£16 - £20
£21+

Would you pay more for a reliable superfast broadband speed (25Mbps+)?

Yes (Not sure how much)
Yes (+£5 extra)
Yes (+£10 extra)
Yes (+£15 extra or more)
No

What stops you most from getting superfast broadband?

Price
No Availability
I have it already!
My current service is fine
My area has it but not my ISP
Other

More Polls | Past Polls Archive
By: MarkJ - 27 January, 2012 (7:59 AM) - Score: 1503 - Fixed Line Broadband
bduk deadline mapfibre_optic_broadband_internet_cable.jpgThe UK governments Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) confirms that a further £100 Million of European funding has been "unlocked" to support the rollout of superfast broadband ISP services into rural areas. At the same time a new local authority progress report reveals that three "councils seem to have slipped behind schedule" and are at risk of having their funding withdrawn.

The Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) office wants 90% of people to be within reach of a superfast broadband (24Mbps+) service by 2015 (the last 10% will get at least 2Mbps). An initial budget of £530m was set aside to support this, although a further £100m was added for super-connected cities (here) and today's extra money gives a new total of £730m.

On top of that it has long been known that BDUK's budget could rise by £300m if the plan needed to be extended until 2017 (total spend of £1.03 Billion). This extra money would be extracted from the BBC's TV Licence Fee (i.e. the 3.5% Digital Switchover Budget), although at present no firm decision has been made.

The UK Communications Minister, Ed Vaizey MP, said:

"Britain needs fast broadband to drive economic growth and connect remote communities. We are making a significant investment in taking broadband to those homes and businesses currently missing out on decent internet access.

I have been impressed by the enthusiasm the majority of councils have shown for seizing the opportunity to roll-out superfast broadband."

According to Vaizey, most local councils look set to have their "draft" Local Broadband Plans (LBP) approved by the governments deadline (end of February 2012) and some, such as the plan for Wales, have already been cleared. The final plan then "needs to be agreed" by the end of April 2012.

Overall most of the 47 related projects are now ready to begin taking superfast broadband to homes and businesses in their area. A new geographic UK map of progress shows this best. Sadly not everybody is doing so well.

The governments report marks 13 local authorities as being at a "medium" (amber) risk of missing the deadline. On top of that 3 local authorities are marked as red and thus most at risk of having their funding pulled due to not meeting the timetable.
RED Local Authorities

* Knowsley, Liverpool, St. Helens, Sefton, Wirral

* Newcastle upon Tyne, North Tyneside, South Tyneside, Sunderland

* Bath and North East Somerset
Nobody will be surprised to see Bath and North East Somerset (BNES) listed as their local problems have been well covered in the news (here), although Liverpool and a few of the others will certainly raise some eyebrows.

Mr Vaizey said:

"I am disappointed that a few councils seem to have slipped behind schedule. I will be seeking urgent talks with these councils to ensure they understand the need to make real progress quickly. We do not intend to continue to fund councils if they continue to fail to deliver."

It's unclear what would happen if councils lose their funding, although in December 2011 the government proposed to run a national procurement for areas that were not ready by the end of July 2012. This suggests that the already allocated funding (detailed here) would still get spent, albeit not by the council.

The government expects that most councils will match its funding from their coffers and that this will then be doubled (match-funded) again by the private sector. However several recent reports, such as this week's briefing from Socitm (here), have warned that some local authorities are struggling to find the needed cash.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 50

asa logoNick
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 10:14 AM
Link to comment

Maybe the councils have realised the process is a farce, and they don't want to subsidise BT and underwrite it's huge profits. Maybe they can think of better ways of spending taxpayers money
asa logoKyle
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 12:46 PM
Link to comment

I am quite surprised by the presence of Merseyside in that 'Red' list.

With my knowledge of those areas through residing in one of them, I can certainly disagree with the 'lack' of superfast availability, especially since I live in an extremely rural location and have just placed my FTTC service order.

I guess that this relates to the Council and their plans for how to spend the funds. I'm not sure what Merseyside has been allocated, but from what I know about the lack of interest in projects such as these from the Council, I would very much like to see the funds go to the private sector.

BT has been very good to me personally with its coverage and service availability. Obviously, everybody on an ISP forum will always have some jibe ready for BT, but from personal experience, they have gone where nobody else has.
asa logoKyle
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 12:48 PM
Link to comment

Take Virgin, for example.

Every home bar 4/5 in the village is passed with coax. I have written to VM many times, advising that I will dig the trenches and have the other households show their interest in joining.

Nevertheless, all I receive is a big no. Acceptable, but disheartening all the same. BT have been good to me, the Council hasn't.
asa logoDeduction
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 4:21 PM
Link to comment

Well said Nick :)
asa logoBob
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 4:26 PM
Link to comment

We need competition to BT in the UK. In what other area business would an effective monopoly situation be permited?

Even worse is we now have government money being used to reinforce the BT monopoly. It is not a good situation to be in and does not bod well for the future of HS broadband in the UK.

Without competition BT will drag it's heels and do as little as possible as it means a lower level of investment and a greater chance of more government funds.

Instead of leaving it to councils it should have been done at a country level/ Possible splitting England into Regions for the rol out
asa logoDeduction
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 5:11 PM
Link to comment

Indeed Bob, i wouldnt be shocked if we have to wait another 50 years before we get FTTP nationwide (or whatever the latest tech is called that far in the future).
asa logoFibreFred
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 6:31 PM
Link to comment

Unless somehow it gets cheaper to run fibre right out into the sticks you are probably right. Some people might never get it, some people out in sticks bearly have electricity and no gas so why would this be any different?

Fujitsu had a chance to be that competition and walked away. And BDUK make the winners sign up to firm commitments on what they have to roll out so... no heel dragging.
asa logoDeduction
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 7:08 PM
Link to comment

Its not just rurals, by 2015 only around 2% of this country will have FTTP/H a sad state of affairs indeed.
asa logoBerks
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 7:14 PM
Link to comment

Well Decuction/Bob do you have the required 29 billion to invest into a full FTTP network?
People expect that a full FTTP network should be rolled out instantly but fail to show the market demand and funding for a prodject that would take decades to complete.
asa logoFibreFred
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 7:51 PM
Link to comment

What do Virgin cover.... 50% of the country? They have ducts already so... they could do 50% of the country whenever they want if people demand FTTP/H speeds

Right now 50% of the country can have 30, 50 and soon 100Mbps from Virgin but... so if there's a craving for such speed why isn't 50% of the country using Virgin ?
asa logoBob
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 9:30 PM
Link to comment

@Fibrefred.

Because Cable covers the same area that FTTC does.

What a suprise that where BT faces competition from Fibre is rushes to rollout FTTC.

Where BT face no competition they do not rush

This is not just rural areas there are citys and large towns that have little to no HS Broadband and not even a date
asa logoFibreFred
Posted: 27 January, 2012 - 11:16 PM
Link to comment

But Virgin don't do FTTH there is no fibre competition there. I'm saying even where Virgin operate they don't have all of the market with their high speeds? So where is this huge demand?
asa logoBerks
Posted: 28 January, 2012 - 12:03 AM
Link to comment

There is not a massive market demand for faster speeds, the majority of virgin medias fibre coax customers are on the slower packages.

BT cannot be everywhere at once it does take time to rollout from cabinet to exchange. Rollout till 2014 so those towns will be covered by then.
asa logoDeduction
Posted: 28 January, 2012 - 2:26 AM
Link to comment

quote"Well Decuction/Bob do you have the required 29 billion to invest into a full FTTP network?"

Where do you even get that as a figure as to what a full FTTP rollout would cost?

Is that based on BT maths again?
asa logoNew_Londoner
Posted: 28 January, 2012 - 12:16 PM
Link to comment

@Deduction
IIRC the £29bn came from the BSG. Let us know when you've deposited the necessary funds so work can begin....

1 2 3 4 Next >

Leave a comment


baffled cheese confused cool frown glee laugh mad mixedup noexpression sad sadder shifty shocked smile smirk timid tongue whatever wink 



Characters left (comments containing swear words may not be saved)

Please MAKE A COPY OF YOUR COMMENT so you can re-post if an error occurs.

Enter this code in the field below.
Security Image






Generated in 0.65962 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).